Long Mark C, Krause Eleanor
Evans School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0180411. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180411. eCollection 2017.
This study evaluates the extent to which an individual's stated altruistic sentiments can be influenced by context-most importantly, by the age and social proximity of the other person and by the nature of what is being sacrificed. We measure willingness to sacrifice own health for another person's health and willingness to sacrifice own wealth for another person's wealth. To evaluate these sentiments, two surveys were administered to representative samples of Americans which contained hypothetical scenarios with context randomly assigned; the first survey posed a dictator game question and the second survey was designed to elicit marginal rates of substitution between own and other's health/wealth. As expected, we find less altruism towards those who are more socially distant (e.g., strangers relative to family). We find individuals are more health altruistic towards young children and more wealth altruistic towards adults, and health altruism tends to be lowest for survey respondents near retirement age. We find no relationship between levels of altruism and the distance between the respondent's state of birth and state of current residence. These findings improve society's understanding of situational altruism and kinship and reciprocity as motivations for altruism, and they have practical implications concerning the economic valuation of human lives used to guide public policy-making.
本研究评估了个体所表达的利他情感在多大程度上会受到情境的影响——最重要的是,受到他人的年龄和社会亲近程度以及所牺牲事物的性质的影响。我们衡量了为他人健康牺牲自身健康的意愿以及为他人财富牺牲自身财富的意愿。为了评估这些情感,我们对具有代表性的美国样本进行了两项调查,调查包含随机分配情境的假设场景;第一项调查提出了一个独裁者博弈问题,第二项调查旨在得出自身与他人健康/财富之间的边际替代率。正如预期的那样,我们发现对社会距离较远的人(例如,相对于家人的陌生人)利他行为较少。我们发现个体对幼儿的健康利他行为更多,对成年人的财富利他行为更多,并且对于接近退休年龄的调查对象而言,健康利他行为往往最低。我们发现利他水平与调查对象的出生州和当前居住州之间的距离没有关系。这些发现增进了社会对情境利他主义以及作为利他主义动机的亲属关系和互惠性的理解,并且它们对于用于指导公共政策制定的人类生命的经济估值具有实际意义。