Qureshi Zaina P, Haider M Rifat, Rodriguez-Monguio Rosa, Wooten Nikki R, Nikitin Ruslan V, Ball Sarah, Barth Kelly, Elk Ronit, Horner Ronnie, Bennett Charles
Dept. of Health Services Policy and Management, University of South Carolina, Columbia, USA.
Clinical Pharmacy and Outcomes Sciences, South Carolina College of Pharmacy, Columbia, USA.
Cancer Ther Oncol Int J. 2017;3(3). doi: 10.19080/CTOIJ.2017.03.555611. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
Opioids are widely prescribed for their analgesic properties. Chronic opioid use is a persistent problem in the US. Nevertheless, little is known about its prescribing and utilization patterns and overall expenditures.
This study examined secular trends in opioid prescription drug utilization and expenditures, along with factors associated with opioid prescription drug use in US physician offices.
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) data (2006-2010), both nationally representative surveys, were used to assess the trend, predictors of opioid prescription among US adults (more than 18 years) and the opioid-associated expenditures as a whole and borne by the patients in outpatient settings.
Opioid prescription drugs use among US adults in outpatient settings, as a percentage of all prescription drugs, showed a gradual increase since 2006, leveling off in 2010. Opioid prescription drug expenditures showed an upward trend from 2009 after declining over three years. Mean out-of-pocket payments per prescription steadily declined over study period.
Cross-sectional nature and visit based information of NAMCS do not provide the actual prevalence and the reason for opioid prescription.
Given the upward trend in opioid prescription drug utilization and associated expenditures, clinicians may benefit from evidence-based methods of monitoring prescription opioid use to prevent misuse, abuse, and other adverse patient outcomes.
Drs. Qureshi, Haider, Ball, Horner and Bennett's efforts are partially supported by the University of South Carolina's ASPIRE I. Dr. Wooten's effort is funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA037412).
阿片类药物因其镇痛特性而被广泛处方。在美国,长期使用阿片类药物是一个持续存在的问题。然而,对于其处方和使用模式以及总体支出情况,人们了解甚少。
本研究调查了阿片类处方药使用和支出的长期趋势,以及美国医生办公室中与阿片类处方药使用相关的因素。
使用具有全国代表性的全国门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)和医疗支出面板调查(MEPS)数据(2006 - 2010年),来评估美国成年人(18岁以上)阿片类药物处方的趋势、预测因素,以及门诊环境中患者承担的与阿片类药物相关的总体支出。
自2006年以来,美国成年人在门诊环境中使用阿片类处方药占所有处方药的比例呈逐渐上升趋势,在2010年趋于平稳。阿片类处方药支出在经历三年下降后,从2009年开始呈上升趋势。在研究期间,每张处方的平均自付费用稳步下降。
NAMCS的横断面性质和基于就诊的信息无法提供阿片类药物处方的实际患病率及原因。
鉴于阿片类处方药使用和相关支出呈上升趋势,临床医生可能会从基于证据的方法中受益,以监测处方阿片类药物的使用,预防滥用、误用及其他不良患者结局。
库雷希博士、海德尔博士、鲍尔博士、霍纳博士和贝内特博士的工作部分得到南卡罗来纳大学ASPIRE I的支持。伍滕博士的工作由美国国家药物滥用研究所资助(K01DA037412)。