• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Patient priorities and the doorknob phenomenon in primary care: Can technology improve disclosure of patient stressors?基层医疗中的患者优先事项与门把手现象:技术能否改善患者压力源的披露?
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):214-220. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
2
Patient-Family Agenda Setting for Primary Care Patients with Cognitive Impairment: the SAME Page Trial.患者-家庭初级保健认知障碍患者的议程设置:同一页面试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Sep;33(9):1478-1486. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4563-y. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
3
Customized Care: An intervention to Improve Communication and health outcomes in multimorbidity.定制化护理:一种改善多种疾病患者沟通及健康结局的干预措施
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Dec 15;4:214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
4
Is physician self-disclosure related to patient evaluation of office visits?医生的自我表露与患者对门诊就诊的评价有关吗?
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Sep;19(9):905-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.40040.x.
5
Impact of patient requests on provider-perceived visit difficulty in primary care.患者诉求对初级医疗中医生所感知到的就诊难度的影响。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Feb;30(2):214-20. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3082-8. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
6
Health coaching via an internet portal for primary care patients with chronic conditions: a randomized controlled trial.通过互联网门户为慢性病初级保健患者提供健康指导:一项随机对照试验。
Med Care. 2009 Jan;47(1):41-7. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181844dd0.
7
A Randomized Controlled Trial of IVR-Based Alcohol Brief Intervention to Promote Patient-Provider Communication in Primary Care.一项基于交互式语音应答的酒精简短干预促进初级保健中患者与提供者沟通的随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Sep;31(9):996-1003. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3692-4. Epub 2016 May 20.
8
A tool to strengthen the older patient-companion partnership in primary care: results from a pilot study.一种增强初级保健中老年患者-同伴伙伴关系的工具:一项试点研究的结果。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Feb;62(2):312-9. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12639. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
9
Patient-Defined Visit Priorities in Primary Care: Psychosocial Versus Medically-Related Concerns.患者在初级保健中的就诊优先事项:心理社会问题与医学相关问题。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 Jul-Aug;32(4):513-520. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.04.180380.
10
Mechanisms behind the failure of residents' longitudinal primary care to promote disclosure and discussion of psychosocial issues.住院医师纵向初级保健未能促进心理社会问题的披露和讨论背后的机制。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Jul;156(7):685-92. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.156.7.685.

引用本文的文献

1
Embedding a Choice Experiment in an Online Decision Aid or Tool: Scoping Review.将选择实验嵌入在线决策辅助工具或手段:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 21;27:e59209. doi: 10.2196/59209.
2
Perceived Connections Between Personal Values and Health in High-Risk Patients with Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.患有多种疾病的高危患者对个人价值观与健康之间关联的认知:一项定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Mar 4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09448-z.
3
Structured communication methods for mental health consultations in primary care: a scoping review.基层医疗中心精神健康咨询的结构化沟通方法:综述
BMC Prim Care. 2023 Sep 4;24(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02129-y.
4
Dealing with requests for euthanasia in incompetent patients with dementia. Qualitative research revealing underexposed aspects of the societal debate.处理痴呆无行为能力患者的安乐死请求。揭示社会辩论中未被充分揭示的方面的定性研究。
Age Ageing. 2023 Jan 8;52(1). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac310.
5
Digital Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety Among People With Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review.数字健康干预在慢性病患者抑郁和焦虑中的应用:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 26;24(9):e38030. doi: 10.2196/38030.
6
Tool to improve patient-provider interactions in adult primary care: Randomized controlled pilot study.改善成人初级保健中医患互动的工具:随机对照试点研究。
Can Fam Physician. 2022 Feb;68(2):e49-e58. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6802e49.
7
URMC Universal Depression Screening Initiative: Patient Reported Outcome Assessments to Promote a Person-Centered Biopsychosocial Population Health Management Strategy.罗切斯特大学医学中心通用抑郁症筛查倡议:患者报告结局评估,以促进以人为本的生物心理社会人群健康管理策略。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 11;12:796499. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.796499. eCollection 2021.
8
I am ready to see you now, Doctor! A mixed-method study of the Let's Discuss Health website implementation in Primary Care.我现在可以见你了,医生!在初级保健中实施 Let's Discuss Health 网站的混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Apr;24(2):243-256. doi: 10.1111/hex.13158. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
9
The Impact of Previsit Contextual Data Collection on Patient-Provider Communication and Patient Activation: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.就诊前情境数据收集对医患沟通及患者激活的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 23;9(9):e20309. doi: 10.2196/20309.
10
How Do Treatment Priorities Differ Between Patients in HIV Care and Their Providers? A Mixed-Methods Study.HIV 护理中的患者及其提供者的治疗优先事项有何不同?一项混合方法研究。
AIDS Behav. 2020 Apr;24(4):1170-1180. doi: 10.1007/s10461-019-02746-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Increasing the Capacity of Primary Care Through Enabling Technology.通过赋能技术提高初级保健能力。
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Apr;32(4):398-403. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3952-3. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
2
Customized Care: An intervention to Improve Communication and health outcomes in multimorbidity.定制化护理:一种改善多种疾病患者沟通及健康结局的干预措施
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2016 Dec 15;4:214-221. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
3
Patient-centered Treatment Decisions for Urethral Stricture: Conjoint Analysis Improves Surgical Decision-making.以患者为中心的尿道狭窄治疗决策:联合分析改善手术决策制定。
Urology. 2017 Jan;99:246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.053. Epub 2016 Sep 16.
4
Moving From Disease-Centered to Patient Goals-Directed Care for Patients With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Patient Value-Based Care.从以疾病为中心转向以患者目标为导向的多慢性病患者护理:基于患者价值的护理。
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 Apr 1;1(1):9-10. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2015.0248.
5
'That's the doctor's job': Overcoming patient reluctance to be involved in medical decision making.“那是医生的工作”:克服患者参与医疗决策的抵触情绪。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jan;100(1):14-17. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
6
When patients have more than one concern.当患者有不止一个担忧时。
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):671. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.016.
7
Design Features of Explicit Values Clarification Methods: A Systematic Review.明确价值观澄清方法的设计特点:一项系统综述。
Med Decis Making. 2016 May;36(4):453-71. doi: 10.1177/0272989X15626397. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
8
Agenda-setting revisited: When and how do primary-care physicians solicit patients' additional concerns?重新审视议程设置:基层医疗医生何时以及如何征求患者的其他担忧?
Patient Educ Couns. 2016 May;99(5):718-23. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.12.009. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
9
Contextual Errors in Medical Decision Making: Overlooked and Understudied.医学决策中的情境性错误:被忽视且研究不足。
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):657-62. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001017.
10
Treatment preference and patient centered prostate cancer care: Design and rationale.治疗偏好与以患者为中心的前列腺癌护理:设计与原理
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Nov;45(Pt B):296-301. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Oct 3.

基层医疗中的患者优先事项与门把手现象:技术能否改善患者压力源的披露?

Patient priorities and the doorknob phenomenon in primary care: Can technology improve disclosure of patient stressors?

作者信息

Wittink Marsha N, Walsh Patrick, Yilmaz Sule, Mendoza Michael, Street Richard L, Chapman Benjamin P, Duberstein Paul

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA; Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, USA.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Feb;101(2):214-220. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2017.08.004
PMID:28844522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5803466/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients with multiple chronic conditions face many stressors (e.g. financial, safety, transportation stressors) that are rarely prioritized for discussion with the primary care provider (PCP). In this pilot randomized controlled trial we examined the effects of a novel technology-based intervention called Customized Care on stressor disclosure.

METHODS

The main outcomes were stressor disclosure, patient confidence and activation, as assessed by self-report and observational methods (transcribed and coded audio-recordings of the office visit).

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled. Compared with care as usual, intervention patients were 6 times more likely to disclose stressors to the PCP (OR=6.16, 95% CI [1.53, 24.81], p=0.011) and reported greater stressor disclosure confidence (exp[B]=1.06, 95% CI [1.01, 1.12], p=0.028). No differences were found in patient activation or the length of the office visit.

CONCLUSION

Customized Care improved the likelihood of stressor disclosure without affecting the length of the PCP visit.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Brief technology-based interventions, like Customized Care could be made available through patient portals, or on smart phones, to prime patient-PCP discussion about difficult subjects, thereby improving the patient experience and efficiency of the visit.

摘要

目的

患有多种慢性病的患者面临许多压力源(如经济、安全、交通压力源),而这些压力源很少被列为与初级保健提供者(PCP)讨论的优先事项。在这项试点随机对照试验中,我们研究了一种名为“定制护理”的新型基于技术的干预措施对压力源披露的影响。

方法

主要结局是压力源披露、患者信心和积极性,通过自我报告和观察方法(办公室就诊的转录和编码音频记录)进行评估。

结果

招募了60名患者。与常规护理相比,干预组患者向PCP披露压力源的可能性高出6倍(OR=6.16,95%CI[1.53,24.81],p=0.011),并报告了更高的压力源披露信心(exp[B]=1.06,95%CI[1.01,1.12],p=0.028)。在患者积极性或办公室就诊时长方面未发现差异。

结论

定制护理提高了压力源披露的可能性,而不影响PCP就诊的时长。

实践意义

像定制护理这样基于技术的简短干预措施可以通过患者门户网站或智能手机提供,以促进患者与PCP就困难话题进行讨论,从而改善患者体验和就诊效率。