外周神经阻滞术后应用神经周围 vs 全身地塞米松延长镇痛效果的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of perineural vs systemic dexamethasone to prolong analgesia after peripheral nerve block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Department of Anaesthesia, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2017 Aug 1;119(2):183-191. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex191.

Abstract

Perineural dexamethasone has gained popularity in regional anaesthesia to prolong the duration of analgesia, but its advantage over systemic administration is disputed. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the analgesic efficacy of both routes of administration during peripheral nerve block. The methodology followed the PRISMA statement guidelines. The primary outcome was the duration of analgesia analysed according to the type of local anaesthetic administered (bupivacaine or ropivacaine). Secondary outcomes included cumulative opioid consumption in morphine i.v. equivalents, pain scores, and complication rates (neurological complications, infection, or hyperglycaemia). Eleven controlled trials, including 914 patients, were identified. The duration of analgesia was significantly increased with perineural dexamethasone vs systemic dexamethasone by a mean difference of 3 h [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4, 4.5 h; P=0.0001]. Subgroup analysis revealed that the duration of analgesia was increased by 21% with bupivacaine (mean difference: 4.0 h; 95% CI: 2.8, 5.2 h; P<0.00001) and 12% with ropivacaine (mean difference: 2.0 h; 95% CI: -0.5, 4.5 h; P=0.11). The quality of evidence for our primary outcome was moderate according to the GRADE system. There were no significant differences in other secondary outcomes. No neurological complications or infections were reported. Glucose concentrations were not increased when dexamethasone was injected systemically, but this outcome was reported by only two trials. There is, therefore, moderate evidence that perineural dexamethasone combined with bupivacaine, but not ropivacaine, slightly prolongs the duration of analgesia, without an impact on other pain-related outcomes, when compared with systemic dexamethasone. Injection of perineural dexamethasone should be cautiously balanced in light of the off-label indication for this route of administration.

摘要

神经周围地塞米松在区域麻醉中已被广泛应用,以延长镇痛持续时间,但它相对于全身给药的优势存在争议。本荟萃分析的目的是比较外周神经阻滞时两种给药途径的镇痛效果。该方法遵循 PRISMA 声明指南。主要结局是根据所给予的局部麻醉剂(布比卡因或罗哌卡因)类型分析的镇痛持续时间。次要结局包括静脉注射吗啡等效物的累积阿片类药物消耗量、疼痛评分和并发症发生率(神经并发症、感染或高血糖)。确定了 11 项对照试验,共纳入 914 名患者。与全身地塞米松相比,神经周围地塞米松使镇痛持续时间显著延长,平均差异为 3 小时[95%置信区间(CI):1.4,4.5 小时;P=0.0001]。亚组分析显示,布比卡因使镇痛持续时间延长 21%(平均差异:4.0 小时;95%CI:2.8,5.2 小时;P<0.00001),罗哌卡因使镇痛持续时间延长 12%(平均差异:2.0 小时;95%CI:-0.5,4.5 小时;P=0.11)。根据 GRADE 系统,我们的主要结局的证据质量为中等。其他次要结局无显著差异。未报告神经并发症或感染。当地塞米松全身注射时,血糖浓度没有升高,但只有两项试验报告了这一结果。因此,有中等证据表明,与全身地塞米松相比,神经周围地塞米松联合布比卡因而不是罗哌卡因略微延长了镇痛持续时间,但对其他与疼痛相关的结局没有影响。鉴于这种给药途径的标签外适应证,应谨慎权衡神经周围地塞米松的注射。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索