• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我不知道该看向何处:不确定性不耐受对朝向非预测性情绪面孔干扰物的眼跳的影响。

I don't know where to look: the impact of intolerance of uncertainty on saccades towards non-predictive emotional face distractors.

作者信息

Morriss Jayne, McSorley Eugene, van Reekum Carien M

机构信息

a Centre for Integrative Neuroscience and Neurodynamics, School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences , University of Reading , Reading , UK.

b School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences , University of Reading , Reading , UK.

出版信息

Cogn Emot. 2018 Aug;32(5):953-962. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1370418. Epub 2017 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1080/02699931.2017.1370418
PMID:28835166
Abstract

Attentional bias to uncertain threat is associated with anxiety disorders. Here we examine the extent to which emotional face distractors (happy, angry and neutral) and individual differences in intolerance of uncertainty (IU), impact saccades in two versions of the "follow a cross" task. In both versions of the follow the cross task, the probability of receiving an emotional face distractor was 66.7%. To increase perceived uncertainty regarding the location of the face distractors, in one of the tasks additional non-predictive cues were presented before the onset of the face distractors and target. We did not find IU to impact saccades towards non-cued face distractors. However, we found IU, over Trait Anxiety, to impact saccades towards non-predictive cueing of face distractors. Under these conditions, IU individuals' eyes were pulled towards angry face distractors and away from happy face distractors overall, and the speed of this deviation of the eyes was determined by the combination of the cue and emotion of the face. Overall, these results suggest a specific role of IU on attentional bias to threat during uncertainty. These findings highlight the potential of intolerance of uncertainty-based mechanisms to help understand anxiety disorder pathology and inform potential treatment targets.

摘要

对不确定威胁的注意偏向与焦虑症有关。在此,我们研究了情绪面孔干扰物(开心、愤怒和中性)以及不确定性不耐受(IU)的个体差异在两种版本的“跟随十字”任务中对扫视的影响程度。在两个版本的跟随十字任务中,出现情绪面孔干扰物的概率均为66.7%。为了增加对面孔干扰物位置的感知不确定性,在其中一个任务中,在面孔干扰物和目标出现之前还会呈现额外的非预测性线索。我们没有发现IU会影响对无线索面孔干扰物的扫视。然而,我们发现,与特质焦虑相比,IU会影响对面孔干扰物非预测性线索的扫视。在这些条件下,总体而言,IU个体的眼睛会被愤怒面孔干扰物吸引,而远离开心面孔干扰物,并且眼睛这种偏离的速度由线索和面孔情绪的组合决定。总体而言,这些结果表明IU在不确定性期间对威胁的注意偏向上具有特定作用。这些发现凸显了基于不确定性不耐受机制在帮助理解焦虑症病理和为潜在治疗靶点提供信息方面的潜力。

相似文献

1
I don't know where to look: the impact of intolerance of uncertainty on saccades towards non-predictive emotional face distractors.我不知道该看向何处:不确定性不耐受对朝向非预测性情绪面孔干扰物的眼跳的影响。
Cogn Emot. 2018 Aug;32(5):953-962. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2017.1370418. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
2
Furious snarling: Teeth-exposure and anxiety-related attentional bias towards angry faces.愤怒的咆哮:对愤怒面孔的牙齿暴露和焦虑相关注意力偏向。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 27;13(11):e0207695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207695. eCollection 2018.
3
Attentional bias towards angry faces is moderated by the activation of a social processing mode in the general population.一般人群中,对愤怒面孔的注意力偏向受社会加工模式激活的调节。
Cogn Emot. 2019 Nov;33(7):1317-1329. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2018.1561423. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
4
Upper-lower visual field asymmetries in oculomotor inhibition of emotional distractors.眼动对情绪干扰物抑制中的上下视野不对称性。
Vision Res. 2012 Jun 1;62:209-19. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.04.010. Epub 2012 Apr 24.
5
The influence of emotional face distractors on attentional orienting in Chinese children with autism spectrum disorder.情绪面孔干扰物对自闭症谱系障碍儿童注意定向的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0250998. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250998. eCollection 2021.
6
Intolerance of uncertainty is associated with reduced attentional inhibition in the absence of direct threat.对不确定性的容忍度与直接威胁不存在时注意力抑制的减少有关。
Behav Res Ther. 2019 Jul;118:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
7
Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions: Naturalistic faces.无关愤怒面部表情对注意力捕获的电生理证据:自然面孔
Neurosci Lett. 2017 Jan 10;637:44-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.11.055. Epub 2016 Nov 27.
8
Unattended facial expressions asymmetrically bias the concurrent processing of nonemotional information.无人关注的面部表情会不对称地影响非情感信息的同步处理。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Sep;17(9):1386-95. doi: 10.1162/0898929054985437.
9
It occurs after all: Attentional bias towards happy faces in the dot-probe task.毕竟它还是出现了:点探测任务中对笑脸的注意偏向。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jul;82(5):2463-2481. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02017-y.
10
Physical aggression and attentional bias to angry faces: An event related potential study.身体攻击与对愤怒面孔的注意力偏向:一项事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res. 2019 Nov 15;1723:146387. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146387. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Differential effects of threat types on attentional processes: a comparison of snakes and blood-injury-injection stimuli.威胁类型对注意过程的差异影响:蛇与血液-损伤-注射刺激的比较
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 24;15:1498709. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1498709. eCollection 2024.
2
Just say 'I don't know': Understanding information stagnation during a highly ambiguous visual search task.就说“我不知道”:理解在高度模糊的视觉搜索任务中信息停滞的现象。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 7;18(12):e0295669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295669. eCollection 2023.
3
The impact of threat of shock-induced anxiety on alerting, orienting, and executive function in women: an ERP study.
震惊诱发焦虑对女性警觉、定向和执行功能的影响:一项 ERP 研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Dec;23(6):1513-1533. doi: 10.3758/s13415-023-01133-0. Epub 2023 Oct 18.
4
Using what we know about threat reactivity models to understand mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic.利用我们对威胁反应模型的了解来理解 COVID-19 大流行期间的心理健康。
Behav Res Ther. 2022 Jun;153:104082. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104082. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
5
Proof of Concept of Novel Visuo-Spatial-Motor Fall Prevention Training for Old People.针对老年人的新型视觉空间运动防跌倒训练的概念验证
Geriatrics (Basel). 2021 Jun 29;6(3):66. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics6030066.
6
The Missing Pieces of the Puzzle: A Review on the Interactive Nature of A-Priori Expectancies and Attention Bias toward Threat.拼图中缺失的部分:关于先验预期与对威胁的注意偏向的交互性质的综述
Brain Sci. 2020 Oct 17;10(10):745. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10100745.
7
State anxiety reduces working memory capacity but does not impact filtering cost for neutral distracters.状态焦虑会降低工作记忆容量,但不会影响对中性分心物的过滤成本。
Psychophysiology. 2020 Oct;57(10):e13625. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13625. Epub 2020 Jun 29.