• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德的总体及患者水平的比较疗效:在法国多发性硬化症观察登记处的精准医学应用

Overall and patient-level comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod: A precision medicine application to the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques registry.

作者信息

Simoneau Gabrielle, Jiang Xiaotong, Rollot Fabien, Tian Lu, Copetti Massimiliano, Guéry Matthieu, Ruiz Marta, Vukusic Sandra, de Moor Carl, Pellegrini Fabio

机构信息

Biogen Canada, Mississauga, ON, Canada.

Biogen Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA.

出版信息

Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2022 Aug 4;8(3):20552173221116591. doi: 10.1177/20552173221116591. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.

DOI:10.1177/20552173221116591
PMID:35959484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9358343/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Comparing real-world effectiveness and tolerability of therapies for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis is increasingly important, though average treatment effects fail to capture possible treatment effect heterogeneity. With the clinical course of the disease being highly heterogeneous across patients, precision medicine methods enable treatment response heterogeneity investigations.

OBJECTIVE

To compare real-world effectiveness and discontinuation profiles between dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod while investigating treatment effect heterogeneity with precision medicine methods.

METHODS

Adults initiating dimethyl fumarate or fingolimod as a second-line therapy were selected from a French registry. The primary outcome was annualized relapse rate at 12 months. Seven secondary outcomes relative to discontinuation and disease progression were considered. A precision medicine framework was used to characterize treatment effect heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Annualized relapse rates at 12 months were similar for dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod. The odd of treatment persistence was 47% lower for patients treated with dimethyl fumarate relative to those treated with fingolimod (odds ratio: 0.53, 95% confidence interval: 0.39, 0.70). None of the five precision medicine scoring approaches identified treatment heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

These findings substantiated the similar effectiveness and different discontinuation profiles for dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod as a second-line therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, with no significant effect heterogeneity observed.

摘要

背景

比较复发缓解型多发性硬化症治疗方法的真实世界有效性和耐受性变得越来越重要,尽管平均治疗效果无法捕捉到可能存在的治疗效果异质性。由于该疾病的临床病程在患者中高度异质,精准医学方法有助于对治疗反应异质性进行研究。

目的

比较富马酸二甲酯和芬戈莫德的真实世界有效性和停药情况,同时用精准医学方法研究治疗效果异质性。

方法

从法国一个登记处选取开始使用富马酸二甲酯或芬戈莫德作为二线治疗的成年人。主要结局是12个月时的年化复发率。还考虑了7个与停药和疾病进展相关的次要结局。使用一个精准医学框架来描述治疗效果异质性。

结果

富马酸二甲酯和芬戈莫德在12个月时的年化复发率相似。接受富马酸二甲酯治疗的患者持续治疗的几率比接受芬戈莫德治疗的患者低47%(优势比:0.53,95%置信区间:0.39,0.70)。五种精准医学评分方法均未发现治疗异质性。

结论

这些发现证实了富马酸二甲酯和芬戈莫德作为复发缓解型多发性硬化症二线治疗方法具有相似的有效性和不同的停药情况,未观察到显著的效果异质性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/610f/9358343/d6ebbdfed115/10.1177_20552173221116591-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/610f/9358343/949b38fd4b8c/10.1177_20552173221116591-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/610f/9358343/d6ebbdfed115/10.1177_20552173221116591-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/610f/9358343/949b38fd4b8c/10.1177_20552173221116591-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/610f/9358343/d6ebbdfed115/10.1177_20552173221116591-fig2.jpg

相似文献

1
Overall and patient-level comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod: A precision medicine application to the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques registry.富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德的总体及患者水平的比较疗效:在法国多发性硬化症观察登记处的精准医学应用
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2022 Aug 4;8(3):20552173221116591. doi: 10.1177/20552173221116591. eCollection 2022 Jul-Sep.
2
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 24-month follow-up.富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德在临床实践中24个月随访时的疗效比较及停药情况
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 24;3(3):2055217317715485. doi: 10.1177/2055217317715485. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
3
Comparative analysis of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.二羟戊酸和芬戈莫德在复发缓解型多发性硬化中的比较分析。
J Neurol. 2021 Mar;268(3):941-949. doi: 10.1007/s00415-020-10226-6. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
4
Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab and Other Initial Treatment Choices for Multiple Sclerosis.利妥昔单抗与其他多发性硬化初始治疗选择的疗效比较。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 1;75(3):320-327. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4011.
5
The real-world patient experience of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate for multiple sclerosis.芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的真实世界患者体验。
BMC Res Notes. 2016 Sep 7;9(1):434. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2243-8.
6
Comparison of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.比较芬戈莫德、二甲基富马酸酯和特立氟胺治疗多发性硬化症。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;90(4):458-468. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319831. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
7
Comparative effectiveness using a matching-adjusted indirect comparison between delayed-release dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod for the treatment of multiple sclerosis.使用匹配调整间接比较来评估富马酸二甲酯缓释剂与芬戈莫德治疗多发性硬化症的相对疗效。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 Feb;33(2):175-183. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2016.1248380. Epub 2016 Nov 10.
8
Comparative effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate versus interferon, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or fingolimod: results from the German NeuroTransData registry.延迟释放二甲基富马酸酯与干扰素、那他珠单抗、特立氟胺或芬戈莫德的比较效果:来自德国神经 TransData 登记处的结果。
J Neurol. 2018 Dec;265(12):2980-2992. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-9083-5. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
9
Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate as the initial and secondary treatment for MS.二甲基富马酸作为 MS 初始和二线治疗的比较效果。
Mult Scler. 2020 Oct;26(12):1532-1539. doi: 10.1177/1352458519866600. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
10
Comparative effectiveness of teriflunomide vs dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis.特立氟胺与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的疗效比较。
Neurology. 2019 Aug 13;93(7):e635-e646. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007938. Epub 2019 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Who Benefited Most from the Internet-Based Conversational Engagement RCT (I-CONECT)? Application of the Personalized Medicine Approach to a Behavioral Intervention Study.基于互联网的对话式参与随机对照试验(I-CONECT)中谁受益最多?个性化医疗方法在行为干预研究中的应用。
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2024;11(3):639-648. doi: 10.14283/jpad.2024.41.
2
A comparison of clinical, utilization, and cost outcomes between oral treatments for multiple sclerosis.比较多发性硬化症口服治疗的临床、利用和成本结果。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Feb 3;30(2):129-140. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.2.129.

本文引用的文献

1
Estimation and Validation of Ratio-based Conditional Average Treatment Effects Using Observational Data.使用观测数据对基于比率的条件平均治疗效果进行估计与验证
J Am Stat Assoc. 2021;116(533):335-352. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2020.1772080. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
2
Comparative discontinuation, effectiveness, and switching practices of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod at 36-month follow-up.在 36 个月随访时,二甲基富马酸酯和芬戈莫德的停药、疗效和转换实践比较。
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Dec 15;407:116498. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116498. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
3
A proof-of-concept application of a novel scoring approach for personalized medicine in multiple sclerosis.
一种用于多发性硬化症个性化医疗的新型评分方法的概念验证应用。
Mult Scler. 2020 Aug;26(9):1064-1073. doi: 10.1177/1352458519849513. Epub 2019 May 30.
4
Reaching an evidence-based prognosis for personalized treatment of multiple sclerosis.为多发性硬化症的个性化治疗制定基于证据的预后。
Nat Rev Neurol. 2019 May;15(5):287-300. doi: 10.1038/s41582-019-0170-8.
5
Comparison of fingolimod, dimethyl fumarate and teriflunomide for multiple sclerosis.比较芬戈莫德、二甲基富马酸酯和特立氟胺治疗多发性硬化症。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;90(4):458-468. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319831. Epub 2019 Jan 13.
6
Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP): A unique multimodal nationwide MS registry in France.法国多发性硬化症观察站(OFSEP):法国独一无二的全国性多发性硬化症多模式注册中心。
Mult Scler. 2020 Jan;26(1):118-122. doi: 10.1177/1352458518815602. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
7
Comparative effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate versus interferon, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or fingolimod: results from the German NeuroTransData registry.延迟释放二甲基富马酸酯与干扰素、那他珠单抗、特立氟胺或芬戈莫德的比较效果:来自德国神经 TransData 登记处的结果。
J Neurol. 2018 Dec;265(12):2980-2992. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-9083-5. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
8
Discontinuation and comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in 2 centers.富马酸二甲酯和芬戈莫德在两个中心的停药情况及疗效对比
Neurol Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;8(4):292-301. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000487.
9
Fingolimod vs dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis: A real-world propensity score-matched study.芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症:一项真实世界的倾向评分匹配研究。
Neurology. 2018 Jul 10;91(2):e153-e161. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005772. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
10
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 24-month follow-up.富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德在临床实践中24个月随访时的疗效比较及停药情况
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 24;3(3):2055217317715485. doi: 10.1177/2055217317715485. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.