Suppr超能文献

根据一项新的疾病活动指数衡量,常规疗法可改善肛周克罗恩病。麦克马斯特炎症性肠病研究小组。

Usual therapy improves perianal Crohn's disease as measured by a new disease activity index. McMaster IBD Study Group.

作者信息

Irvine E J

机构信息

Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995 Jan;20(1):27-32.

PMID:7884173
Abstract

Troublesome perianal disease occurs in approximately 35% of patients with Crohn's disease, yet conventional disease activity indices do not reflect the severity of this feature. To assess the degree of impairment and response to therapy, we identified five simple elements and graded each on a 5-point Likert scale in 37 patients at 124 visits. At each visit a Crohn's Disease (CDAI) or Simple Activity Index (HBDAI), Perianal Disease Activity Index (PDAI), and treatment were recorded. The PDAI was validated against physician (MDGA) and patient (PGA) global assessments, and treatment was prescribed for the perianal disease. Measurement error was evaluated in 19 patients who were clinically stable at two consecutive visits. The ability of the PDAI to detect important clinical change was tested in 20 subjects exhibiting a change on PGA at consecutive visits. There were strong correlations between PDAI, MDGA, and PGA scores at all visits (R = 0.66-0.72; p < 0.001), whereas the CDAI and HBDAI correlated poorly with PDAI (R < 0.23). Physicians prescribed more aggressive therapy for higher PDAI scores (r = 0.53). Mean PDAI scores between visits in clinically stable subjects were not significantly different [5.58 +/- 2.79 (initial); 5.42 +/- 2.55 (follow-up); p = 0.63]. PDAI significantly improved between visits when the perianal disease had improved (PDAI score difference 3.05 +/- 2.96; P = .0002). We conclude that the PDAI is simple and clinically useful for patient management. It should now be assessed in a clinical trial.

摘要

约35%的克罗恩病患者会出现令人困扰的肛周疾病,但传统的疾病活动指数并不能反映这一特征的严重程度。为了评估损伤程度和对治疗的反应,我们确定了五个简单要素,并在37例患者的124次就诊中,按照5级李克特量表对每个要素进行评分。每次就诊时均记录克罗恩病活动指数(CDAI)或简易活动指数(HBDAI)、肛周疾病活动指数(PDAI)以及治疗情况。PDAI通过与医生(MDGA)和患者(PGA)的整体评估进行验证,并针对肛周疾病进行治疗。在19例连续两次就诊时临床症状稳定的患者中评估测量误差。在20例连续就诊时PGA出现变化的受试者中测试PDAI检测重要临床变化的能力。所有就诊时PDAI、MDGA和PGA评分之间均存在强相关性(R = 0.66 - 0.72;p < 0.001),而CDAI和HBDAI与PDAI的相关性较差(R < 0.23)。医生会针对更高的PDAI评分开具更积极的治疗方案(r = 0.53)。临床症状稳定的受试者就诊期间的平均PDAI评分无显著差异[5.58 ± 2.79(初始);5.42 ± 2.55(随访);p = 0.63]。当肛周疾病有所改善时,就诊期间PDAI显著改善(PDAI评分差异3.05 ± 2.96;P = 0.0002)。我们得出结论,PDAI简单且对患者管理具有临床实用性。现在应该在一项临床试验中对其进行评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验