Suppr超能文献

开发用于评估分娩体验的问卷(QACE)。

Development of a questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE).

机构信息

University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Western Switzerland, 47 Avenue de Champel, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland.

Pôle Femmes et Enfants, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, site Estaing, 1 place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, 63003, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France.

出版信息

BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1462-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Due to its potential impact on women's psychological health, assessing perceptions of their childbirth experience is important. The aim of this study was to develop a multidimensional self-reporting questionnaire to evaluate the childbirth experience.

METHODS

Factors influencing the childbirth experience were identified from a literature review and the results of a previous qualitative study. A total of 25 items were combined from existing instruments or were created de novo. A draft version was pilot tested for face validity with 30 women and submitted for evaluation of its construct validity to 477 primiparous women at one-month post-partum. The recruitment took place in two obstetric clinics from Swiss and French university hospitals. To evaluate the content validity, we compared item responses to general childbirth experience assessments on a numeric, 0 to 10 rating scale. We dichotomized two group assessment scores: "0 to 7" and "8 to 10". We performed an exploratory factor analysis to identify underlying dimensions.

RESULTS

In total, 291 women completed the questionnaire (response rate = 61%). The responses to 22 items were statistically significant between the 0 to 7 and 8 to 10 groups for the general childbirth experience assessments. An exploratory factor analysis yielded four sub-scales, which were labelled "relationship with staff" (4 items), "emotional status" (3 items), "first moments with the new born," (3 items) and "feelings at one month postpartum" (3 items). All 4 scales had satisfactory internal consistency levels (alpha coefficients from 0.70 to 0.85). The full 25-item version can be used to analyse each item by itself, and the short 4-dimension version can be scored to summarize the general assessment of the childbirth experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The Questionnaire for Assessing the Childbirth Experience (QACE) could be useful as a screening instrument to identify women with negative childbirth experiences. It can be used as both a research instrument in its short version and a questionnaire for use in clinical practice in its full version.

摘要

背景

由于其对女性心理健康的潜在影响,评估她们的分娩体验很重要。本研究的目的是开发一种多维的自我报告问卷来评估分娩体验。

方法

从文献回顾和先前的定性研究结果中确定了影响分娩体验的因素。共有 25 个项目来自现有工具或全新创建。一个草案版本被提交给 477 名初产妇进行结构有效性评估,这些初产妇在产后一个月时在瑞士和法国大学医院的两个产科诊所招募。为了评估内容有效性,我们将项目反应与数字、0 到 10 的评分量表上的一般分娩体验评估进行了比较。我们将两组评估分数分为“0 到 7”和“8 到 10”。我们进行了探索性因子分析以确定潜在维度。

结果

共有 291 名女性完成了问卷(回应率为 61%)。在一般分娩体验评估中,22 个项目的反应在 0 到 7 组和 8 到 10 组之间存在统计学差异。探索性因子分析产生了四个子量表,分别命名为“与工作人员的关系”(4 个项目)、“情绪状态”(3 个项目)、“新生儿的第一刻”(3 个项目)和“产后一个月的感觉”(3 个项目)。所有 4 个量表的内部一致性水平均较高(alpha 系数为 0.70 至 0.85)。完整的 25 项版本可用于分析每个项目本身,而简短的 4 维度版本可用于评分以总结分娩体验的总体评估。

结论

分娩体验评估问卷(QACE)可用作识别负面分娩体验的女性的筛选工具。它可以作为研究工具的简短版本和临床实践中的问卷使用。

相似文献

1
Development of a questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE).
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Aug 30;17(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12884-017-1462-x.
3
Childbirth experience questionnaire (CEQ): development and evaluation of a multidimensional instrument.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010 Dec 10;10:81. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-81.
4
Adaptation of short version of questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE) to the Iranian culture.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Oct 12;20(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03317-9.
5
How does delivery method influence factors that contribute to women's childbirth experiences?
Midwifery. 2016 Dec;43:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
6
[Validation of the questionnaire for assessing the childbirth experience (QACE) in a French population].
Encephale. 2021 Aug;47(4):326-333. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.06.016. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
7
Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the Childbirth Experience Questionnaire (CEQ).
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Dec 10;2020:6879283. doi: 10.1155/2020/6879283. eCollection 2020.
8
Development and psychometric testing of the scales for measuring maternal satisfaction in normal and caesarean birth.
Midwifery. 2012 Jun;28(3):348-57. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2011.03.009. Epub 2011 May 4.
9
Development of the Childbirth Perception Scale (CPS): perception of delivery and the first postpartum week.
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014 Oct;17(5):411-21. doi: 10.1007/s00737-014-0420-0. Epub 2014 Mar 25.

引用本文的文献

3
Childbirth experience assessment tools based on COSMIN guidelines: A systematic review.
Int J Nurs Sci. 2024 Dec 10;12(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.12.001. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Empowering Expecting Mothers: The Impact of Antenatal Classes on Child Birth Experience.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):e68299. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68299. eCollection 2024 Aug.
5
Measuring Women's Satisfaction with Childbirth: A Literature Review of Measurement Properties.
Zdr Varst. 2024 Mar 20;63(2):100-108. doi: 10.2478/sjph-2024-0014. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Insights into women's experiences of giving birth during the coronavirus disease-19 pandemic in Jordan, a cross-sectional survey.
Womens Health (Lond). 2023 Jan-Dec;19:17455057231199038. doi: 10.1177/17455057231199038.
7
Women satisfaction on choosing the cervical ripening method: Oral misoprostol versus balloon catheter.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2023 Jun 16;19:100202. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2023.100202. eCollection 2023 Sep.
8
Women's satisfaction with maternal care services in Georgia.
Health Policy Open. 2021 Jan 18;2:100028. doi: 10.1016/j.hpopen.2020.100028. eCollection 2021 Dec.
10
'Labour Hopscotch': Women's evaluation of using the steps during labor.
Eur J Midwifery. 2022 Sep 9;6:59. doi: 10.18332/ejm/152492. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
How does delivery method influence factors that contribute to women's childbirth experiences?
Midwifery. 2016 Dec;43:21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Oct 8.
2
The effects of counseling on fear of childbirth.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Jun;94(6):629-36. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12634. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
3
Women's experiences of coping with pain during childbirth: a critical review of qualitative research.
Midwifery. 2015 Mar;31(3):349-58. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.12.005. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
5
Impact of mode of delivery on the birth experience in first-time mothers: a qualitative study.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Aug 1;14:254. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-14-254.
6
Sample size for pre-tests of questionnaires.
Qual Life Res. 2015 Jan;24(1):147-51. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0752-2. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
7
Predicting posttraumatic stress disorder after childbirth.
Midwifery. 2014 Aug;30(8):935-41. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
Recommendations for reporting the results of studies of instrument and scale development and testing.
J Adv Nurs. 2014 Sep;70(9):1970-1979. doi: 10.1111/jan.12402. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
9
Development of the Childbirth Perception Scale (CPS): perception of delivery and the first postpartum week.
Arch Womens Ment Health. 2014 Oct;17(5):411-21. doi: 10.1007/s00737-014-0420-0. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
10
Development of the Pregnancy and Childbirth Questionnaire (PCQ): evaluating quality of care as perceived by women who recently gave birth.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Mar;174:35-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.019. Epub 2013 Dec 1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验