Leite Jorge, Gonçalves Óscar F, Pereira Patrícia, Khadka Niranjan, Bikson Marom, Fregni Felipe, Carvalho Sandra
Neuropsychophysiology Laboratory, CIPsi, School of Psychology (EPsi), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Univ Portucalense, Portucalense Institute for Human Development - INPP, Oporto, Portugal; Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Neuropsychophysiology Laboratory, CIPsi, School of Psychology (EPsi), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal; Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Neurosci Res. 2018 May;130:39-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2017.08.005. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
This study examined the effects of bihemispheric and unihemispheric transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) over the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) on proactive control. Sixteen participants were randomized to receive (i) bihemispheric tDCS, with a 35cm anodal electrode of the right IFG and a 35cm cathode electrode of left IFG or (ii) unihemispheric tDCS, with a 35cm anodal electrode of the right IFG and a 100cm electrode of the left IFG or (iii) sham tDCS, while performing a prepotent inhibition task. There were significant speed-accuracy tradeoff effects in terms of switch costs: unihemispheric tDCS significantly decreased the accuracy when compared to bihemispheric, and sham tDCS, while increased response time when comparing to bihemispheric and sham tDCS. The computational model showed a symmetrical field intensity for the bihemispheric tDCS montage, and an asymmetrical for the unihemispheric tDCS montage. This study confirms that unihemispheric tDCS over the rIFG has a significant impact on response inhibition. The lack of results of bihemispheric tDCS brings two important findings for this study: (i) left IFG seems to be also critically associated with inhibitory response control, and (ii) these results highlight the importance of considering the dual effects of tDCS when choosing the electrode montage.
本研究考察了经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)双侧和单侧刺激额下回(IFG)对主动控制的影响。16名参与者被随机分配接受:(i)双侧tDCS,右侧IFG使用35cm的阳极电极,左侧IFG使用35cm的阴极电极;(ii)单侧tDCS,右侧IFG使用35cm的阳极电极,左侧IFG使用100cm的电极;或(iii)假tDCS,同时执行优势抑制任务。在转换成本方面存在显著的速度-准确性权衡效应:与双侧tDCS和假tDCS相比,单侧tDCS显著降低了准确性,而与双侧tDCS和假tDCS相比,单侧tDCS增加了反应时间。计算模型显示,双侧tDCS电极排列的场强对称,单侧tDCS电极排列的场强不对称。本研究证实,右侧IFG的单侧tDCS对反应抑制有显著影响。双侧tDCS缺乏结果为该研究带来了两个重要发现:(i)左侧IFG似乎也与抑制性反应控制密切相关;(ii)这些结果突出了在选择电极排列时考虑tDCS双重效应的重要性。