Suppr超能文献

基层医疗中心精神健康咨询的结构化沟通方法:综述

Structured communication methods for mental health consultations in primary care: a scoping review.

机构信息

Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMC Prim Care. 2023 Sep 4;24(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02129-y.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Majority of people with mental health problems attend primary care for support. Interventions that structure consultations have been found effective for physical health conditions and secondary mental health care. The aim of the review is to identify what tools or interventions exist to structure communication in primary care for appointments related to mental health problems and examine existing evidence for effectiveness for mental health and quality of life outcomes.

METHODS

Quantitative and qualitative studies were eligible for inclusion if staff was based in a primary care setting and the intervention involved bi-directional communication with adult patients. Six databases were searched (MEDLINE, Web of Knowledge, EMBASE, PsycINFO, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL) with no time restriction. Search terms combined four concepts with key words such as "structured" and "interaction" and "mental illness" and "primary care". Reference lists of eligible studies were searched.

RESULTS

After removing duplicates, 3578 records were found and underwent further screening. A total of 16 records were included, representing eight different interventions from five countries. The majority were delivered by primary care doctors and focused on patients experiencing psychological distress. Similarities across interventions' service delivery were that most were created for a broad patient population, used self-report assessments at the start and actions or plans as the end point, and employed group settings and didactic methods for training staff in the intervention. Booster and follow-up trainings were not offered in any of the interventions, and supervision was only part of the process for one. The evidence for effectiveness for mental health and quality of life outcomes was mixed with three out of five RCTs finding a positive effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the idea of structuring communication for mental health consultations has been around since the 1980s, relatively few interventions have attempted to structure the conversations within the consultation, rather than modifying pre-visit events. As the evidence-base showed feasibility and acceptability for a number of interventions, there is scope for those interventions to be developed further and tested more rigorously.

摘要

背景

大多数心理健康问题患者都会到基层医疗保健机构寻求支持。人们发现,针对身体健康问题和二级精神卫生保健问题的咨询结构干预措施非常有效。本研究旨在确定存在哪些工具或干预措施可以在基层医疗保健机构中针对与心理健康问题相关的预约进行沟通,同时检查现有的针对精神健康和生活质量结果的有效性证据。

方法

如果工作人员在基层医疗保健环境中工作,且干预措施涉及与成年患者的双向沟通,则将纳入定性和定量研究。无时间限制地检索了六个数据库(MEDLINE、Web of Knowledge、EMBASE、PsycINFO、The Cochrane Library、CINAHL)。检索词结合了四个概念,关键词包括“结构化”和“互动”以及“精神疾病”和“初级保健”。还对合格研究的参考文献列表进行了搜索。

结果

在去除重复项后,共发现 3578 条记录,并进行了进一步筛选。最终纳入了 16 项记录,代表来自五个国家的八种不同干预措施。这些干预措施大多数是由基层医疗保健医生提供的,主要针对经历心理困扰的患者。干预措施在服务提供方面具有相似性,即大多数是为广泛的患者群体创建的,在开始时使用自我报告评估,在结束时使用行动或计划,并且采用小组设置和教学方法对员工进行干预培训。没有任何一项干预措施提供强化和后续培训,只有一项干预措施提供了部分监督。针对精神健康和生活质量结果的有效性证据喜忧参半,五项随机对照试验中有三项发现了积极的效果。

结论

尽管自 20 世纪 80 年代以来,就已经有了为心理健康咨询进行沟通结构的想法,但相对较少的干预措施试图在咨询过程中构建对话,而不是修改就诊前的事件。由于证据基础表明了许多干预措施具有可行性和可接受性,因此有机会进一步开发这些干预措施,并进行更严格的测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2142/10476363/99d5a16bbfe2/12875_2023_2129_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验