• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

体重指数>30kg/m²与≤30kg/m²的外周动脉疾病患者经皮血管重建术后院内结局比较(来自全国住院患者样本)

Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes After Percutaneous Revascularization for Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients With a Body Mass Index of >30 kg/m Versus ≤30 kg/m (from the National Inpatient Sample).

作者信息

Doshi Rajkumar, Rao Gaurav, Shlofmitz Evan, Donnelly Joseph, Meraj Perwaiz

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, North Shore University Hospital, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York.

Division of Cardiology, North Shore University Hospital, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, New York.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1648-1652. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.065. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.065
PMID:28842147
Abstract

Obesity is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality which may affect the outcomes of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). However, the exact role of obesity in patients with PAD who underwent percutaneous revascularization is not well defined. We sought to analyze in-hospital outcomes and characteristics in obese patients who underwent percutaneous treatment for PAD. We identified study cohorts who underwent percutaneous treatment for PAD from 2012 to 2014 using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnostic and procedures codes specific for PAD and endovascular treatment. Endovascular treatment included a drug-eluting stent, a bare metal stent, and an atherectomy or angioplasty in the lower extremities. Obesity was defined as a body mass index of >30 kg/m. Patients below 18 years of age were excluded. A total of 62,445 (weighted 312,225) patients were identified. The mean age was higher in the nonobese group (64.2 vs 69.0 years, p ≤0.001). No difference existed in the primary outcome, in-hospital mortality, with the propensity score matched (1:10) analysis. Renal failure and the composite of complications were increased in obese patients. Percutaneous treatment of PAD was associated with increased length of stay (7.7 vs 7.0 days, p ≤0.001) and median cost of hospitalization ($30,602 vs $28,692, p ≤0.001) in obese patients. In conclusion, obesity did not impact in-hospital mortality in patients who underwent peripheral percutaneous revascularization. Increased adverse events, however, were seen in the obese population. The increased cost associated with the hospitalization of obese patients may be attributed to longer length of stay and greater complication.

摘要

肥胖是心血管疾病和死亡的独立危险因素,可能影响外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者的治疗结果。然而,肥胖在接受经皮血管重建术的PAD患者中的确切作用尚不清楚。我们试图分析接受PAD经皮治疗的肥胖患者的住院结局和特征。我们使用国际疾病分类第九版临床修订本(ICD-9-CM)中特定于PAD和血管内治疗的诊断和手术编码,确定了2012年至2014年接受PAD经皮治疗的研究队列。血管内治疗包括药物洗脱支架、裸金属支架以及下肢的旋切术或血管成形术。肥胖定义为体重指数>30kg/m²。排除18岁以下的患者。共确定了62445例(加权后为312225例)患者。非肥胖组的平均年龄较高(64.2岁对69.0岁,p≤0.001)。倾向评分匹配(1:10)分析显示,主要结局即住院死亡率无差异。肥胖患者的肾衰竭和并发症综合发生率增加。肥胖患者接受PAD经皮治疗后住院时间延长(7.7天对7.0天,p≤0.001),住院费用中位数增加(30602美元对28692美元,p≤0.001)。总之,肥胖并未影响接受外周经皮血管重建术患者的住院死亡率。然而,肥胖人群中不良事件增加。肥胖患者住院费用增加可能归因于住院时间延长和并发症增多。

相似文献

1
Comparison of In-Hospital Outcomes After Percutaneous Revascularization for Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients With a Body Mass Index of >30 kg/m Versus ≤30 kg/m (from the National Inpatient Sample).体重指数>30kg/m²与≤30kg/m²的外周动脉疾病患者经皮血管重建术后院内结局比较(来自全国住院患者样本)
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1648-1652. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.065. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
2
Utilization and in-hospital outcomes associated with atherectomy in the treatment of peripheral vascular disease: An observational analysis from the National Inpatient Sample.血管腔内斑块旋切术治疗外周血管疾病的应用及院内结局:一项来自全国住院患者样本的观察性分析
Vascular. 2018 Oct;26(5):464-471. doi: 10.1177/1708538118760135. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Gender disparities among patients with peripheral arterial disease treated via endovascular approach: A propensity score matched analysis.经血管内介入治疗的外周动脉疾病患者的性别差异:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
J Interv Cardiol. 2017 Dec;30(6):604-611. doi: 10.1111/joic.12431. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
4
Nationwide Trends of Hospital Admission and Outcomes Among Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: From 2003-2011.全国范围内重症肢体缺血患者住院和结局的趋势:2003-2011 年。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Apr 26;67(16):1901-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.02.040. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
5
Association Between Underweight Body Mass Index and In-Hospital Outcome in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Interventions for Peripheral Artery Disease: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.体重过轻的身体质量指数与接受外周动脉疾病血管内介入治疗患者的院内结局之间的关联:一项倾向评分匹配分析
J Endovasc Ther. 2019 Jun;26(3):411-417. doi: 10.1177/1526602819839046. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
6
Comparison of Outcomes and Cost of Endovascular Management Versus Surgical Bypass for the Management of Lower Extremities Peripheral Arterial Disease.腔内治疗与手术旁路治疗下肢外周动脉疾病的结局和成本比较。
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Nov 15;122(10):1790-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2018.08.018. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
7
In-Hospital Outcomes of Atherectomy During Endovascular Lower Extremity Revascularization.下肢血管腔内再血管化术中旋切术的院内结局
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 15;117(4):676-684. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.11.025. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
8
Comparison of Inhospital Outcomes and Hospitalization Costs of Peripheral Angioplasty and Endovascular Stenting.外周血管成形术与血管内支架置入术的住院结局及住院费用比较
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Aug 15;116(4):634-41. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.05.031. Epub 2015 May 29.
9
Heparin-bonded covered stents versus bare-metal stents for complex femoropopliteal artery lesions: the randomized VIASTAR trial (Viabahn endoprosthesis with PROPATEN bioactive surface [VIA] versus bare nitinol stent in the treatment of long lesions in superficial femoral artery occlusive disease).肝素结合涂层支架与裸金属支架治疗复杂股腘动脉病变的随机对照试验(Viabahn 覆膜支架联合 PROPATEN 生物活性表面[VIA]与裸钽支架治疗股浅动脉闭塞性疾病长段病变的疗效比较[VIASTAR 试验])。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 8;62(15):1320-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.079. Epub 2013 Jul 10.
10
Impact of obesity on revascularization and restenosis rates after bare-metal and drug-eluting stent implantation (from the TAXUS-IV trial).肥胖对裸金属支架和药物洗脱支架植入术后血管重建及再狭窄率的影响(来自TAXUS-IV试验)
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Mar 15;95(6):709-15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.11.020.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of BMI on Recovery and Quality of Life Post-Revascularization in Peripheral Arterial Disease Patients.体重指数对周围动脉疾病患者血运重建术后恢复及生活质量的影响。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Dec 20;30:e946793. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946793.
2
Endovascular Revascularisation versus Open Surgery with Prosthetic Bypass for Femoro-Popliteal Lesions in Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease.外周动脉疾病患者股腘病变的血管内血运重建与人工血管搭桥开放手术对比研究
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 15;12(18):5978. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185978.
3
Obesity and Peripheral Artery Disease: Current Evidence and Controversies.
肥胖与外周动脉疾病:当前证据与争议。
Curr Obes Rep. 2023 Sep;12(3):264-279. doi: 10.1007/s13679-023-00510-7. Epub 2023 May 27.
4
The Effects of Body Mass Index on In-Hospital Mortality and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure: A Nationwide Analysis.体重指数对心力衰竭患者住院死亡率和预后的影响:一项全国性分析。
Cureus. 2022 Feb 28;14(2):e22691. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22691. eCollection 2022 Feb.
5
In-Hospital Management and Outcomes After ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Medicaid Beneficiaries Compared With Privately Insured Individuals.与私人保险个体相比,医疗补助受益人的ST段抬高型心肌梗死院内管理及预后
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jan;12(1):e004971. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004971.
6
Characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of hospitalisations with heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.射血分数降低或保留的心衰患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的住院特征和院内结局。
Ir J Med Sci. 2019 Aug;188(3):791-799. doi: 10.1007/s11845-018-1910-2. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
7
Incidence and in-hospital outcomes of single-vessel coronary chronic total occlusion treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗单支血管慢性完全闭塞性冠状动脉病变的发生率和院内转归。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 Oct 15;269:61-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.07.075. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
8
In-hospital outcomes comparison of transfemoral vs transapical transcatheter aortic valve replacement in propensity-matched cohorts with severe aortic stenosis.倾向评分匹配队列中,经股动脉与经心尖经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄的院内结局比较
Clin Cardiol. 2018 Mar;41(3):326-332. doi: 10.1002/clc.22866. Epub 2018 Mar 24.