Suppr超能文献

使用BCP白蛋白测定法校正低白蛋白血症后的血清钙与离子钙的比较及其对血液透析患者处方的影响

Comparison of hypoalbuminemia-corrected serum calcium using BCP albumin assay to ionized calcium and impact on prescribing in hemodialysis patients
.

作者信息

Pan Wenxin Cindy, Lau Wynnie, Mattman Andre, Kiaii Mercedeh, Jung Beverly

出版信息

Clin Nephrol. 2018 Jan;89 (2018)(1):34-40. doi: 10.5414/CN109070.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Albumin-corrected calcium (cCa) is recommended over ionized calcium (iCa) in hemodialysis (HD) patients per the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes position statements due to cost and feasibility. Two common albumin assays, bromocresol green (BCG) and bromocresol purple (BCP), produce differing results in uremic patients. All previous studies compared iCa to cCa from a BCG assay. This study, using the BCP assay, aimed to compare cCa and total calcium, respectively, to iCa. We also sought to assess phosphate binders and dialysis prescribing patterns following abnormal calcium measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of 122 stable chronic HD patients with iCa, serum calcium, and albumin measured together throughout 6 blood work periods for a total of 338 sets of comparison values. Payne and Jain calcium correction equations were used. Prescription changes within 2 weeks of abnormal iCa values were recorded.

RESULTS

Mean iCa, cCa, and total calcium were 1.17 ± 0.08, 2.37 ± 0.16, and 2.28 ± 0.15 mmol/L, respectively. Total calcium and cCa compared to iCa had κ-coefficients of 0.19 and 0.08, respectively, for hypocalcemia, 0.19 and -0.02 for normocalcemia and 0.59 and 0.46 for hypercalcemia. 21 interventions were made in hypocalcemic patients using iCa as reference; however, if total or corrected calcium values were used, only 8 and 5 interventions, respectively, would result.

CONCLUSION: When BCP assay is used, conventional correction equations should not be utilized in hemodialysis patients; uncorrected serum calcium has a better predictive value.
.

摘要

背景

根据改善全球肾脏病预后组织的立场声明,由于成本和可行性因素,对于血液透析(HD)患者,推荐使用白蛋白校正钙(cCa)而非离子钙(iCa)。两种常见的白蛋白检测方法,溴甲酚绿(BCG)法和溴甲酚紫(BCP)法,在尿毒症患者中会产生不同的结果。以往所有研究均将iCa与BCG法检测的cCa进行比较。本研究采用BCP法,旨在分别将cCa和总钙与iCa进行比较。我们还试图评估钙测量异常后磷结合剂和透析处方模式。

材料与方法

回顾性分析122例稳定的慢性HD患者,在6个血液检查期内同时测量iCa、血清钙和白蛋白,共获得338组比较值。使用佩恩和贾因钙校正方程。记录iCa值异常后2周内的处方变化。

结果

iCa、cCa和总钙的平均值分别为1.17±0.08、2.37±0.16和2.28±0.15 mmol/L。低钙血症时,总钙和cCa与iCa相比的κ系数分别为0.19和0.08,正常钙血症时为0.19和 -0.02,高钙血症时为0.59和0.46。以iCa为参考,对低钙血症患者进行了21次干预;然而,如果使用总钙或校正钙值,则分别仅会进行8次和5次干预。

结论

当使用BCP法时,血液透析患者不应使用传统校正方程;未校正的血清钙具有更好的预测价值。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验