• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测 72 小时内急诊复诊。

Predicting 72-hour emergency department revisits.

机构信息

US Department of Veterans Affairs, Stratton VA Medical Center, 113 Holland Ave., Albany, NY 12208, United States.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;36(3):420-424. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.08.049. Epub 2017 Aug 25.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.08.049
PMID:28855065
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop a predictive model that hospitals or healthcare systems can use to identify patients at high risk of revisiting the ED within 72h so that appropriate interventions can be delivered.

METHODS

This study employed multivariate logistic regression in developing the predictive model. The study data were from four Veterans medical centers in Upstate New York; 21,141 patients in total with ED visits were included in the analysis. Fiscal Year (FY) 2013 data were used to predict revisits in FY 2014. The predictive variables were patient demographics, prior year healthcare utilizations, and comorbidities. To avoid overfitting, we validated the model by the split-sample method. The predictive power of the model is measured by c-statistic.

RESULTS

In the first model using only patient demographics, the c-statistics were 0.55 (CI: 0.52-0.57) and 0.54 (95% CI: 0.51-0.56) for the development and validation samples, respectively. In the second model with prior year utilization added, the c-statistics were 0.70 (95% CI: 0.68-0.72) for both samples. In the final model where comorbidities were added, the c-statistics were 0.74 (CI: 0.72-0.76) and 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.75) for the development and validation samples, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Reducing ED revisits not only lowers healthcare cost but also shortens wait time for those who critically need ED care. However, broad intervention for every ED visitor is not feasible given limited resources. In this study, we developed a predictive model that hospitals and healthcare systems can use to identify "frequent flyers" for early interventions to reduce ED revisits.

摘要

目的

开发一种预测模型,使医院或医疗系统能够识别在 72 小时内再次到急诊科就诊的高风险患者,以便提供适当的干预措施。

方法

本研究采用多元逻辑回归方法开发预测模型。研究数据来自纽约州北部的四家退伍军人医疗中心;共纳入 21141 例急诊科就诊患者进行分析。使用 2013 财年的数据预测 2014 财年的复诊情况。预测变量为患者人口统计学特征、前一年的医疗保健利用情况和合并症。为避免过度拟合,我们采用拆分样本法对模型进行验证。模型的预测能力用 C 统计量来衡量。

结果

在仅使用患者人口统计学特征的第一个模型中,开发样本和验证样本的 C 统计量分别为 0.55(95%CI:0.52-0.57)和 0.54(95%CI:0.51-0.56)。在加入前一年利用情况的第二个模型中,两个样本的 C 统计量均为 0.70(95%CI:0.68-0.72)。在加入合并症的最终模型中,开发样本和验证样本的 C 统计量分别为 0.74(95%CI:0.72-0.76)和 0.73(95%CI:0.71-0.75)。

结论

降低急诊科复诊率不仅可以降低医疗成本,还可以缩短那些急需急诊科护理的患者的等待时间。然而,鉴于有限的资源,对每个急诊科就诊者进行广泛的干预是不可行的。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种预测模型,医院和医疗系统可以使用该模型来识别“常客”,以便进行早期干预,减少急诊科复诊。

相似文献

1
Predicting 72-hour emergency department revisits.预测 72 小时内急诊复诊。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;36(3):420-424. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.08.049. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
2
Predicting 30-day emergency department revisits.预测 30 天内急诊复诊。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Nov 1;24(11):e358-e364.
3
Patient returns to the emergency department: the time-to-return curve.患者返回急诊科:时间返回曲线。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;21(8):864-71. doi: 10.1111/acem.12442. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
4
Predicting potentially avoidable hospitalizations.预测潜在可避免的住院治疗。
Med Care. 2014 Feb;52(2):164-71. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000041.
5
Predicting hospital admissions at emergency department triage using routine administrative data.利用常规行政数据预测急诊科分诊的住院人数。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Aug;18(8):844-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01125.x.
6
Predicting frequent emergency department use among children with epilepsy: A retrospective cohort study using electronic health data from 2 centers.预测癫痫儿童中频繁使用急诊部门:来自 2 个中心的电子健康数据的回顾性队列研究。
Epilepsia. 2018 Jan;59(1):155-169. doi: 10.1111/epi.13948. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
7
Predicting frequent ED use by people with epilepsy with health information exchange data.利用健康信息交换数据预测癫痫患者频繁急诊就诊情况。
Neurology. 2015 Sep 22;85(12):1031-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001944. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
8
Derivation and preliminary validation of a risk score to predict 30-day ED revisits for sickle cell pain.用于预测镰状细胞疼痛30天急诊科再就诊风险评分的推导与初步验证
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;33(10):1396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
9
Emergency department revisits for pediatric acute asthma exacerbations: association of factors identified in an emergency department asthma tracking system.儿科急性哮喘加重的急诊科复诊:急诊科哮喘追踪系统中确定的因素之间的关联
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2008 Aug;24(8):505-10. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318180fdcb.
10
Clinical implementation of systematic medication reconciliation and review as part of the Lund Integrated Medicines Management model--impact on all-cause emergency department revisits.作为隆德综合药物管理模式的一部分,临床实施系统药物重整和审查对所有原因急诊复诊的影响。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2012 Dec;37(6):686-92. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12001. Epub 2012 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency room readmission, an avoidable problem? Analysis and stratification of readmissions in a trauma reference center.急诊再入院:可避免的问题?创伤救治中心再入院的分析和分层。
Rev Col Bras Cir. 2024 Jul 5;51:e20243704. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20243704-en. eCollection 2024.
2
Prediction of high-risk emergency department revisits from a machine-learning algorithm: a proof-of-concept study.基于机器学习算法的高危急诊科复诊预测:概念验证研究。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2024 Apr 22;31(1):e100859. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100859.
3
Machine learning models for predicting unscheduled return visits of patients with abdominal pain at emergency department and validation during COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study.
基于机器学习模型预测急诊科腹痛患者非计划性复诊及在 COVID-19 大流行期间的验证:一项回顾性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 23;103(8):e37220. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037220.
4
Prediction of emergency department revisits among child and youth mental health outpatients using deep learning techniques.使用深度学习技术预测儿童和青少年心理健康门诊患者的急诊科复诊情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Feb 8;24(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02450-1.
5
Machine learning models for predicting unscheduled return visits to an emergency department: a scoping review.机器学习模型预测急诊非计划性复诊:范围综述。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jan 30;24(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00939-6.
6
Reducing 48-h emergency department revisits and subsequent admissions: a retrospective study of increased emergency medicine resident floor coverage.减少48小时内急诊科复诊及后续住院情况:一项关于增加急诊医学住院医师病房查房覆盖率的回顾性研究
Int J Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 6;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12245-022-00471-z.
7
High-risk Return Visits to United States Emergency Departments, 2010-2018.2010-2018 年美国急诊科高危复诊患者。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 18;23(6):832-840. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.57028.
8
A Machine Learning Model for Predicting Unscheduled 72 h Return Visits to the Emergency Department by Patients with Abdominal Pain.一种用于预测腹痛患者非计划72小时内返回急诊科就诊情况的机器学习模型。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Dec 30;12(1):82. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12010082.
9
Emergency department bounceback characteristics for patients diagnosed with COVID-19.急诊 COVID-19 患者反弹特征。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Sep;47:239-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.050. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
10
The Association Between Emergency Department Revisit and Elderly Patients.急诊科复诊与老年患者之间的关联
J Acute Med. 2020 Mar 1;10(1):20-26. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202003_10(1).0003.