Graduate School of Literature and Human Sciences, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.
Department of Psychology, College of Contemporary Psychology, Rikkyo University, Niiza, Japan.
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Jul 23;15(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06148-3.
Researchers have investigated human altruism toward strangers for decades, using economic games such as the dictator game (DG) in their experiments. However, factors that cause the allocating behavior exhibited by those participants willing to be recipients in the DG have not been identified and the psychological mechanism of avoiding decision-making in economic games has not been widely addressed in previous studies. This study aimed to replicate previous findings regarding the number of people who are willing to be assigned the role of recipient and their allocation behavior and to explore why they share more than people who are willing to be dictators.
We demonstrate that there are people willing to be assigned the role of the recipient, rather than the role of the dictator during the dictator game. In addition, we find evidence indicating that people who are willing to be recipients behave more altruistically in the dictator game than those who prefer to be dictators. Based on our results, we argue that willingness to be a recipient, in relation to the psychological unwillingness to assume responsibility and reputational concerns, is a strategic consideration.
研究人员用经济游戏(如独裁者游戏)进行实验,已经研究了几十年人类对陌生人的利他行为。然而,那些愿意在独裁者游戏中充当接受者的参与者所表现出的分配行为的原因尚未确定,并且在以前的研究中,经济游戏中避免决策的心理机制也没有得到广泛关注。本研究旨在复制先前关于愿意扮演接受者角色的人数及其分配行为的发现,并探讨他们为什么比愿意扮演独裁者的人分享更多。
我们证明,在独裁者游戏中,有些人愿意被分配到接受者的角色,而不是独裁者的角色。此外,我们发现的证据表明,在独裁者游戏中,愿意扮演接受者的人比那些更喜欢扮演独裁者的人表现出更多的利他行为。基于我们的结果,我们认为,与不愿承担责任和声誉担忧相关的接受者意愿是一种战略考虑。