Jacobs Victoria, May Heidi T, Bair Tami L, Crandall Brian G, Cutler DO Michael J, Day John D, Mallender Charles, Osborn Jeffrey S, Weiss J Peter, Bunch T Jared
Intermountain Medical Center Heart Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, Murray, UT, USA.
Stanford University, Department of Internal Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017 Nov;28(11):1241-1246. doi: 10.1111/jce.13327. Epub 2017 Sep 26.
Stroke risk is a significant concern in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Low stroke risk patients (CHADS VASc 0-2) are often treated long-term with aspirin after catheter ablation. Defining the long-term risks versus benefits of aspirin therapy, after an ablation, is essential to validate this common clinical approach.
A total of 4,124 AF ablation patients undergoing their index ablation were included in this retrospective observational study. We compared 1- and 3-year outcomes for cerebrovascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, genitourinary (GU) bleeding, any bleeding, and AF recurrence among patients receiving: none, aspirin, or warfarin as long-term therapies.
Patient distribution by CHADS VASc scores was as follows: 0: 1,143 (28%), 1: 1,588 (39%), and 2: 1,393 (34%). Significantly higher incidents of: female gender, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, heart failure, and vascular disease were seen with higher CHADS VASc scores (P < 0.0001 for all). At 3 years, 238 (5.9%) patients were on warfarin, 743 (18.6) on aspirin, and 3,013 (75.5%) on no therapy; with occurrences of CVA/TIA (1.4%, 3.0%, 3.9%, P < 0.0001, respectively), GI bleeding (0.8%, 1.9%, 1.1%, P = 0.06, respectively), and GU bleeding (1.7%, 2.8%, 2.1%, P = 0.008, respectively) that increased with advancing CHA DS VASc score. There was a significantly increased risk for both CVA/TIA with aspirin therapy, when compared to no therapy or warfarin therapy in general, and across all CHA DS VASc scores.
After catheter ablation, low risk patients do not benefit from long-term aspirin therapy, but are at risk for higher rates of bleeding when compared to no therapy or warfarin.
中风风险是心房颤动(AF)患者的一个重大关注点。低中风风险患者(CHADS VASc评分为0 - 2)在导管消融术后常长期服用阿司匹林进行治疗。明确消融术后阿司匹林治疗的长期风险与益处,对于验证这种常见的临床治疗方法至关重要。
本回顾性观察研究纳入了4124例接受首次消融的AF消融患者。我们比较了接受无治疗、阿司匹林或华法林作为长期治疗的患者在1年和3年时发生脑血管意外(CVA)、短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)、胃肠道(GI)出血、泌尿生殖系统(GU)出血、任何出血以及AF复发的情况。
按CHADS VASc评分的患者分布如下:0分:1143例(28%),1分:1588例(39%),2分:1393例(34%)。CHADS VASc评分越高,女性、高血压、糖尿病、心力衰竭和血管疾病的发生率显著越高(所有P < 0.0001)。3年时,238例(5.9%)患者服用华法林,743例(18.6%)服用阿司匹林,3013例(75.5%)未接受治疗;CVA/TIA的发生率(分别为1.4%、3.0%、3.9%,P < 0.0001)、GI出血(分别为0.8%、1.9%、1.1%,P = 0.06)和GU出血(分别为1.7%、2.8%、2.1%,P = 0.008)均随CHADS VASc评分升高而增加。与未治疗或华法林治疗相比,总体上以及在所有CHADS VASc评分中,阿司匹林治疗的CVA/TIA风险均显著增加。
导管消融术后,低风险患者无法从长期阿司匹林治疗中获益,但与未治疗或华法林治疗相比,出血发生率更高。