• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯在多发性硬化症治疗中的比较。

Natalizumab versus fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment.

机构信息

Division of Neuroimmunology Department of Neurology Rocky Mountain Multiple Sclerosis Center at the University of Colorado Aurora Colorado.

Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences University of Colorado Aurora Colorado.

出版信息

Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Dec 9;6(2):252-262. doi: 10.1002/acn3.700. eCollection 2019 Feb.

DOI:10.1002/acn3.700
PMID:30847358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6389745/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare 2-year effectiveness and discontinuation of natalizumab (NTZ) versus fingolimod (FTY) and dimethyl fumarate (DMF) in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS).

METHODS

Patients prescribed NTZ, FTY, or DMF at the Rocky Mountain MS Center at University of Colorado were identified. Clinician-reported data were retrospectively collected. Outcomes include a composite effectiveness measure consisting of new T2 lesion, gadolinium-enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse, individual effectiveness outcomes and discontinuation over 2 years. Logistic regression was used for data analysis on patients matched by propensity scores and using ATT doubly robust weighting estimator.

RESULTS

A total of 451, 271, and 342 patients were evaluated on NTZ, FTY, and DMF over 2 years, respectively. Patients had a mean age of 39.8 (NTZ), 42.5(FTY), and 45.8 (DMF) years; were predominantly female (76.7% NTZ; 72.0% FTY; 69.6% DMF); and had a mean MS disease duration of 11-12 years for all groups. At ≤24 months, 22.2%, 34.7%, and 33.6% experienced a new T2 lesion, gadolinium-enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse on NTZ, FTY, and DMF, respectively. Using ATT doubly robust weighting estimator, FTY versus NTZ and DMF versus NTZ had an odds ratio of 2.00 (95%CI:[1.41-2.85],  < 0.001) and 2.38 [95% CI: 1.68-3.37],  < 0.001) respectively, for experiencing a new T2 lesion, gadolinium enhancing lesion, and/or clinical relapse. At ≤24 months, 32.6%, 34.3%, and 47.1% discontinued NTZ, FTY, and DMF, respectively. The majority of discontinuations were due to becoming JCV positive(12.6%) for NTZ and due to adverse events for both FTY(17%) and DMF(24.0%).

INTERPRETATION

NTZ appears to be more effective and tolerable than FTY and DMF.

摘要

目的

比较纳武利尤单抗(NTZ)、芬戈莫德(FTY)和二甲基富马酸(DMF)治疗多发性硬化症(MS)的 2 年疗效和停药率。

方法

在科罗拉多大学洛基山 MS 中心,确定了接受 NTZ、FTY 或 DMF 治疗的患者。回顾性收集临床医生报告的数据。结果包括新 T2 病变、钆增强病变和/或临床复发的综合有效措施、个体有效结果和 2 年内停药率。采用倾向评分匹配的逻辑回归分析和 ATT 双重稳健加权估计进行数据分析。

结果

在 2 年内,分别有 451、271 和 342 例患者接受了 NTZ、FTY 和 DMF 治疗。患者的平均年龄分别为 39.8(NTZ)、42.5(FTY)和 45.8(DMF)岁;均为女性(76.7% NTZ;72.0% FTY;69.6% DMF);MS 病程平均为 11-12 年。在≤24 个月时,NTZ、FTY 和 DMF 组分别有 22.2%、34.7%和 33.6%的患者出现新 T2 病变、钆增强病变和/或临床复发。使用 ATT 双重稳健加权估计,FTY 与 NTZ 和 DMF 与 NTZ 相比,新 T2 病变、钆增强病变和/或临床复发的比值比分别为 2.00(95%CI:[1.41-2.85],<0.001)和 2.38[95%CI:1.68-3.37],<0.001)。在≤24 个月时,NTZ、FTY 和 DMF 组分别有 32.6%、34.3%和 47.1%的患者停药。大多数停药是由于 JCV 阳性(NTZ 组 12.6%)和不良反应(FTY 组 17%和 DMF 组 24.0%)。

结论

NTZ 似乎比 FTY 和 DMF 更有效和耐受。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d9/6389745/61be5d1c822e/ACN3-6-252-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d9/6389745/a76eb292a8ce/ACN3-6-252-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d9/6389745/4cabe96c5dc3/ACN3-6-252-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d9/6389745/61be5d1c822e/ACN3-6-252-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d9/6389745/a76eb292a8ce/ACN3-6-252-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d9/6389745/4cabe96c5dc3/ACN3-6-252-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93d9/6389745/61be5d1c822e/ACN3-6-252-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Natalizumab versus fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment.那他珠单抗与芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯在多发性硬化症治疗中的比较。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018 Dec 9;6(2):252-262. doi: 10.1002/acn3.700. eCollection 2019 Feb.
2
Rituximab versus natalizumab, fingolimod, and dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis treatment.利妥昔单抗与那他珠单抗、芬戈莫德和富马酸二甲酯在多发性硬化症治疗中的比较。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Sep;7(9):1466-1476. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51111. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
3
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 12-month follow-up.在 12 个月的随访中,二甲基富马酸酯和芬戈莫德在临床实践中的疗效和停药比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Nov;10:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.08.002. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
4
Comparative discontinuation, effectiveness, and switching practices of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod at 36-month follow-up.在 36 个月随访时,二甲基富马酸酯和芬戈莫德的停药、疗效和转换实践比较。
J Neurol Sci. 2019 Dec 15;407:116498. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116498. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
5
Comparative effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate versus fingolimod and teriflunomide among MS patients switching from first-generation platform therapies in the US.美国首发平台治疗药物转换的 MS 患者中,富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德和特立氟胺的疗效比较。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2019 Jan;27:101-111. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.09.038. Epub 2018 Oct 10.
6
Dimethyl fumarate vs fingolimod following different pretreatments: A retrospective study.富马酸二甲酯与不同预处理后的芬戈莫德:一项回顾性研究。
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2020 Jan 14;7(2). doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000660. Print 2020 Mar.
7
Effectiveness and baseline factors associated to fingolimod response in a real-world study on multiple sclerosis patients.在一项多发性硬化症患者的真实世界研究中,评估芬戈莫德有效性的相关因素及基础情况。
J Neurol. 2018 Apr;265(4):896-905. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8791-1. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
8
Switching from natalizumab to fingolimod treatment in multiple sclerosis: real life data from the Austrian MS Treatment Registry.从那他珠单抗转换为多发性硬化症的芬戈莫德治疗:来自奥地利多发性硬化症治疗登记处的真实数据。
J Neurol. 2019 Nov;266(11):2672-2677. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09464-0. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
9
Comparison of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: Two-year experience.芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的比较:两年经验
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 17;3(3):2055217317725102. doi: 10.1177/2055217317725102. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
10
Dimethyl fumarate: a possible exit strategy from natalizumab treatment in patients with multiple sclerosis at risk for severe adverse events.富马酸二甲酯:多发性硬化症高危严重不良事件患者停用那他珠单抗的可能策略。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2017 Dec;88(12):1073-1078. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2017-316236. Epub 2017 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The relative risk of infection in people with multiple sclerosis using disease-modifying treatment: a systematic review of observational studies.使用疾病修正治疗的多发性硬化症患者的感染相对风险:观察性研究的系统评价
Neurol Sci. 2025 Jun;46(6):2555-2569. doi: 10.1007/s10072-025-08018-9. Epub 2025 Feb 8.
2
Switching from injectable to other Disease Modifying Therapies may improve sexual dysfunction in people with Multiple Sclerosis.从注射用药物改为其他疾病修正疗法可能会改善多发性硬化症患者的性功能障碍。
BMC Neurol. 2024 Jul 24;24(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12883-024-03765-2.
3
Risk of T lesions when discontinuing fingolimod: a nationwide predictive and comparative study.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Effectiveness of Rituximab and Other Initial Treatment Choices for Multiple Sclerosis.利妥昔单抗与其他多发性硬化初始治疗选择的疗效比较。
JAMA Neurol. 2018 Mar 1;75(3):320-327. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.4011.
2
Treatment satisfaction across injectable, infusion, and oral disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis.多发性硬化症的注射、输注和口服疾病修正治疗的治疗满意度。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017 Nov;18:196-201. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
3
Persistence with dimethyl fumarate in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a population-based cohort study.
停用芬戈莫德时出现T病变的风险:一项全国性预测与比较研究。
Brain Commun. 2024 Jan 2;6(1):fcad358. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad358. eCollection 2024.
4
Safety and Discontinuation Rate of Dimethyl Fumarate (Zadiva) in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: An Observational Retrospective Study.富马酸二甲酯(Zadiva)在多发性硬化症患者中的安全性及停药率:一项观察性回顾性研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 27;12(15):4937. doi: 10.3390/jcm12154937.
5
The comparative effectiveness of fingolimod, natalizumab, and ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.芬戈莫德、那他珠单抗和奥瑞珠单抗在复发缓解型多发性硬化症中的比较疗效。
Neurol Sci. 2023 Jun;44(6):2121-2129. doi: 10.1007/s10072-023-06608-z. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
6
Integrin-directed antibody-based immunotherapy: focus on VLA-4.整合素导向的基于抗体的免疫疗法:聚焦于VLA-4
Immunother Adv. 2021 Feb 9;1(1):ltab002. doi: 10.1093/immadv/ltab002. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Assessment of fingolimod versus dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of multiple sclerosis; a 24-month follow-up study.芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的疗效评估:一项24个月的随访研究。
Am J Clin Exp Immunol. 2021 Oct 15;10(3):86-92. eCollection 2021.
8
Comparison of Dimethyl Fumarate vs Fingolimod and Rituximab vs Natalizumab for Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis.二甲基富马酸与芬戈莫德和利妥昔单抗与那他珠单抗治疗多发性硬化症的比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Nov 1;4(11):e2134627. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34627.
9
Translational value of choroid plexus imaging for tracking neuroinflammation in mice and humans.脉络丛成像在小鼠和人类神经炎症追踪中的转化价值。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 7;118(36). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2025000118.
10
Multiple Sclerosis in Saudi Arabia: Clinical, Social, and Psychological Aspects of the Disease.沙特阿拉伯的多发性硬化症:该疾病的临床、社会和心理方面
Cureus. 2021 Jul 19;13(7):e16484. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16484. eCollection 2021 Jul.
富马酸二甲酯用于复发缓解型多发性硬化症的持续性:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Feb;74(2):219-226. doi: 10.1007/s00228-017-2366-4. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
4
Comparative efficacy and discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and fingolimod in clinical practice at 24-month follow-up.富马酸二甲酯与芬戈莫德在临床实践中24个月随访时的疗效比较及停药情况
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 24;3(3):2055217317715485. doi: 10.1177/2055217317715485. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
5
Comparison of fingolimod and dimethyl fumarate in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: Two-year experience.芬戈莫德与富马酸二甲酯治疗多发性硬化症的比较:两年经验
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2017 Aug 17;3(3):2055217317725102. doi: 10.1177/2055217317725102. eCollection 2017 Jul-Sep.
6
Classifying PML risk with disease modifying therapies.使用疾病修饰疗法对进行性多灶性白质脑病风险进行分类。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017 Feb;12:59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
7
Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis.奥瑞珠单抗与干扰素β-1a 治疗复发型多发性硬化症的疗效比较。
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jan 19;376(3):221-234. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1601277. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
8
Comparative efficacy of disease-modifying therapies for patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis: Systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较缓解复发型多发性硬化症患者疾病修饰疗法的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Sep;9:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2016.06.001. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
9
A comparison of multiple sclerosis clinical disease activity between patients treated with natalizumab and fingolimod.那他珠单抗和芬戈莫德治疗的患者之间多发性硬化临床疾病活动度的比较。
Mult Scler. 2017 Feb;23(2):234-241. doi: 10.1177/1352458516643393. Epub 2016 Jul 11.
10
Therapy with natalizumab is associated with high JCV seroconversion and rising JCV index values.那他珠单抗治疗与高 JCV 血清转化率和 JCV 指数升高有关。
Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2016 Jan 27;3(1):e195. doi: 10.1212/NXI.0000000000000195. eCollection 2016 Feb.