Suppr超能文献

从护生视角看基于教师的临床评估挑战:质性内容分析

Challenges of teacher-based clinical evaluation from nursing students' point of view: Qualitative content analysis.

作者信息

Sadeghi Tabandeh, Seyed Bagheri Seyed Hamid

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.

出版信息

J Educ Health Promot. 2017 Aug 9;6:72. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_109_16. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Clinical evaluation is very important in the educational system of nursing. One of the most common methods of clinical evaluation is evaluation by the teacher, but the challenges that students would face in this evaluation method, have not been mentioned. Thus, this study aimed to explore the experiences and views of nursing students about the challenges of teacher-based clinical evaluation.

METHODS

This study was a descriptive qualitative study with a qualitative content analysis approach. Data were gathered through semi-structured focused group sessions with undergraduate nursing students who were passing their 8 semester at Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. Date were analyzed using Graneheim and Lundman's proposed method. Data collection and analysis were concurrent.

RESULTS

According to the findings, "factitious evaluation" was the main theme of study that consisted of three categories: "Personal preferences," "unfairness" and "shirking responsibility." These categories are explained using quotes derived from the data.

CONCLUSION

According to the results of this study, teacher-based clinical evaluation would lead to factitious evaluation. Thus, changing this approach of evaluation toward modern methods of evaluation is suggested. The finding can help nursing instructors to get a better understanding of the nursing students' point of view toward this evaluation approach and as a result could be planning for changing of this approach.

摘要

引言

临床评估在护理教育体系中非常重要。临床评估最常见的方法之一是教师评估,但学生在这种评估方法中可能面临的挑战却未被提及。因此,本研究旨在探讨护理专业学生对基于教师的临床评估挑战的经历和看法。

方法

本研究是一项采用定性内容分析方法的描述性定性研究。通过与拉夫桑贾医科大学正在进行第八学期学习的本科护理专业学生进行半结构化焦点小组讨论来收集数据。使用格兰海姆和伦德曼提出的方法对数据进行分析。数据收集和分析同时进行。

结果

根据研究结果,“虚假评估”是研究的主要主题,它由三个类别组成:“个人偏好”、“不公平”和“推卸责任”。这些类别通过从数据中提取的引语进行解释。

结论

根据本研究结果,基于教师的临床评估会导致虚假评估。因此,建议将这种评估方法转变为现代评估方法。该研究结果有助于护理教师更好地理解护理专业学生对这种评估方法的观点,从而能够计划改变这种方法。

相似文献

1
Challenges of teacher-based clinical evaluation from nursing students' point of view: Qualitative content analysis.
J Educ Health Promot. 2017 Aug 9;6:72. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_109_16. eCollection 2017.
2
Coping strategies of nursing students for dealing with stress in clinical setting: A qualitative study.
Electron Physician. 2017 Dec 25;9(12):6120-6128. doi: 10.19082/6120. eCollection 2017 Dec.
3
Moving toward heutagogical learning: Illuminating undergraduate nursing students' experiences in a flipped classroom.
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.016. Epub 2016 Nov 25.
4
'It's complicated': Staff nurse perceptions of their influence on nursing students' learning. A qualitative descriptive study.
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Apr;63:76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.017. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
5
Exploring the educational challenges in emergency medical students: A qualitative study.
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2021 Apr;9(2):79-84. doi: 10.30476/jamp.2021.88535.1344.
6
Causes of Incivility in Iranian Nursing Students: A Qualitative Study.
Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2016 Jan;4(1):47-56.
7
Academic challenges and positive aspects: perceptions of male nursing students.
Int Nurs Rev. 2014 Jun;61(2):263-9. doi: 10.1111/inr.12098. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
Student--teacher connection in clinical nursing education.
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Mar;37(6):566-76. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02131.x.
10
Factors Influencing Nursing Students' Clinical Judgment: A Qualitative Directed Content Analysis in an Iranian Context.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 May;11(5):JC01-JC04. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/25753.9822. Epub 2017 May 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the social accountability challenges of nursing education system in Iran.
BMC Nurs. 2023 Jan 6;22(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01157-w.
2
Exploring experience of Iranian medical sciences educators about Best Evidence Medical Education: A content analysis.
J Educ Health Promot. 2019 Dec 31;8:247. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_428_19. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Iranian nursing students' comprehension and experiences regarding evaluation process: a thematic analysis study.
Scand J Caring Sci. 2011 Mar;25(1):151-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2010.00805.x. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
2
Evaluation of evidence-based methods used to teach nursing students to critically appraise evidence.
J Nurs Educ. 2008 Aug;47(8):372-5. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20080801-08.
3
Student evaluations: advice for novice faculty.
J Nurs Educ. 2008 Apr;47(4):187-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20080401-03.
4
Assessing undergraduate nursing students in clinical practice: do preceptors use assessment strategies?
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Apr;28(3):301-13. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
5
Determining problems experienced by student nurses in their work with clinical educators in Turkey.
Nurse Educ Today. 2007 Jul;27(5):491-8. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2006.08.011. Epub 2006 Oct 27.
6
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
7
8
Assessing practice of student nurses: methods, preparation of assessors and student views.
J Adv Nurs. 2002 Jun;38(5):516-23. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2002.02213.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验