1 Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, The Sahlgrenska Academy, Center of Ageing and Health (AgeCap), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
2 School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Dalarna University, Falun, Sweden.
J Appl Gerontol. 2019 Aug;38(8):1096-1120. doi: 10.1177/0733464817727110. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
This case study explored how a researcher-community partnership contributed to program adaptations when implementing person-centered group-based health promotion services to older people who have migrated to Sweden. The study was conducted over 3 years and various data sources were used: focus groups, individual interviews, documents, and archive material. Findings from different data sources and partners' perspectives were triangulated to an overall case description using an iterative process. Adaptations were shaped through a dynamic process, negotiating toward suitable solutions that culminated in actions taken to adapt or inhibit adaptations. The negotiations were driven by the interplay within and between three reasons to adapt. The partners' opportunities to influence the negotiation process depended on establishing common ground to shape adaptations. Practical implications are provided on how to move from knowledge to action when implementing person-centered group-based health promotion to support optimal aging in the context of migration.
本案例研究探讨了在向移居瑞典的老年人提供以患者为中心的基于小组的健康促进服务时，研究人员与社区的合作如何促成项目的调整。该研究历时 3 年，使用了多种数据源：焦点小组、个人访谈、文件和档案材料。使用迭代过程，将来自不同数据源和合作伙伴观点的结果进行三角剖分，以形成总体案例描述。调整是通过一个动态的过程形成的，通过协商达成合适的解决方案，最终采取行动进行调整或抑制调整。这些协商是由三个适应原因的相互作用驱动的。合作伙伴影响协商过程的机会取决于建立共同基础来塑造调整。提供了在实施以患者为中心的基于小组的健康促进以支持移民背景下的最佳老龄化时，如何将知识转化为行动的实际意义。
