• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的比较:两年经验

Comparison of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: Two-year experience.

作者信息

Vollmer Brandi, Nair Kavita V, Sillau Stefan H, Corboy John, Vollmer Timothy, Alvarez Enrique

机构信息

Rocky Mountain MS Center at University of Colorado, USA.

Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Denver, United States.

出版信息

Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 17;3(3):2055217317725102. doi: 10.1177/2055217317725102. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.1177/2055217317725102
PMID:28839949
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5564884/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) are multiple sclerosis (MS) oral therapies that became available in 2010 and 2013, respectively.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to compare discontinuation rates, efficacy, and adverse events (AEs) of FTY and DMF over two years.

METHODS

Patients prescribed FTY or DMF at the Rocky Mountain MS Center at University of Colorado prior to October 2013 were identified. Clinician-reported data were retrospectively collected. Primary outcome was discontinuation of drug by the end of year two. Reasons for discontinuation were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 271 FTY and 342 DMF patients were evaluated. Patients had a mean age of 42.5 (FTY) and 45.8 (DMF) years and were predominantly female (72.0% FTY; 69.6% DMF) and white (86.3% FTY; 82.2% DMF). At ≤24 months, 93 (34.3%) and 161 (47.1%) discontinued FTY and DMF, respectively, with an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 1.70 (1.23-2.37,  = 0.002), or 1.69 (1.16-2.46,  = 0.006) for the doubly robust propensity score weighted estimator. Primary reason for discontinuation was AEs, which were less likely for FTY 46 (17.0%) compared to DMF 82 (24.0%) (OR 1.54, 1.03-2.31,  = 0.035). Discontinuation due to disease activity (FTY (10%) DMF (11.1%); OR 1.13, 0.67-1.90,  = 0.647) and breakthrough disease activity, regardless of discontinuation (FTY (34.7%) DMF (33.6%); OR 0.95, 0.68-1.34,  = 0.783), were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

The odds of discontinuation were less for FTY than DMF, and were driven by AEs for both drugs.

摘要

背景

芬戈莫德(FTY)和富马酸二甲酯(DMF)是分别于2010年和2013年上市的用于治疗多发性硬化症(MS)的口服药物。

目的

本文旨在比较FTY和DMF在两年内的停药率、疗效及不良事件(AE)。

方法

确定2013年10月之前在科罗拉多大学落基山MS中心开具FTY或DMF处方的患者。回顾性收集临床医生报告的数据。主要结局是在第二年年底停药情况。对停药原因进行评估。

结果

共评估了271例FTY患者和342例DMF患者。患者的平均年龄分别为42.5岁(FTY组)和45.8岁(DMF组),且以女性为主(FTY组为72.0%;DMF组为69.6%),白人占多数(FTY组为86.3%;DMF组为82.2%)。在≤24个月时,分别有93例(34.3%)和161例(47.1%)停用FTY和DMF,未调整的优势比(OR)为1.70(1.23 - 2.37,P = 0.002),双重稳健倾向评分加权估计值的OR为1.69(1.16 - 2.46,P = 0.006)。停药的主要原因是AE,FTY组为46例(17.0%),低于DMF组的82例(24.0%)(OR 1.54,1.03 - 2.31,P = 0.035)。因疾病活动导致的停药(FTY组为10%,DMF组为11.1%;OR 1.13,0.67 - 1.90,P = 0.647)以及无论是否停药的突破性疾病活动(FTY组为34.7%,DMF组为33.6%;OR 0.95,0.68 - 1.34,P = 0.783)相似。

结论

FTY停药几率低于DMF,且两种药物的停药均由AE导致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9a0/5564884/66da43751331/10.1177_2055217317725102-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9a0/5564884/193369b1a356/10.1177_2055217317725102-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9a0/5564884/66da43751331/10.1177_2055217317725102-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9a0/5564884/193369b1a356/10.1177_2055217317725102-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b9a0/5564884/66da43751331/10.1177_2055217317725102-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: Two-year experience.芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的比较:两年经验
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 17;3(3):2055217317725102. doi: 10.1177/2055217317725102. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
2
Natalizumab versus fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯在多发性硬化症治疗中的比较。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Dec 9;6(2):252-262. doi: 10.1002/acn3.700. eCollection 2019 Feb.
3
Comparative discontinuation, effectiveness, and switching practices of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod at 36-month follow-up.在 36 个月随访时,二甲基富马酸酯和芬戈莫德的停药、疗效和转换实践比较。
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Dec 15;407:116498. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116498. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
4
Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment.利妥昔单抗与那他珠单抗、芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯在多发性硬化症治疗中的比较。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Sep;7(9):1466-1476. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51111. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
5
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up.在 12 个月的随访中,二甲基富马酸酯和芬戈莫德在临床实践中的疗效和停药比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Nov;10:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod and teriflunomide among MS patients switching from first-generation platform therapies in the US.美国首发平台治疗药物转换的 MS 患者中,富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德和特立氟胺的疗效比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.038. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
7
Discontinuation and comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in 2 centers.富马酸二甲酯和芬戈莫德在两个中心的停药情况及疗效对比
Neurol Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;8(4):292-301. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000487.
8
Persistence to oral disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis patients.多发性硬化症患者对口服疾病修正疗法的坚持。
J Neurol. 2017 Nov;264(11):2325-2329. doi: 10.1007/s00415-017-8595-8. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
9
Effect of tobacco use on disease activity and DMT discontinuation in multiple sclerosis patients treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod.烟草使用对接受富马酸二甲酯或芬戈莫德治疗的多发性硬化症患者疾病活动及疾病修正治疗药物停用的影响
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2020 Oct 13;6(4):2055217320959815. doi: 10.1177/2055217320959815. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
10
A propensity-matched comparison of long-term disability worsening in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod.富马酸二甲酯或芬戈莫德治疗的多发性硬化症患者长期残疾恶化的倾向匹配比较。
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021 Jun 30;14:17562864211021177. doi: 10.1177/17562864211021177. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Fumarates Versus Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor Modulators in Black Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.富马酸盐与1-磷酸鞘氨醇受体调节剂对黑人多发性硬化症患者的疗效比较
Neurol Ther. 2025 Jun 16. doi: 10.1007/s40120-025-00774-2.
2
Real-World Experience with Diroximel Fumarate in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: A Prospective Multicenter Study.多奈哌齐治疗中重度阿尔茨海默病患者的疗效及安全性的多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂平行对照临床研究
Clin Drug Investig. 2024 Nov;44(11):829-838. doi: 10.1007/s40261-024-01397-5. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
3
Comparative efficacy of diroximel fumarate, ozanimod and interferon beta-1a for relapsing multiple sclerosis using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons.使用匹配调整间接比较评估二羟麦角胺富马酸酯、奥扎那林和干扰素 β-1a 在治疗复发型多发性硬化症中的疗效。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Oct;13(10):e230161. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0161. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
4
Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus non-specific immunosuppressants: Real-world evidence from MSBase.富马酸二甲酯与非特异性免疫抑制剂的比较疗效:来自MSBase的真实世界证据。
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2024 May 25;10(2):20552173241247182. doi: 10.1177/20552173241247182. eCollection 2024 Apr-Jun.
5
A comparison of clinical, utilization, and cost outcomes between oral treatments for multiple sclerosis.比较多发性硬化症口服治疗的临床、利用和成本结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Feb 3;30(2):129-140. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.2.129.
6
Safety and Discontinuation Rate of Dimethyl Fumarate (Zadiva) in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: An Observational Retrospective Study.富马酸二甲酯(Zadiva)在多发性硬化症患者中的安全性及停药率:一项观察性回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 27;12(15):4937. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154937.
7
Real-life outcomes for oral disease-modifying treatments of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients: Adherence and adverse event profiles from Marmara University.复发性缓解型多发性硬化症患者口服疾病修正治疗的实际疗效:来自马尔马拉大学的依从性和不良事件特征。
Turk J Med Sci. 2023 Jun;53(3):771-779. doi: 10.55730/1300-0144.5640. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
8
Diroximel Fumarate as a Novel Oral Immunomodulating Therapy for Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review on the Emerging Data.富马酸二甲酯作为一种新型口服免疫调节疗法用于多发性硬化的复发形式:新兴数据的综述。
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022 Nov 10;16:3915-3927. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S236926. eCollection 2022.
9
Real-World Analysis Affirms the High Persistence and Adherence Observed with Diroximel Fumarate in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis.真实世界分析证实了富马酸二甲吡酯在多发性硬化症患者中具有高持续性和依从性。
Neurol Ther. 2023 Feb;12(1):145-159. doi: 10.1007/s40120-022-00413-0. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
10
Overall and patient-level comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod: A precision medicine application to the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques registry.富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德的总体及患者水平的比较疗效:在法国多发性硬化症观察登记处的精准医学应用
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2022 Aug 4;8(3):20552173221116591. doi: 10.1177/20552173221116591. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness Research of Disease-Modifying Therapies for the Management of Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of a Large Health Insurance Claims Database.用于多发性硬化症管理的疾病修饰疗法的比较有效性研究:对一个大型健康保险理赔数据库的分析
Neurol Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):91-102. doi: 10.1007/s40120-017-0064-x. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
2
Age Related Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score: Disability ranked by age.年龄相关多发性硬化严重程度评分:按年龄分级的残疾程度。
Mult Scler. 2017 Dec;23(14):1938-1946. doi: 10.1177/1352458517690618. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
3
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up.在 12 个月的随访中,二甲基富马酸酯和芬戈莫德在临床实践中的疗效和停药比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Nov;10:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Comparative effectiveness using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison between delayed-release dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.使用匹配调整间接比较来评估富马酸二甲酯缓释剂与芬戈莫德治疗多发性硬化症的相对疗效。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Feb;33(2):175-183. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1248380. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
5
Comparative efficacy of disease-modifying therapies for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较缓解复发型多发性硬化症患者疾病修饰疗法的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Sep;9:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
6
The real-world patient experience of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate for multiple sclerosis.芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的真实世界患者体验。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Sep 7;9(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2243-8.
7
Therapy satisfaction and adherence in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: the THEPA-MS survey.复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的治疗满意度与依从性:THEPA-MS调查
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2016 Jul;9(4):250-63. doi: 10.1177/1756285616634247. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
8
Long-term cardiac safety and tolerability of fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: A postmarketing study.芬戈莫德治疗多发性硬化症的长期心脏安全性和耐受性:一项上市后研究。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2015 Oct;55(10):1131-6. doi: 10.1002/jcph.519. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
9
Persistence with and adherence to fingolimod compared with other disease-modifying therapies for the treatment of multiple sclerosis: a retrospective US claims database analysis.与其他改善病情疗法相比,芬戈莫德治疗多发性硬化症的持续用药和依从性:一项美国索赔数据库回顾性分析
J Med Econ. 2014 Oct;17(10):696-707. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.940422. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
10
Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (FREEDOMS II): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.芬戈莫德治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的安全性和疗效(FREEDOMS II):一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照、3 期临床试验。
Lancet Neurol. 2014 Jun;13(6):545-56. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70049-3. Epub 2014 Mar 28.