Holt Jeana M, Cusatis Rachel, Winn Aaron, Asan Onur, Spanbauer Charles, Williams Joni S, Flynn Kathryn E, Somai Melek, Laud Purushottam, Crotty Bradley H
College of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
Department of Family & Community Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Sep 23;9(9):e20309. doi: 10.2196/20309.
Patient-centered care is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values. To provide patient-centered care, clinicians need to know and incorporate patients' context into their communication and care with patients. Patient contextual data (PCD) encompass social determinants of health and patients' needs, values, goals, and preferences relevant to their care. PCD can be challenging to collect as a routine component of the time-limited primary care visit.
This study aims to determine if patient-provider communication and patient activation are different for patient users and patient nonusers of an electronic health record (EHR)-integrated PCD tool and assess if the impact of using PCD on patient-provider communication and patient activation differs for Black and White patients.
We describe a randomized controlled trial of a prospective cohort of non-Hispanic White and Black patients who receive primary care services at a midwestern academic health care system in the United States. We will evaluate whether providing PCD through a consumer informatics tool enhances patient-provider communication, as measured by the Communication Assessment Tool, and we will evaluate patient activation, as measured by the Patient Activation Measure for PCD tool users and nonusers. Furthermore, owing to racial disparities in care and communication, we seek to determine if the adoption and use of the tool might narrow the differences between patient groups.
The trial was funded in November 2017 and received local ethics review approval in February 2019. The study began recruitment in April 2019 and enrollment concluded in October 2019 with 301 participants. The analysis was completed in May 2020, and trial results are expected to be published in winter 2020.
Recently, there has been increased attention to the role of health information technology tools to enable patients to collaborate with providers through the sharing of PCD. The adoption of such tools may overcome the barriers of current EHRs by directly engaging patients to submit their contextual data. Effectively, these tools would support the EHR in providing a more holistic understanding of the patient. Research further supports that individuals who have robust digital engagement using consumer informatics tools have higher participation in treatment follow-up and self-care across populations. Therefore, it is critical to investigate interventions that elicit and share patients' social risks and care preferences with the health care team as a mechanism to improve individualized care and reduce the gap in health outcomes.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03766841; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03766841.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/20309.
以患者为中心的医疗服务尊重并响应患者的个人偏好、需求和价值观。为提供以患者为中心的医疗服务,临床医生需要了解患者的背景信息,并将其纳入与患者的沟通和护理中。患者背景数据(PCD)包括健康的社会决定因素以及与患者护理相关的需求、价值观、目标和偏好。作为时间有限的初级保健就诊的常规组成部分,收集PCD可能具有挑战性。
本研究旨在确定电子健康记录(EHR)集成PCD工具的患者使用者和非使用者在医患沟通和患者激活方面是否存在差异,并评估使用PCD对医患沟通和患者激活的影响在黑人和白人患者中是否不同。
我们描述了一项针对在美国中西部学术医疗系统接受初级保健服务的非西班牙裔白人和黑人患者的前瞻性队列的随机对照试验。我们将评估通过消费者信息学工具提供PCD是否能增强医患沟通(通过沟通评估工具衡量),并评估患者激活情况(通过PCD工具使用者和非使用者的患者激活量表衡量)。此外,由于医疗和沟通方面的种族差异,我们试图确定该工具的采用和使用是否可能缩小患者群体之间的差异。
该试验于2017年11月获得资助,并于2019年2月获得当地伦理审查批准。该研究于2019年4月开始招募,2019年10月结束招募,共有301名参与者。分析于2020年5月完成,试验结果预计于2020年冬季发表。
最近,人们越来越关注健康信息技术工具在使患者通过共享PCD与提供者协作方面的作用。采用此类工具可能通过直接让患者提交其背景数据来克服当前电子健康记录的障碍。有效地,这些工具将支持电子健康记录更全面地了解患者。研究进一步支持,使用消费者信息学工具进行大量数字参与的个体在不同人群中对治疗随访和自我护理的参与度更高。因此至关重要的是,研究能够引出并与医疗团队分享患者的社会风险和护理偏好的干预措施,以此作为改善个性化护理和缩小健康结果差距的一种机制。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03766841;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03766841。
国际注册报告标识符(IRRID):RR1-10.2196/20309。