• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development and Initial Validation of the Novel Scale for Assessing Quality of Life of Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy.新型评估接受雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌患者生活质量量表的制定与初步验证。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Sep 5;130(17):2082-2087. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.213416.
2
Quality of life in prostate cancer patients taking androgen deprivation therapy.接受雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌患者的生活质量。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Jan;54(1):85-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00567.x.
3
Information needs of men on androgen deprivation therapy.男性雄激素剥夺治疗信息需求。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(10):1503-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10475.x. Epub 2011 Aug 24.
4
Influence of hot flashes on quality of life in patients with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy.潮热对接受雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌患者生活质量的影响。
Int J Urol. 2004 Sep;11(9):735-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2004.00896.x.
5
Development of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Symptoms and Impacts of Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Advanced Prostate Cancer.开发一种新的患者报告结局测量工具,用于评估晚期前列腺癌雄激素剥夺治疗的症状和影响。
Adv Ther. 2024 Aug;41(8):3076-3088. doi: 10.1007/s12325-024-02888-9. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
6
Predictors of depression, anxiety and quality of life in patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy.接受雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌患者抑郁、焦虑及生活质量的预测因素。
Psychooncology. 2013 Oct;22(10):2169-76. doi: 10.1002/pon.3269. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
7
Validity and reliability of Chinese version of Adult Carer Quality of Life questionnaire (AC-QoL) in family caregivers of stroke survivors.中文版成人照顾者生活质量问卷(AC-QoL)在脑卒中幸存者家庭照顾者中的效度和信度
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 13;12(11):e0186680. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186680. eCollection 2017.
8
[Investigation and analysis of child neglect in 1163 urban children aged 3 - 6 years].1163名3至6岁城市儿童忽视状况的调查与分析
Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2003 Jul;41(7):501-7.
9
Development and validation of a quality-of-life scale for Chinese patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia.中国良性前列腺增生患者生活质量量表的研制与验证
BJU Int. 2004 Oct;94(6):837-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05043.x.
10
Bipolar Androgen Therapy for Men With Androgen Ablation Naïve Prostate Cancer: Results From the Phase II BATMAN Study.双相雄激素疗法用于初治雄激素剥夺的前列腺癌男性患者:II期蝙蝠侠研究结果
Prostate. 2016 Sep;76(13):1218-26. doi: 10.1002/pros.23209. Epub 2016 Jun 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Decreased biochemical progression in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer using a novel mefenamic acid anti-inflammatory therapy: A randomized controlled trial.使用新型甲芬那酸抗炎疗法降低去势抵抗性前列腺癌患者的生化进展:一项随机对照试验。
Oncol Lett. 2020 Jun;19(6):4151-4160. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.11509. Epub 2020 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of 1-year Outcomes in Survivors of Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation or Mechanical Ventilation: A Prospective Observational Study.接受体外膜肺氧合或机械通气的严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征幸存者1年预后评估:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 May 20;130(10):1161-1168. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.205847.
2
Clinical Use of Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice to Assess Patient Reported Prostate Cancer Quality of Life Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.用于临床实践的扩展前列腺癌指数综合评估患者报告的机器人辅助前列腺癌根治术后生活质量。
J Urol. 2017 Jan;197(1):109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.07.080. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
3
Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prostate-specific Antigen <20 ng/ml.前列腺特异性抗原<20 ng/ml患者中前列腺影像报告和数据系统用于前列腺癌磁共振成像诊断的评估
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Jun 20;129(12):1432-8. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.183419.
4
Isoflavones and Prostate Cancer: A Review of Some Critical Issues.异黄酮与前列腺癌:一些关键问题的综述
Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Feb 5;129(3):341-7. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.174488.
5
Cancer statistics, 2016.癌症统计数据,2016 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
6
Course and Moderators of Hot Flash Interference during Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Matched Comparison.前列腺癌雄激素剥夺治疗期间潮热干扰的病程及调节因素:一项配对比较研究
J Urol. 2015 Sep;194(3):690-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.026. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
7
Adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy and strategies to mitigate them.雄激素剥夺治疗的不良反应及其缓解策略。
Eur Urol. 2015 May;67(5):825-36. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.010. Epub 2014 Aug 2.
8
Quality of life issues in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy: a review.男性接受雄激素剥夺治疗的生活质量问题:综述。
Asian J Androl. 2012 Mar;14(2):226-31. doi: 10.1038/aja.2011.108. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
9
Content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: perspectives from a PROMIS meeting.患者报告结局测量的内容效度:来自 PROMIS 会议的观点。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Jun;21(5):739-46. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9990-8. Epub 2011 Aug 25.
10
Development and validation of health beliefs model scale for prostate cancer screenings (HBM-PCS): evidence from exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses.健康信念模型前列腺癌筛查量表的编制与验证:来自探索性和验证性因子分析的证据。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2011 Dec;15(5):478-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2010.12.003. Epub 2011 Jan 20.

新型评估接受雄激素剥夺治疗的前列腺癌患者生活质量量表的制定与初步验证。

Development and Initial Validation of the Novel Scale for Assessing Quality of Life of Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Androgen Deprivation Therapy.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.

Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Sep 5;130(17):2082-2087. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.213416.

DOI:10.4103/0366-6999.213416
PMID:28836552
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5586177/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been no a specific scale to measure quality of life (QOL) for prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to date. This study aimed to develop and initially validate the scale to evaluate QOL for prostate cancer patients receiving ADT.

METHODS

The scale was developed following international recommendations. Moreover, the items were all generated through literature review and referenced questionnaires. After being reviewed by expert panelists, the revised scale was formed and then completed by a convenience sample of 200 prostate cancer patients from our hospital. Explore factor analysis (EFA) was applied to test the construct validity, then split-half reliability, Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability were applied to assess the reliability and stability of the scale.

RESULTS

The revised scale contained 22 items and a total of 200 participants had completed the scale. One hundred participants were randomly selected from the total 200 participants to perform EFA with varimax rotation on the revised scale, and "hot flashes" item was deleted for low factor loading. We selected only 3 items from each factor, then, the final scale was formed with 18-items. We selected another 100 participants to perform the EFA again on the final scale. It was demonstrated that the structure with 6 factors explained 72.5% of total variance and factor loading value was above 0.40 in all items of the factors. Moreover, the split-half reliability coefficient, Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability coefficient were calculated to be 0.74, 0.63, and 0.89, respectively, exhibiting good reliability on the whole.

CONCLUSIONS

The scale was identified to be a valid and reliable instrument to measure QOL for prostate cancer patients receiving ADT. Moreover, further research is needed to overcome the potential drawbacks.

摘要

背景

目前尚无专门的量表用于评估接受雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)的前列腺癌患者的生活质量(QOL)。本研究旨在开发并初步验证用于评估接受 ADT 的前列腺癌患者 QOL 的量表。

方法

该量表是按照国际建议制定的。此外,所有项目均通过文献回顾和参考问卷生成。在经过专家小组审议后,形成了修订后的量表,然后由我院的 200 名前列腺癌患者进行了便利抽样调查。探索性因子分析(EFA)用于检验结构效度,然后进行半分信度、克朗巴赫α系数和重测信度检验,以评估量表的信度和稳定性。

结果

修订后的量表包含 22 个项目,共有 200 名参与者完成了量表。从 200 名参与者中随机抽取 100 名参与者对修订后的量表进行 EFA,并因因子负荷低而删除“热潮红”项目。我们从每个因子中仅选择 3 个项目,然后形成最终的 18 项量表。我们再次从最终量表中选择了另外 100 名参与者进行 EFA。结果表明,6 个因子的结构解释了总方差的 72.5%,所有因子的项目因子负荷值均高于 0.40。此外,半分信度系数、克朗巴赫α系数和重测信度系数分别为 0.74、0.63 和 0.89,总体上具有良好的可靠性。

结论

该量表被确定为一种有效且可靠的工具,用于评估接受 ADT 的前列腺癌患者的 QOL。此外,还需要进一步的研究来克服潜在的缺陷。