Suppr超能文献

双氯芬酸治疗骨关节炎的疗效与安全性:未发表的传统研究的网状荟萃分析结果

Efficacy and safety of diclofenac in osteoarthritis: Results of a network meta-analysis of unpublished legacy studies.

作者信息

Guyot Patricia, Pandhi Shaloo, Nixon Richard M, Iqbal Asif, Chaves Ricardo L, Andrew Moore R

机构信息

Health Economics & Outcomes Research, MAPI, Lyon, France.

Global Development, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Scand J Pain. 2017 Jul;16:74-88. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Apr 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Diclofenac is widely prescribed for the treatment of pain. Several network meta-analyses (NMA), largely of published trials have evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). The present NMA extends these analyses to unpublished older (legacy) diclofenac trials.

METHODS

We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of diclofenac with planned study duration of at least 4 weeks for the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) from 'legacy' studies conducted by Novartis but not published in a peer reviewed journal or included in any previous pooled analyses. All studies reporting efficacy and/or safety of treatment with diclofenac or other active therapies or placebo were included. We used a Bayesian NMA model, and estimated relative treatment effects between pairwise treatments. Main outcomes included pain relief measured using visual analogue scale at 2, 4 and 12 weeks and patient global assessment (PGA) at 4 and 12 weeks for efficacy, all-cause withdrawals, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 19 RCTs (5030 patients) were included; 18 of which were double-blind and one single-blind. All studies were conducted before cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors (COXIBs) became commercially available. Data permitted robust efficacy comparison between diclofenac and ibuprofen, but the amount of data for other comparators was limited. Diclofenac 150mg/day was more efficacious than ibuprofen 1200mg/day and had likely favourable outcomes for pain relief compared to ibuprofen 2400mg/day. Diclofenac 100mg/day had likely favourable outcomes compared to ibuprofen 1200mg/day in alleviating pain. Based on PGA, diclofenac 150mg/day was more efficacious and likely to be favourable than ibuprofen 1200mg/day and 2400mg/day, respectively. Risk of withdrawal due to all causes with diclofenac and ibuprofen were comparable. Diclofenac 150mg/day was likely to have favourable efficacy and comparable tolerability with diclofenac 100mg/day. Results comparing diclofenac and ibuprofen were similar to those from NMAs of published trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from these unpublished 'legacy' studies were similar to those from NMAs of published trials. The favourable efficacy results of diclofenac compared to ibuprofen expand the amount of available evidence comparing these two NSAIDs. The overall benefit-risk profile of diclofenac was comparable to that of ibuprofen in OA.

IMPLICATIONS

The present NMA results reassures that the older unpublished blinded trials have similar results compared to more recently published trials and also contributes to increase the transparency of clinical trials performed with diclofenac further back in the past.

摘要

背景与目的

双氯芬酸被广泛用于疼痛治疗。多项网络荟萃分析(NMA),主要基于已发表的试验,评估了非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的疗效、耐受性和安全性。本NMA将这些分析扩展至未发表的早期(遗留)双氯芬酸试验。

方法

我们从诺华公司开展的“遗留”研究中识别出双氯芬酸治疗骨关节炎(OA)的随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验计划研究时长至少4周,且未在同行评审期刊上发表或纳入以往任何汇总分析。纳入所有报告双氯芬酸或其他活性疗法或安慰剂治疗的疗效和/或安全性的研究。我们使用贝叶斯NMA模型,估计成对治疗之间的相对治疗效果。主要结局包括在第2、4和12周使用视觉模拟量表测量的疼痛缓解情况,以及在第4和12周的患者整体评估(PGA)以评估疗效、全因撤药情况和不良事件。

结果

共纳入19项RCT(5030例患者);其中18项为双盲试验,1项为单盲试验。所有研究均在环氧化酶2抑制剂(COXIBs)上市之前进行。数据允许对双氯芬酸和布洛芬进行有力的疗效比较,但其他对照药物的数据量有限。双氯芬酸150mg/天比布洛芬1200mg/天更有效,与布洛芬2400mg/天相比,在缓解疼痛方面可能有更好的结果。双氯芬酸100mg/天与布洛芬1200mg/天相比,在缓解疼痛方面可能有更好的结果。基于PGA,双氯芬酸150mg/天分别比布洛芬1200mg/天和2400mg/天更有效且可能更具优势。双氯芬酸和布洛芬因各种原因撤药的风险相当。双氯芬酸150mg/天与双氯芬酸100mg/天相比,可能具有相似的疗效和相当的耐受性。双氯芬酸和布洛芬比较的结果与已发表试验的NMA结果相似。

结论

这些未发表的“遗留”研究结果与已发表试验的NMA结果相似。双氯芬酸与布洛芬相比的良好疗效结果扩展了比较这两种NSAIDs的现有证据量。在OA中,双氯芬酸的总体获益风险状况与布洛芬相当。

启示

本NMA结果表明,与最近发表的试验相比,早期未发表的盲法试验结果相似,也有助于进一步提高过去使用双氯芬酸进行的临床试验的透明度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验