Tufan Ali Kutlay, Onur İsmail Umut, Yiğit Fadime Ulviye, Ağaçhan Ahmet, Aşık Nacaroğlu Şenay
Health Sciences University, Bakırköy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Ophthalmology Clinic, İstanbul, Turkey.
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;47(4):198-204. doi: 10.4274/tjo.87300. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
To evaluate the potential of selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) in two arms (360˚ vs. 180˚) as a replacement for fixed combinations (FCs) with timolol in primary open angle glaucoma over 6 months.
Of 40 patients in a prospective, comparative, interventional case series, 18 eyes and 22 eyes were randomized to SLT 180º and SLT 360º groups, respectively, along with 40 fellow-control eyes. FC with timolol was discontinued on the day of treatment for the eye to be operated on, while ongoing therapy was not interrupted for the contralateral eye. Eyes were examined for intraocular pressure (IOP) elevation 1 hour and 1 day after SLT. The follow-up visits were then scheduled for 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after, during the which the IOP of both eyes and any possible complications were evaluated.
There were no statistically significant differences in mean IOPs through 6 months among the groups with exception of postlaser 1 hour and postlaser 1 day (p<0.001 and p=0.010, respectively). Multiple comparison analysis showed significantly higher IOP in both SLT 180º and SLT 360º subgroups compared to their controls at postlaser 1 hour (p=0.007, p<0.001) but significantly lower IOP only in SLT 360º subgroup compared to the controls at postlaser day 1 (p=0.013).
SLT offers promising potential as a substitute equivalent to efficacy of FCs with timolol. However, SLT 360˚ may not achieve additional IOP reduction.
评估在原发性开角型青光眼患者中,为期6个月的选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)两个治疗范围(360˚与180˚)作为噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂(FCs)替代疗法的潜力。
在一项前瞻性、对比性、介入性病例系列研究的40例患者中,18只眼和22只眼分别随机分配至SLT 180º组和SLT 360º组,另有40只对侧对照眼。对拟手术眼,在治疗当天停用噻吗洛尔FCs,而对侧眼的现行治疗不中断。在SLT术后1小时和1天检查眼压升高情况。随后安排在术后1周、1个月、3个月和6个月进行随访,评估双眼眼压及任何可能的并发症。
除激光术后1小时和1天外(分别为p<0.001和p=0.010),各治疗组在6个月内的平均眼压无统计学显著差异。多重比较分析显示,在激光术后1小时,SLT 180º和SLT 360º两个亚组的眼压均显著高于各自的对照组(p=0.007,p<0.001),但仅在激光术后第1天,SLT 360º亚组的眼压显著低于对照组(p=0.013)。
SLT作为等同于噻吗洛尔FCs疗效的替代疗法具有可观潜力。然而,360˚的SLT可能无法进一步降低眼压。