• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities.未来的临床学术人才队伍:对英国两所研究密集型大学临床博士生职业决策影响因素的横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e016823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016823.
2
Specialty preference and intentions to study abroad of Syrian medical students during the crisis.叙利亚医学生在危机期间的专业偏好和出国留学意向。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Mar 16;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1146-x.
3
Does initial postgraduate career intention and social demographics predict perceived career behaviour? A national cross-sectional survey of UK postgraduate doctors.初始研究生职业意向和社会人口统计学是否预测职业行为感知?英国研究生医生的全国横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 5;9(8):e026444. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026444.
4
UK medical students' attitudes towards their future careers and general practice: a cross-sectional survey and qualitative analysis of an Oxford cohort.英国医学生对未来职业和全科医学的态度:牛津队列的横断面调查和定性分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1197-z.
5
Differences between first and fourth year medical students' interest in pursuing careers in academic medicine.医学院一年级和四年级学生在追求学术医学职业方面的兴趣差异。
Int J Med Educ. 2016 May 24;7:154-7. doi: 10.5116/ijme.571b.af3d.
6
The role of medical schools in UK students' career intentions: findings from the AIMS study.英国医学院校对学生职业意向的影响:AIMS 研究的发现。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 31;24(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05366-6.
7
Gender disparities among medical students choosing to pursue careers in medical research: a secondary cross-sectional cohort analysis.医学生选择医学研究职业的性别差异:二次横断面队列分析。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Nov 25;21(1):591. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03004-z.
8
Career intentions of PhD students in nursing: A cross-sectional survey.护理博士生的职业意向:一项横断面调查。
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 May;64:196-203. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.018.
9
What will it take? Pathways, time and funding: Australian medical students' perspective on clinician-scientist training.需要什么?途径、时间和资金:澳大利亚医学生对临床科学家培训的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 8;17(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1081-2.
10
EXPLORING REASONS THAT U.S. MD-PHD STUDENTS ENTER AND LEAVE THEIR DUAL-DEGREE PROGRAMS.探究美国医学博士-哲学博士学生进入和退出其双学位项目的原因。
Int J Dr Stud. 2020;15:461-483. doi: 10.28945/4622.

引用本文的文献

1
Students' and educators' perceptions of clinical academic pathways in the UK: a qualitative study.英国学生和教育工作者对临床学术路径的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 24;15(3):e089791. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089791.
2
Physician-Scientists: Fixing the Leaking Pipeline - A Scoping Review.医生科学家:修复人才流失管道——一项范围综述
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Nov 2;32(6):1413-1424. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01658-y. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Assessing publication rates from medical students' mandatory research projects in the Netherlands: a follow-up study of 10 cohorts of medical students.评估荷兰医学生必修研究项目的发表率:对10组医学生的随访研究
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 4;12(4):e056053. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056053.
4
Tips to Support the Recruitment, Retention, and Progression of Clinical Academics.支持临床学术人员招聘、留用和职业发展的小贴士。
Med Sci Educ. 2022 Feb 16;32(2):503-509. doi: 10.1007/s40670-022-01512-1. eCollection 2022 Apr.
5
Cross-sectional Survey of Medical student Attitudes to Research and Training pathways (SMART) in the UK: study protocol.英国医学生对研究和培训途径(SMART)的态度的横断面调查:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Sep 2;11(9):e050104. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050104.
6
A qualitative study exploring experiences and challenges of combining clinical academic training with family life.一项探索临床学术培训与家庭生活相结合的经验和挑战的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Aug 16;21(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02849-8.
7
Healthcare professionals in research (HPiR) Facebook community: a survey of U.K. doctoral and postdoctoral healthcare professionals outside of medicine.医疗保健专业研究人员(HPiR)Facebook 社区:对英国非医学领域的博士生和博士后医疗保健专业人员的调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2021 Apr 23;21(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02672-1.
8
Multimethods study comparing the experiences of medical clinical academics with nurses, midwives and allied health professionals pursuing a clinical academic career.一项多方法研究,比较医学临床学者与从事临床学术职业的护士、助产士及专职医疗人员的经历。
BMJ Open. 2021 Apr 1;11(4):e043270. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043270.
9
Mentoring as an intervention to promote gender equality in academic medicine: a systematic review.指导作为促进医学学术领域性别平等的一种干预措施:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):e040355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040355.
10
Factors impacting on retention, success and equitable participation in clinical academic careers: a scoping review and meta-thematic synthesis.影响临床学术职业保留、成功和公平参与的因素:范围综述和元主题综合分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 25;10(3):e033480. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033480.

本文引用的文献

1
Factors that influence career progression among postdoctoral clinical academics: a scoping review of the literature.影响博士后临床学者职业发展的因素:文献综述
BMJ Open. 2016 Oct 21;6(10):e013523. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013523.
2
Why do women choose or reject careers in academic medicine? A narrative review of empirical evidence.为什么女性选择或拒绝从事学术医学职业?实证证据的叙事性回顾。
Lancet. 2016 Dec 10;388(10062):2948-2958. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01091-0. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
3
Clinical academics' postdoctoral career development.临床学者的博士后职业发展。
BMJ. 2015 Dec 30;351:h6945. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6945.
4
Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review.临床医生和组织参与研究是否能提高医疗保健绩效:三阶段综述
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 9;5(12):e009415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415.
5
"It's the duty of every doctor to get involved with research".参与研究是每位医生的职责。
BMJ. 2015 Nov 27;351:h6329. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h6329.
6
Rescuing the physician-scientist workforce: the time for action is now.拯救医学科研工作者队伍:行动刻不容缓。
J Clin Invest. 2015 Oct 1;125(10):3742-7. doi: 10.1172/JCI84170.
7
Building a sustainable clinical academic workforce to meet the future healthcare needs of Australia and New Zealand: report from the first summit meeting.构建可持续的临床学术人才队伍以满足澳大利亚和新西兰未来的医疗保健需求:首届峰会报告
Intern Med J. 2015 Sep;45(9):965-71. doi: 10.1111/imj.12854.
8
Research activity and the association with mortality.研究活动及其与死亡率的关联。
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 26;10(2):e0118253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118253. eCollection 2015.
9
Career plans and views of trainees in the Academic Clinical Fellowship Programme in England.英格兰学术临床研究员计划学员的职业规划和看法。
Med Teach. 2011;33(11):e637-43. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.610842.
10
Stories from early-career women physicians who have left academic medicine: a qualitative study at a single institution.早期职业女性医生离开学术医学的故事:单机构的定性研究。
Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):752-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e83b.

未来的临床学术人才队伍:对英国两所研究密集型大学临床博士生职业决策影响因素的横断面研究

The clinical academic workforce of the future: a cross-sectional study of factors influencing career decision-making among clinical PhD students at two research-intensive UK universities.

作者信息

Lopes Joana, Ranieri Veronica, Lambert Trevor, Pugh Chris, Barratt Helen, Fulop Naomi J, Rees Geraint, Best Denise

机构信息

Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School, John Radcliffe Hospital (Main Hospital), Oxford, UK.

Academic Careers Office, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 28;7(8):e016823. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016823.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016823
PMID:28851792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5724086/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To examine clinical doctoral students' demographic and training characteristics, career intentions, career preparedness and what influences them as they plan their future careers.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Online cross-sectional census surveys at two research-intensive medical schools in England in 2015-2016.

PARTICIPANTS

All medically qualified PhD students (N=523) enrolled at the University of Oxford and University College London were invited to participate. We report on data from 320 participants (54% male and 44% female), who were representative by gender of the invited population.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Career intentions.

RESULTS

Respondents were mainly in specialty training, including close to training completion (25%, n=80), and 18% (n=57) had completed training. Half (50%, n=159) intended to pursue a clinical academic career (CAC) and 62% (n=198) were at least moderately likely to seek a clinical lectureship (CL). However, 51% (n=163) had little or no knowledge about CL posts. Those wanting a CAC tended to have the most predoctoral medical research experience (χ (2, N=305)=22.19, p=0.0005). Key reasons cited for not pursuing a CAC were the small number of senior academic appointments available, the difficulty of obtaining research grants and work-life balance.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings suggest that urging predoctoral clinicians to gain varied research experience while ensuring availability of opportunities, and introducing more flexible recruitment criteria for CL appointments, would foster CACs. As CL posts are often only open to those still in training, the many postdoctoral clinicians who have completed training, or nearly done so, do not currently gain the opportunity the post offers to develop as independent researchers. Better opportunities should be accompanied by enhanced career support for clinical doctoral students (eg, to increase knowledge of CLs). Finally, ways to increase the number of senior clinical academic appointments should be explored since their lack seems to significantly influence career decisions.

摘要

目的

研究临床博士生的人口统计学和培训特征、职业意向、职业准备情况以及在规划未来职业时影响他们的因素。

设计与背景

2015 - 2016年在英格兰两所研究密集型医学院进行的在线横断面普查。

参与者

邀请了牛津大学和伦敦大学学院所有具有医学资格的博士生(N = 523)参与。我们报告了320名参与者的数据(男性占54%,女性占44%),他们在性别上代表了受邀人群。

主要观察指标

职业意向。

结果

受访者主要处于专科培训阶段,包括接近培训完成阶段(25%,n = 80),18%(n = 57)已完成培训。一半(50%,n = 159)打算从事临床学术职业(CAC),62%(n = 198)至少有一定可能性寻求临床讲师职位(CL)。然而,51%(n = 163)对CL职位了解甚少或一无所知。想要从事CAC的人往往拥有最多的博士前医学研究经验(χ(2, N = 305) = 22.19,p = 0.0005)。不追求CAC的主要原因是高级学术职位数量少、获得研究资助困难以及工作与生活的平衡。

结论

研究结果表明,敦促博士前临床医生在确保有机会的同时获得多样化的研究经验,并为CL职位引入更灵活的招聘标准,将有助于培养临床学术人员。由于CL职位通常只对仍在培训的人员开放,许多已完成培训或即将完成培训的博士后临床医生目前没有获得该职位提供的作为独立研究人员发展的机会。更好的机会应伴随着为临床博士生提供增强的职业支持(例如,增加对CL职位的了解)。最后,应探索增加高级临床学术职位数量的方法,因为其数量不足似乎对职业决策有重大影响。