Clémence Horaist, Department of Digestive Disease, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Le Raincy-Montfermeil, 93370 Montfermeil, France.
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug 7;23(29):5371-5378. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i29.5371.
To establish consensual definitions of anoperineal lesions of Crohn's (APLOC) disease and assess interobserver agreement on their diagnosis between experts.
A database of digitally recorded pictures of APLOC was examined by a coordinating group who selected two series of 20 pictures illustrating the various aspects of APLOC. A reading group comprised: eight experts from the Société Nationale Française de Colo Proctologie group of study and research in proctology and one academic dermatologist. All members of the coordinating and reading groups participated in dedicated meetings. The coordinating group initially conducted a literature review to analyse verbatim descriptions used to evaluate APLOC. The study included two phases: establishment of consensual definitions using a formal consensus method and later assessment of interobserver agreement on the diagnosis of APLOC using photos of APLOC, a standardised questionnaire and Fleiss's kappa test or descriptive statistics.
Terms used in literature to evaluate visible APLOC did not include precise definitions or reference to definitions. Most of the expert reports on the first set of photos agreed with the main diagnosis but their verbatim reporting contained substantial variation. The definitions of ulceration (entity, depth, extension), anal skin tags (entity, inflammatory activity, ulcerated aspect), fistula (complexity, quality of drainage, inflammatory activity of external openings), perianal skin lesions (abscess, papules, edema, erythema) and anoperineal scars were validated. For fistulae, they decided to follow the American Gastroenterology Association's guidelines definitions. The diagnosis of ulceration (κ = 0.70), fistulae (κ = 0.75), inflammatory activity of external fistula openings (86.6% agreement), abscesses (84.6% agreement) and erythema (100% agreement) achieved a substantial degree of interobserver reproducibility.
This study constructed consensual definitions of APLOC and their characteristics and showed that experts have a fair level of interobserver agreement when using most of the definitions.
确定克罗恩病肛门会阴病变(APLOC)的共识定义,并评估专家之间对这些病变的诊断的一致性。
协调小组检查了肛门会阴病变的数字记录图片数据库,他们选择了两个系列,每个系列包含 20 张图片,展示了肛门会阴病变的各个方面。阅读小组成员包括:法国国家肛肠学会研究和肛肠病学小组的 8 名专家和一位学术皮肤科医生。协调和阅读小组成员都参加了专门的会议。协调小组首先进行了文献回顾,分析了用于评估肛门会阴病变的描述性术语。该研究包括两个阶段:使用正式共识方法建立共识定义,然后使用肛门会阴病变的图片、标准化问卷和 Fleiss'κ检验或描述性统计评估肛门会阴病变的诊断的观察者间一致性。
文献中用于评估可见肛门会阴病变的术语没有包括精确的定义或对定义的参考。大多数关于第一组图片的专家报告与主要诊断相符,但他们的描述性报告存在很大差异。溃疡(实体、深度、范围)、肛门皮肤标签(实体、炎症活动、溃疡性方面)、瘘管(复杂性、引流质量、外部开口的炎症活动)、肛周皮肤病变(脓肿、丘疹、水肿、红斑)和肛门会阴瘢痕的定义得到了验证。对于瘘管,他们决定遵循美国胃肠病学会的指南定义。溃疡(κ=0.70)、瘘管(κ=0.75)、外部瘘管开口的炎症活动(86.6%的一致性)、脓肿(84.6%的一致性)和红斑(100%的一致性)的诊断具有很好的观察者间可重复性。
本研究构建了肛门会阴病变的共识定义及其特征,并表明专家在使用大多数定义时具有相当程度的观察者间一致性。