Caspard Herve, Mallory Raburn M, Yu Jing, Ambrose Christopher S
MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 24;4(3):ofx111. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx111. eCollection 2017 Summer.
This systematic review and meta-analysis describes and consolidates findings from all studies that assessed the effectiveness of live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) against laboratory-confirmed influenza since the 2009 pandemic in children and young adults.
A MEDLINE search was conducted for articles published from January 1, 2010 to November 30, 2016. All original publications reporting an effectiveness estimate of LAIV against cases of influenza confirmed by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction or culture were retained for analysis. Effectiveness estimates were categorized by LAIV formulation (monovalent, trivalent, and quadrivalent) and strain (any influenza strain, A(H1N1)pdm09, A(H3N2), and B strains). Consolidated estimates were obtained with a random-effects model.
A total of 24 publications presenting 29 observational studies were retained for meta-analysis. Live-attenuated influenza vaccine was not shown to be effective against A(H1N1)pdm09 strains as a monovalent formulation in 2009-2010 or as a trivalent formulation from 2010-2011 to 2013-2014, but consolidated sample sizes were small. It was effective as a quadrivalent formulation but less effective than inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV). Live-attenuated influenza vaccine was consistently effective against B strains and matched A(H3N2) strains but was not shown to provide significant protection against mismatched A(H3N2) strains in 2014-2015.
These findings confirm that effectiveness of LAIV against A(H1N1)pdm09 strains has been lower than IIV. A systematic investigation has been initiated to determine the root cause of the difference in effectiveness between pre- and postpandemic A(H1N1) vaccine strains and to identify a more consistently effective A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccine strain.
本系统评价和荟萃分析描述并整合了自2009年大流行以来所有评估减毒活流感疫苗(LAIV)对儿童和青年实验室确诊流感有效性的研究结果。
对2010年1月1日至2016年11月30日发表的文章进行MEDLINE检索。保留所有报告LAIV对经逆转录聚合酶链反应或培养确诊的流感病例有效性估计值的原始出版物进行分析。有效性估计值按LAIV剂型(单价、三价和四价)和毒株(任何流感毒株、A(H1N1)pdm09、A(H3N2)和B毒株)分类。采用随机效应模型获得合并估计值。
共保留24篇发表了29项观察性研究的出版物用于荟萃分析。减毒活流感疫苗在2009 - 2010年作为单价剂型或2010 - 2011年至2013 - 2014年作为三价剂型时,对A(H1N1)pdm09毒株未显示出有效性,但合并样本量较小。作为四价剂型时有效,但比灭活流感疫苗(IIV)效果差。减毒活流感疫苗对B毒株和匹配的A(H3N2)毒株始终有效,但在2014 - 2015年对不匹配的A(H3N2)毒株未显示出显著保护作用。
这些发现证实,LAIV对A(H1N1)pdm09毒株的有效性低于IIV。已启动一项系统调查,以确定大流行前和大流行后A(H1N1)疫苗毒株有效性差异的根本原因,并确定一种更持续有效的A(H1N1)pdm09疫苗毒株。