Awwad Daniel H, Buckley Jonathan D, Thomson Rebecca L, O'Connor Matthew, Carbone Tania A, Chehade Mellick J
Discipline of Orthopaedics and Trauma, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Nutritional Physiology Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2017 Sep;8(3):166-172. doi: 10.1177/2151458517722608. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
To investigate the reliability of a clinically applicable method of dynamometry to assess and monitor hip abductor muscle strength in older persons.
Bilateral isometric hip abductor muscle strength measured with a handheld dynamometer, patients supine with the contralateral hip positioned directly against a wall for stabilization. Reliability determined by comparing intra-assessor and inter-assessor results and comparison to a criterion standard (stabilized dynamometer with patients in the standing position).
UniSA Nutritional Physiology Research Centre.
Twenty-one patients older than 65 years were recruited from the Royal Adelaide Hospital.
Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), bias, and limits of agreement calculated to determine reliability.
Intra-assessor and inter-assessor ICCs were high (0.94 and 0.92-0.94, respectively). There was no intra-assessor bias and narrow limits of agreement (±2.4%). There was a small inter-assessor bias but narrow limits of agreement (0.6%-0.9% and ± 2.3%, respectively). There was a wide variation comparing results to the criterion standard (±5.0%-5.2% limits of agreement), highlighting problems attributed to difficulties that the test population had with the standing position used in the criterion standard test.
Testing older persons' hip abductor muscle strength while in the supine position with optimal pelvic stabilization using a handheld dynamometer is highly reliable. While further studies must be done to assess patients with specific pathologies, this test has potential application to monitor and evaluate the effects of surgical interventions and/or rehabilitation protocols for a variety of conditions affecting hip abductor function such as hip fractures and arthritis.
探讨一种临床适用的测力法评估和监测老年人髋外展肌力量的可靠性。
采用手持测力计测量双侧等长髋外展肌力量,患者仰卧,对侧髋部直接靠墙以保持稳定。通过比较评估者内和评估者间的结果以及与标准方法(患者站立位使用稳定测力计)进行比较来确定可靠性。
南澳大学营养生理学研究中心。
从皇家阿德莱德医院招募了21名65岁以上的患者。
计算组内相关系数(ICC)、偏差和一致性界限以确定可靠性。
评估者内和评估者间的ICC较高(分别为0.94和0.92 - 0.94)。评估者内无偏差,一致性界限较窄(±2.4%)。评估者间存在较小偏差,但一致性界限较窄(分别为0.6% - 0.9%和±2.3%)。与标准方法比较结果存在较大差异(一致性界限为±5.0% - 5.2%),突出了由于测试人群在标准方法测试中站立位存在困难所导致的问题。
使用手持测力计在仰卧位并实现最佳骨盆稳定状态下测试老年人髋外展肌力量具有高度可靠性。虽然必须进一步开展研究以评估患有特定疾病的患者,但该测试在监测和评估各种影响髋外展功能的疾病(如髋部骨折和关节炎)的手术干预和/或康复方案效果方面具有潜在应用价值。