• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围手术期腰大肌与腰椎指数不能成功预测下肢血管重建术后无截肢生存率。

Perioperative psoas to lumbar vertebral index does not successfully predict amputation-free survival after lower extremity revascularization.

作者信息

Nyers Emily S, Brothers Thomas E

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC.

Surgical Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1820-1825. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.095. Epub 2017 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.095
PMID:28847658
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accurate and convenient methods for assessing a patient's risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality comprise important tools in clinical decision-making. Whereas some aspects of the patient's fitness for surgery can be easily quantified, measurement of the patient's frailty is often difficult or time-consuming. Previous research in the context of multiple types of major surgical procedures has reported psoas-L4 vertebral index (PLVI) to be a useful predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study assessed the hypothesis that PLVI can predict amputation-free survival (AFS) in patients undergoing open or endovascular lower extremity revascularization. The records of all lower extremity revascularization patients with preoperative computed tomography arteriography before revascularization during a recent 6-year period were reviewed for demographic information and outcomes. With use of embedded computed tomography software, the cross-sectional area of the bilateral psoas muscles and vertebral body at the L4 level were measured and used to calculate the PLVI. Univariate, multivariate logistic regression, and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed for the primary outcome of AFS.

RESULTS

During a 6-year period, 188 patents had preoperative scanning, qualifying for inclusion in the study; 52% received open surgical bypass and 48% received a percutaneous endovascular procedure, with a median duration of follow-up of 12 months (interquartile range [IQR], 3-24 months). Median bilateral psoas cross-sectional area was 24.9 cm (IQR, 20.5-29.7 cm), and mean PLVI was 1.74 (IQR, 1.39-2.05). Cox proportional hazards analysis identified age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.14; P = .026), congestive heart failure (HR, 4.7; 95% CI, 1.29-16.9; P = .019), and dyslipidemia (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.99; P = .049) as independent predictors of AFS loss, whereas PLVI was not (HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 0.83-8.39; P = .099). Kaplan-Meier life-table analysis demonstrated no significant differences in survival between the highest and lowest PLVI cohorts of patients. Hazard analysis showed concomitant congestive heart failure (HR, 15; 95% CI, 1.1-210; P = .042) and serum albumin concentration (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.52; P = .0026) to be independent predictors of limb loss, whereas advanced age (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.07-1.35; P = .0026), bypass procedure (HR, 4.6; 95% CI, 1.04-21; P = .045), non-African American race (HR, 9.09; 95% CI, 1.02-100; P = .048), and higher PLVI (HR, 10.9; 95% CI, 1.7-72; P = .013) predicted increased risk of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

PLVI did not predict AFS after intervention for peripheral arterial occlusive disease. This is contrary to the ability of PLVI to predict perioperative and midterm survival after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and other major abdominal surgery.

摘要

背景

准确且便捷的患者术后发病和死亡风险评估方法是临床决策的重要工具。虽然患者手术适应性的某些方面易于量化,但对患者虚弱程度的测量往往困难或耗时。先前针对多种类型大手术的研究报告称,腰大肌-L4椎体指数(PLVI)是术后发病和死亡的有用预测指标。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究评估了PLVI能否预测接受开放或血管腔内下肢血运重建术患者的无截肢生存期(AFS)这一假设。回顾了最近6年期间所有在血运重建术前进行过术前计算机断层扫描血管造影的下肢血运重建患者的记录,以获取人口统计学信息和结局。使用嵌入式计算机断层扫描软件测量双侧腰大肌和L4水平椎体的横截面积,并用于计算PLVI。对AFS的主要结局进行单因素、多因素逻辑回归和Cox比例风险分析。

结果

在6年期间,188例患者进行了术前扫描,符合纳入研究的条件;52%接受了开放手术搭桥,48%接受了经皮血管腔内手术,中位随访时间为12个月(四分位间距[IQR],3 - 24个月)。双侧腰大肌横截面积中位数为24.9 cm(IQR,20.5 - 29.7 cm),平均PLVI为1.74(IQR,1.39 - 2.05)。Cox比例风险分析确定年龄(风险比[HR],1.07;95%置信区间[CI],1.01 - 1.14;P = .026)、充血性心力衰竭(HR,4.7;95% CI,1.29 - 16.9;P = .019)和血脂异常(HR,0.34;95% CI,0.12 - 0.99;P = .049)是AFS丧失的独立预测因素,而PLVI不是(HR,2.6;95% CI,0.83 - 8.39;P = .099)。Kaplan - Meier生存表分析显示,PLVI最高和最低的患者队列之间的生存率无显著差异。风险分析显示,合并充血性心力衰竭(HR,15;95% CI,1.1 - 210;P = .042)和血清白蛋白浓度(HR,0.16;95% CI,0.05 - 0.52;P = .0026)是肢体丧失的独立预测因素,而高龄(HR,1.20;95% CI,1.07 - 1.35;P = .0026)、搭桥手术(HR,4.6;95% CI,1.04 - 21;P = .045)、非非裔美国人种族(HR,9.09;95% CI,1.02 - 100;P = .048)和较高的PLVI(HR,10.9;95% CI,1.7 - 72;P = .013)预测死亡风险增加。

结论

PLVI不能预测外周动脉闭塞性疾病干预后的AFS。这与PLVI预测腹主动脉瘤修复和其他 major腹部手术后围手术期和中期生存的能力相反。

相似文献

1
Perioperative psoas to lumbar vertebral index does not successfully predict amputation-free survival after lower extremity revascularization.围手术期腰大肌与腰椎指数不能成功预测下肢血管重建术后无截肢生存率。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1820-1825. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.095. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
2
Total psoas area predicts medium-term mortality after lower limb revascularization.总腰大肌面积预测下肢血运重建后中期死亡率。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Oct;68(4):1114-1125.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.01.040. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
3
Predictive ability of the Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system after first-time lower extremity revascularizations.血管外科学会伤口、缺血和足部感染(WIfI)分类系统对首次下肢血运重建术后的预测能力。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Mar;65(3):695-704. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.09.055. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
4
Outcomes of lower extremity revascularization among the hemodialysis-dependent.依赖血液透析患者的下肢血管重建术的治疗结果
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1183-91.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.06.203. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
5
Validation of the Global Limb Anatomic Staging System in first-time lower extremity revascularization.全球肢体解剖分期系统在首次下肢血运重建中的验证。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 May;73(5):1683-1691.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.08.151. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
6
Multidisciplinary care improves amputation-free survival in patients with chronic critical limb ischemia.多学科护理可提高慢性肢体严重缺血患者的保肢生存率。
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Jan;61(1):162-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.101. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
7
Comparison of open and endovascular treatment of patients with critical limb ischemia in the Vascular Quality Initiative.血管质量倡议中严重肢体缺血患者开放手术与血管内治疗的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Apr;63(4):958-65.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.09.063. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
8
Influence of frailty on treatment outcomes after revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia.衰弱对严重肢体缺血患者血管重建术后治疗结局的影响。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1758-1764. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.048. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
9
Predicting outcomes for infrapopliteal limb-threatening ischemia using the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.利用血管外科学会血管质量改进项目预测腘下肢体威胁性缺血的预后
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jan;63(1):114-24.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.08.063. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
10
Outcomes of open and endovascular lower extremity revascularization in active smokers with advanced peripheral arterial disease.患有晚期外周动脉疾病的活跃吸烟者进行开放性和血管腔内下肢血管重建术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1680-1689. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.025.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Clinical Implications of Frailty and Sarcopenia in Vascular Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature and Consideration of Perioperative Management.血管外科中衰弱和肌肉减少症的当前临床意义:文献综述与围手术期管理考量
Ann Vasc Dis. 2022 Sep 25;15(3):165-174. doi: 10.3400/avd.ra.22-00035.
2
Systematic review and meta-analysis of lean mass and mortality: Rationale and study description.瘦体重与死亡率的系统评价和荟萃分析:原理与研究描述
Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2021 Mar;7(Suppl 1):S3-S12. doi: 10.1016/j.afos.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
3
Sarcopenia and peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review.
肌肉减少症与外周动脉疾病:系统综述。
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020 Aug;11(4):866-886. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.12587. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
4
Sarcopenia as a Possible Negative Predictor of Limb Salvage in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.肌肉减少症可能是慢性肢体威胁性缺血患者保肢的负面预测指标。
Ann Vasc Dis. 2019 Jun 25;12(2):194-199. doi: 10.3400/avd.oa.18-00167.
5
Pre-operative psoas major measurement compared to P-POSSUM as a prognostic indicator in over-80s undergoing emergency laparotomy.术前腰大肌测量与P-POSSUM相比,作为80岁以上接受急诊剖腹手术患者的预后指标。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2020 Feb;46(1):215-220. doi: 10.1007/s00068-018-1025-5. Epub 2018 Oct 13.