• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Recognition and treatment of severe sepsis in the emergency department: retrospective study in two French teaching hospitals.急诊科严重脓毒症的识别与治疗:法国两家教学医院的回顾性研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12873-017-0133-6.
2
Early recognition of sepsis through emergency medical services pre-hospital screening.通过急救医疗服务院前筛查早期识别脓毒症。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1428-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.036. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
3
Antibiotic Delays and Feasibility of a 1-Hour-From-Triage Antibiotic Requirement: Analysis of an Emergency Department Sepsis Quality Improvement Database.从分诊到使用抗生素的时间延迟与 1 小时抗生素使用要求的可行性:一项急诊科脓毒症质量改进数据库的分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2020 Jan;75(1):93-99. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
4
A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department.一项旨在改善急诊科早期脓毒症护理的质量改进项目。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):787-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003552. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
5
Quality initiative to improve emergency department sepsis bundle compliance through utilisation of an electronic health record tool.通过利用电子健康记录工具提高急诊科脓毒症捆绑包依从性的质量改进措施。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Jan;11(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001624.
6
Impact of nurse-initiated ED sepsis protocol on compliance with sepsis bundles, time to initial antibiotic administration, and in-hospital mortality.护士启动的急诊科脓毒症治疗方案对脓毒症集束化治疗的依从性、首次使用抗生素的时间及住院死亡率的影响。
J Emerg Nurs. 2015 Mar;41(2):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2014.12.007. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
7
Sepsis now a priority: a quality improvement initiative for early sepsis recognition and care.脓毒症现列为优先事项:一项关于早期脓毒症识别与护理的质量改进举措。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Dec 1;30(10):802-809. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzy121.
8
Impact of Compliance with a Sepsis Resuscitation Bundle in a Portuguese Emergency Department.葡萄牙急诊科中脓毒症复苏集束化治疗依从性的影响
Acta Med Port. 2016 Feb;29(2):88-94. doi: 10.20344/amp.6998. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
9
Implementation of sepsis management guideline in a community-based teaching hospital - can education be potentially beneficial for septic patients?社区教学医院中脓毒症管理指南的实施-教育对脓毒症患者是否可能有益?
Int J Clin Pract. 2012 Jul;66(7):705-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02939.x.
10
Early diagnosis of sepsis in emergency departments, time to treatment, and association with mortality: An observational study.急诊科脓毒症的早期诊断、治疗时间与死亡率的关系:一项观察性研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 22;15(1):e0227652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227652. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical impact of the implementation of monocyte distribution width (MDW) measurement on time to anti-infective administration in sepsis patients in the emergency department: a before/after cohort study.急诊脓毒症患者实施单核细胞分布宽度(MDW)测量对开始抗感染治疗时间的临床影响:一项前后队列研究。
Crit Care. 2024 Oct 27;28(1):346. doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-05141-5.
2
Effect of a quality improvement program on compliance to the sepsis bundle in non-ICU patients: a multicenter prospective before and after cohort study.质量改进项目对非重症监护病房患者脓毒症集束化治疗依从性的影响:一项多中心前瞻性队列前后对照研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 13;10:1215341. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1215341. eCollection 2023.
3
Facilitators and barriers of appropriate and timely initiation of intravenous fluids in patients with sepsis in emergency departments: a consensus development Delphi study.急诊科脓毒症患者适当及时启动静脉输液的促进因素和障碍:一项德尔菲共识发展研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Oct 27;22(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01561-w.
4
Identifying factors associated with intravenous fluid administration in patients with sepsis presenting to the emergency department: a retrospective cohort study.确定在因败血症而到急诊就诊的患者中与静脉输液相关的因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jun 3;22(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00650-4.
5
Early fluid bolus in adults with sepsis in the emergency department: a systematic review, meta-analysis and narrative synthesis.急诊脓毒症成人早期液体冲击治疗:系统评价、荟萃分析和叙述性综合。
BMC Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 11;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00558-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016.拯救脓毒症运动:脓毒症与脓毒性休克管理国际指南:2016版
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):486-552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255.
2
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
3
SEPSIS KILLS: early intervention saves lives.脓毒症夺命:早期干预可拯救生命。
Med J Aust. 2016 Feb 1;204(2):73. doi: 10.5694/mja15.00657.
4
Epidemiology of severe sepsis: 2008-2012.严重脓毒症的流行病学:2008 - 2012年
J Crit Care. 2016 Feb;31(1):58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.09.034. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
5
Emergency Department Management of Sepsis Patients: A Randomized, Goal-Oriented, Noninvasive Sepsis Trial.急诊脓毒症患者管理:一项随机、目标导向、非侵入性脓毒症试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2016 Mar;67(3):367-378.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.09.010. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
6
A quality improvement project to improve early sepsis care in the emergency department.一项旨在改善急诊科早期脓毒症护理的质量改进项目。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Dec;24(12):787-95. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003552. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
7
Diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness of automated electronic sepsis alert systems: A systematic review.自动化电子脓毒症警报系统的诊断准确性和有效性:系统评价。
J Hosp Med. 2015 Jun;10(6):396-402. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2347. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
8
Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.循环休克与血流动力学监测共识。欧洲重症监护医学学会特别工作组。
Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1795-815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
9
Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock.目标导向性复苏治疗早期感染性休克患者。
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 16;371(16):1496-506. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1404380. Epub 2014 Oct 1.
10
International evidence-based recommendations for focused cardiac ultrasound.国际心脏超声临床实践指南推荐
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Jul;27(7):683.e1-683.e33. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.001.

急诊科严重脓毒症的识别与治疗:法国两家教学医院的回顾性研究

Recognition and treatment of severe sepsis in the emergency department: retrospective study in two French teaching hospitals.

作者信息

Le Conte Philippe, Thibergien Séverin, Obellianne Jean Batiste, Montassier Emmanuel, Potel Gilles, Roy Pierre Marie, Batard Eric

机构信息

Service des urgences, CHU de Nantes, 44035, Nantes cedex 01, France.

Service des urgences, CHU d'Angers, 49000, Angers cedex, France.

出版信息

BMC Emerg Med. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12873-017-0133-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12873-017-0133-6
PMID:28854874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5575926/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis management in the Emergency Department remains a daily challenge. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) has released three-hour bundle. The implementation of these bundles in European Emergency Departments remains poorly described. The main objective was to assess the compliance with the Severe Sepsis Campaign 3-h bundle (blood culture, lactate dosage, first dose of antibiotics and 30 ml/kg fluid challenge). Secondary objectives were the analysis of the delay of severe sepsis recognition and description of the population.

METHODS

In accordance with STROBE statement, we performed a retrospective study in two French University Hospital Emergency Departments from February to August 2015. Patients admitted during the study period were screened using the electronic files of the hospital databases. Patient's files were reviewed and included in the study if they met severe sepsis criteria. Demographics, comorbities, treatments were recorded. Delays from admission to severe sepsis diagnosis, fluid loading onset and antibiotics administration were calculated.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty patients were included (76 men, mean age 71 ± 14 years). Blood culture, lactate dosage, antibiotics and 30 ml/kg fluid loading were performed within 3 hours in % [95% confidence interval] 100% [96-100%], 62% [54-70%], 49% [41-58%] and 19% [13-27%], respectively. 25 patients out of 130 (19% [13-27%]) fulfilled each criteria of the 3-h bundle. The mean fluid loading volume was 18 ± 11 ml/kg. Mean delay between presentation and severe sepsis diagnosis was 200 ± 263 min, from diagnosis to fluid challenge and first antibiotic dose, 10 ± 27 min and 20 ± 55 min, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compliance with SSC 3-h bundle and delay between admission and sepsis recognition have to be improved. If confirmed by other studies, an improvement program might be deployed.

摘要

背景

急诊科的脓毒症管理仍是日常面临的挑战。拯救脓毒症运动(SSC)发布了三小时集束化治疗方案。这些集束化治疗方案在欧洲急诊科的实施情况仍鲜有描述。主要目的是评估对严重脓毒症运动三小时集束化治疗方案(血培养、乳酸盐检测、首剂抗生素及30ml/kg液体冲击)的依从性。次要目的是分析严重脓毒症识别的延迟情况并描述研究人群。

方法

根据加强流行病学观察性研究报告规范(STROBE)声明,我们于2015年2月至8月在两家法国大学医院急诊科进行了一项回顾性研究。利用医院数据库的电子档案筛选研究期间收治的患者。若患者病历符合严重脓毒症标准,则对其进行复查并纳入研究。记录人口统计学资料、合并症及治疗情况。计算从入院到严重脓毒症诊断、开始液体复苏及给予抗生素的延迟时间。

结果

共纳入130例患者(76例男性,平均年龄71±14岁)。血培养、乳酸盐检测、抗生素及30ml/kg液体复苏在3小时内完成的比例[95%置信区间]分别为100%[96 - 100%]、62%[54 - 70%]、49%[41 - 58%]和19%[13 - 27%]。130例患者中有25例(19%[13 - 27%])符合三小时集束化治疗方案的各项标准。平均液体复苏量为18±11ml/kg。从就诊到严重脓毒症诊断的平均延迟时间为200±263分钟,从诊断到液体冲击及首剂抗生素给药的平均延迟时间分别为10±27分钟和20±55分钟。

结论

必须提高对SSC三小时集束化治疗方案的依从性以及入院与脓毒症识别之间的延迟时间。若其他研究予以证实,则可开展改进项目。