• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择作为分析思维的引擎。

Choice as an engine of analytic thought.

机构信息

Division of Strategy, Management, and Organisation, Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University.

Department of Management and Organizations, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Sep;146(9):1234-1246. doi: 10.1037/xge0000351.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000351
PMID:28846005
Abstract

Choice is a behavioral act that has a variety of well-documented motivational consequences-it fosters independence by allowing people to simultaneously express themselves and influence the environment. Given the link between independence and analytic thinking, the current research tested whether choice also leads people to think in a more analytic rather than holistic manner. Four experiments demonstrate that making choices, recalling choices, and viewing others make choices leads people to think more analytically, as indicated by their attitudes, perceptual judgments, categorization, and patterns of attention allocation. People who made choices scored higher on a subjective self-report measure of analytic cognition compared to whose did not make a choice (pilot study). Using an objective task-based measure, people who recalled choices rather than actions were less influenced by changes in the background when making judgments about focal objects (Experiment 1). People who thought of others' behaviors as choices rather than actions were more likely to group objects based on categories rather than relationships (Experiment 2). People who recalled choices rather than actions subsequently allocated more visual attention to focal objects in a scene (Experiment 3). Together, these experiments demonstrate that choice has important yet previously unexamined consequences for basic psychological processes such as attention and cognition. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

选择是一种具有多种有充分记录的动机后果的行为动作——它通过允许人们同时表达自己并影响环境来促进独立性。鉴于独立性和分析思维之间的联系,当前的研究测试了选择是否也会导致人们以更分析而不是整体的方式思考。四项实验表明,做出选择、回忆选择和观察他人做出选择会促使人们更具分析性思维,这表现在他们的态度、感知判断、分类和注意力分配模式上。与没有做出选择的人相比,做出选择的人在主观的分析认知自我报告测量中得分更高(初步研究)。使用基于客观任务的测量方法,与回忆动作相比,当人们对焦点对象进行判断时,回忆选择的人受背景变化的影响较小(实验 1)。将他人的行为视为选择而不是动作的人更有可能根据类别而不是关系对物体进行分组(实验 2)。与回忆动作相比,回忆选择的人随后会在场景中更多地将视觉注意力分配给焦点对象(实验 3)。总的来说,这些实验表明,选择对注意力和认知等基本心理过程具有重要但以前未被检查的后果。

相似文献

1
Choice as an engine of analytic thought.选择作为分析思维的引擎。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Sep;146(9):1234-1246. doi: 10.1037/xge0000351.
2
The salience of choice fuels independence: Implications for self-perception, cognition, and behavior.选择的凸显性激发了独立性:对自我认知、认知和行为的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 27;118(30). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021727118.
3
Assessment of unconscious decision aids applied to complex patient-centered medical decisions.应用于以患者为中心的复杂医疗决策的无意识决策辅助工具评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 5;17(2):e37. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3739.
4
Subjective confidence in perceptual judgments: a test of the self-consistency model.主观信心在知觉判断中的作用:自我一致性模型的检验。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Feb;140(1):117-39. doi: 10.1037/a0022171.
5
The effect of introspection on judgment and decision making is dependent on the quality of conscious thinking.内省对判断和决策的影响取决于有意识思考的质量。
Conscious Cogn. 2016 May;42:340-351. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2016.04.008. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
6
Empathy is hard work: People choose to avoid empathy because of its cognitive costs.同理心是一项艰巨的工作:人们选择避免同理心是因为它需要付出认知成本。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Jun;148(6):962-976. doi: 10.1037/xge0000595. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
7
The secret life of fluency.流畅性的隐秘一面。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jun;12(6):237-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2008.02.014. Epub 2008 May 28.
8
Postdecisional counterfactual thinking by actors and readers.行动者和读者的决策后反事实思维。
Psychol Sci. 2007 Jun;18(6):510-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01931.x.
9
Causal evidence in risk and policy perceptions: Applying the covariation/mechanism framework.风险与政策认知中的因果证据:应用共变/机制框架
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 May;186:90-103. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
10
When I think about me and simulate you: medial rostral prefrontal cortex and self-referential processes.当我思考我自己并模拟你时:内侧额眶前皮质和自我参照过程。
Neuroimage. 2010 Apr 15;50(3):1340-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.091. Epub 2010 Jan 4.

引用本文的文献

1
The salience of choice reduces social responsibility: evidence from lab experiments and compliance with COVID-19 stay-at-home orders.选择的突出性降低了社会责任:来自实验室实验和对新冠疫情居家令遵守情况的证据。
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Sep 22;1(4):pgac200. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac200. eCollection 2022 Sep.
2
Development and Validation of the Holistic Cognition Scale.整体认知量表的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:551623. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.551623. eCollection 2021.
3
Individual differences in thinking style and dealing with contradiction: The mediating role of mixed emotions.
思维风格和处理矛盾的个体差异:混合情绪的中介作用。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 24;16(9):e0257864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257864. eCollection 2021.
4
The salience of choice fuels independence: Implications for self-perception, cognition, and behavior.选择的凸显性激发了独立性:对自我认知、认知和行为的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jul 27;118(30). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2021727118.