• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙科基础培训两地点试点模式的评估

An evaluation of a two-site pilot model for dental foundation training.

作者信息

Ali K, Khan S, Briggs P, Jones E

机构信息

Plymouth University, Peninsula Dental School, C523 Portland Square, Peninsula Schools of Medicine &Dentistry, Plymouth, Devon, PL4 8AA.

Health Education England London and South East, Stewart House, 32 Russell Square, London, WC1B 5DN.

出版信息

Br Dent J. 2017 Aug 25;223(4):287-292. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.714.

DOI:10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.714
PMID:28840871
Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility, strengths, weaknesses, and challenges of a two-site model of dental foundation training.Methods A mixed methods approach was used to evaluate the two-site pilot. Qualitative interviews and focus groups were employed to gain an in-depth understanding of the expectations, experiences and concerns of the stakeholders. Additionally, purposefully designed questionnaires were used to rate different elements of the training.Results Participants included 12 foundation dentists, 15 educational supervisors and seven assistant educational supervisors. An increased breadth of clinical experience, a more variable case-mix, feedback from two teams of supervisors, and the experience of working within two different practices with two different teams and cultures were perceived to be the main strengths. The key challenges reported by the trainers were increased workload, a perceived disruption to the continuity of patient-care and perceived difficulties in establishing professional relationships.Conclusions This paper reports on the evaluation of a new model of dental foundation training in London. It highlights potential advantages and drawbacks of providing dental foundation training in two dental practices. Given the limitations of the of evaluation reported in this paper, additional work is required to establish the feasibility and effectiveness of the two-site training model.

摘要

目的 评估牙科基础培训双地点模式的可行性、优势、劣势及挑战。方法 采用混合方法对双地点试点进行评估。通过定性访谈和焦点小组深入了解利益相关者的期望、经历和担忧。此外,还使用了专门设计的问卷对培训的不同要素进行评分。结果 参与者包括12名基础牙医、15名教育督导员和7名助理教育督导员。临床经验广度增加、病例组合更多样化、来自两组督导员的反馈以及在两种不同的机构中与两个不同团队和文化合作的经历被视为主要优势。培训人员报告的主要挑战是工作量增加、患者护理连续性受到干扰以及建立专业关系存在困难。结论 本文报告了对伦敦一种新型牙科基础培训模式的评估。它突出了在两个牙科机构提供牙科基础培训的潜在优势和缺点。鉴于本文报告的评估存在局限性,需要开展更多工作来确定双地点培训模式的可行性和有效性。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of a two-site pilot model for dental foundation training.牙科基础培训两地点试点模式的评估
Br Dent J. 2017 Aug 25;223(4):287-292. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.714.
2
Enhanced skills in periodontology: evaluation of a pilot scheme for general dental practitioners and dental care professionals in London.牙周病学技能提升:伦敦全科牙医和牙科护理专业人员试点计划评估
Br Dent J. 2017 May 12;222(9):700-707. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.404.
3
Evaluation of workplace based assessment tools in dental foundation training.口腔基础培训中基于工作场所评估工具的评估。
Br Dent J. 2011 Aug 26;211(4):E8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.681.
4
Skill shortages in health: innovative solutions using vocational education and training.卫生领域的技能短缺:利用职业教育与培训的创新解决方案。
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Jan-Mar;7(1):623. Epub 2007 Feb 1.
5
Experience of undergraduates from three London dental schools and trainers from the south east of England on interviews for vocational training in 1996.1996年,来自伦敦三所牙科学院的本科生和英格兰东南部培训师在职业培训面试方面的经历。
Br Dent J. 1997 Oct 25;183(8):284-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809496.
6
Undergraduate training as preparation for vocational training in England: a survey of vocational dental practitioners' and their trainers' views.英国本科培训作为职业培训的准备:对牙科职业从业者及其培训师观点的调查。
Br Dent J. 2006 Sep;Suppl:9-15. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4814067.
7
Evaluation of vocational training of dentists in three different regions.三个不同地区牙医职业培训的评估。
Br Dent J. 2006 Dec 23;201(12):774-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4814262.
8
Could situational judgement tests be used for selection into dental foundation training?情境判断测试能否用于选拔进入牙科基础培训?
Br Dent J. 2012 Jul 13;213(1):23-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2012.560.
9
A question of value: a qualitative study of vocational dental practitioners' views on oral healthcare systems and their future careers.价值问题:对牙科职业从业者关于口腔医疗保健系统及其未来职业看法的定性研究
Prim Dent Care. 2009 Jan;16(1):29-37. doi: 10.1308/135576109786994550.
10
Exploring the views of second-year Foundation Programme doctors and their educational supervisors during a deanery-wide pilot Foundation Programme.在全地区范围内试行的基础培训项目中,探究二年级基础培训医生及其教育督导的观点。
Postgrad Med J. 2006 Dec;82(974):813-6. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.2006.049676.

引用本文的文献

1
The evaluation of an innovative dental nurse training pilot scheme.一项创新性牙科护士培训试点计划的评估。
Br Dent J. 2018 Jun 8;224(11):875-880. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2018.433. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Mind the gap: Are dental trainees satisfied with their clinical experience?注意差距:牙科实习生对他们的临床经验满意吗?
Br Dent J. 2016 Oct 7;221(7):406. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.728.
2
An investigation of the clinical experiences of dentists within the national dental foundation training programme in the North West of England.对英格兰西北部国家牙科基金会培训项目中牙医临床经验的调查。
Br Dent J. 2016 Sep 23;221(6):323-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.683.
3
Medical students developing confidence and patient centredness in diverse clinical settings: a longitudinal survey study.
医学生在不同临床环境中培养信心和以患者为中心的意识:一项纵向调查研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 15;16:176. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0689-y.
4
Feedback-giving behaviour in performance evaluations during clinical clerkships.临床实习期间绩效评估中的反馈行为。
Med Teach. 2016;38(1):88-95. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1017448. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
5
An investigation of complete denture teaching in the UK: part 2. The DF1 experience.英国全口义齿教学调查:第2部分。DF1的经验。
Br Dent J. 2013 Sep;215(5):229-36. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2013.833.
6
A systematic review of the relationship between patient mix and learning in work-based clinical settings. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 24.基于工作场所的临床环境中患者构成与学习之间关系的系统评价。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 24 号。
Med Teach. 2013 Jun;35(6):e1181-96. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.797570.
7
An evaluation of the use of the mini-CEX in the foundation programme.对基础培训项目中迷你临床演练评估工具(mini-CEX)使用情况的评估。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2010 Oct;71(10):584-8. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2010.71.10.78949.
8
Workplace learning in general practice: supervision, patient mix and independence emerge from the black box once again.全科医学中的工作场所学习:监管、患者构成和独立性再次从黑箱中浮现。
Med Teach. 2010;32(7):e294-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.489128.
9
State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback.卫生专业教育的科学现状:有效反馈。
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):101-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x.
10
Portfolio learning for foundation doctors: early feedback on its use in the clinical workplace.基础医生的组合式学习:关于其在临床工作场所使用情况的早期反馈
Med Educ. 2008 Feb;42(2):214-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02960.x.