OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of intrinsic water permeation on the microtensile bond strengths of different adhesive systems to dentine and the quality of resin-dentine interfaces.

METHODS

Ninety-six non-carious human third molars were divided into 4 groups: Clearfil S Bond Plus (CSBP; Kuraray); Clearfil S Bond (C3S; Kuraray); iBond Self-Etch (IB; Heraeus-Kulzer) and Prime&Bond NT (PB, control etch-and-rinse adhesive, Dentply-Sirona). For each adhesive, specimens from one subgroup (N=10) were bonded using zero pulpal pressure, while specimens from the other subgroup (N=10) were bonded using 15cm water pressure (PP). Each bonded tooth was sectioned into 1×1mm sticks and stressed to failure. Data were analysed using two-way ANOVA and Holm-Sidak pairwise comparisons to examine the effects of "adhesive", "pulpal pressure" and their interaction on bond strength (α=0.05). Representative fractured sticks were examined by SEM. The remaining tooth slabs in each subgroup were used for TEM and CLSM.

RESULTS

Microtensile bond strengths (mean±SD; in MPa) were: 33.4±6.9 (CSBP), 33.2±4.7 (CSBP-PP), 35.0±8.6 (C3S), 25.5±7.3 (C3S-PP), 18.4±4.0 (IB), 16.5±6.9 (IB-PP), 28.2±5.5 (PB), 20.5±7.2 (PB-PP). "Adhesive-type" (P<0.001), "pulpal-pressure" (P<0.001) and their interactions (P<0.001) significantly affected bond strength results. No difference between no-PP and PP subgroups was found for CSBP and IB (P>0.05). Water droplets were identified along the resin-dentine interface for IB, IB-PP and C3S-PP.

CONCLUSION

IB exhibits water sensitivity when bonding is performed with/without pulpal pressure. C3S exhibits water sensitivity when bonding is performed with pulpal pressure. CSBP does not exhibit water sensitivity when bonding is performed with/without pulpal pressure.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

Intrinsic water permeation during bonding procedures significantly affects bond strength results and the resin-dentine interface of contemporary single-bottle self-etch dentine adhesive systems.