• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Predicting frequent ED use by people with epilepsy with health information exchange data.利用健康信息交换数据预测癫痫患者频繁急诊就诊情况。
Neurology. 2015 Sep 22;85(12):1031-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001944. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
2
Predicting frequent emergency department use among children with epilepsy: A retrospective cohort study using electronic health data from 2 centers.预测癫痫儿童中频繁使用急诊部门:来自 2 个中心的电子健康数据的回顾性队列研究。
Epilepsia. 2018 Jan;59(1):155-169. doi: 10.1111/epi.13948. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
3
People with epilepsy who use multiple hospitals; prevalence and associated factors assessed via a health information exchange.使用多家医院的癫痫患者;通过健康信息交换评估的患病率及相关因素。
Epilepsia. 2014 May;55(5):734-745. doi: 10.1111/epi.12552. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
4
Characteristics of frequent users of emergency departments.急诊科频繁使用者的特征。
Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Jul;48(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.12.030. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
5
Screening of mental health and substance users in frequent users of a general Swiss emergency department.对瑞士一家普通急诊科的频繁使用者进行心理健康和药物使用者筛查。
BMC Emerg Med. 2015 Oct 9;15:27. doi: 10.1186/s12873-015-0053-2.
6
Resource utilization and health care charges associated with the most frequent ED users.与最频繁的急诊室使用者相关的资源利用和医疗费用。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;32(10):1215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
7
Describing and predicting frequent users of an emergency department.描述和预测急诊科的频繁使用者。
J Assoc Acad Minor Phys. 2001 Mar;12(1-2):119-23.
8
Analysis of costs, length of stay, and utilization of emergency department services by frequent users: implications for health policy.频繁使用者的成本、住院时间及急诊科服务利用情况分析:对卫生政策的启示
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Dec;11(12):1311-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.07.008.
9
Frequent users of US emergency departments: characteristics and opportunities for intervention.美国急诊科的频繁使用者:特征及干预机会
Emerg Med J. 2014 Jul;31(7):526-532. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-202407. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
10
Frequent emergency department visits are more prevalent in psychiatric, alcohol abuse, and dual diagnosis conditions than in chronic viral illnesses such as hepatitis and human immunodeficiency virus.与慢性病毒性疾病(如肝炎和人类免疫缺陷病毒)相比,频繁就诊于急诊科在精神疾病、酒精滥用及双重诊断情况下更为普遍。
J Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;45(4):520-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.05.007. Epub 2013 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Heavy metal biomarkers and their impact on hearing loss risk: a machine learning framework analysis.重金属生物标志物及其对听力损失风险的影响:一项机器学习框架分析。
Front Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;13:1471490. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1471490. eCollection 2025.
2
Using machine learning to identify frequent attendance at accident and emergency services in Lanarkshire.利用机器学习识别拉纳克郡意外与紧急医疗服务的频繁就诊情况。
Digit Health. 2025 Mar 2;11:20552076251315293. doi: 10.1177/20552076251315293. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Artificial Intelligence Models in Health Information Exchange: A Systematic Review of Clinical Implications.健康信息交换中的人工智能模型:对临床意义的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Sep 19;11(18):2584. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11182584.
4
Disparities in adherence and emergency department utilization among people with epilepsy: A machine learning approach.癫痫患者服药依从性和急诊科利用的差异:一种机器学习方法。
Seizure. 2023 Aug;110:169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2023.06.021. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
5
Machine learning to improve frequent emergency department use prediction: a retrospective cohort study.机器学习改善频繁急诊就诊预测:一项回顾性队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 3;13(1):1981. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-27568-6.
6
Decreasing Emergency Department Visits for Children With Epilepsy.减少癫痫患儿的急诊就诊次数。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2021 Oct;11(5):413-419. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000001109.
7
Automated Identification of Surgical Candidates and Estimation of Postoperative Seizure Freedom in Children - A Focused Review.自动化识别手术候选者和预测儿童术后无癫痫发作——一项聚焦综述。
Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2021 Oct;39:100914. doi: 10.1016/j.spen.2021.100914. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
8
Early identification of epilepsy surgery candidates: A multicenter, machine learning study.早期识别癫痫手术候选人:一项多中心、机器学习研究。
Acta Neurol Scand. 2021 Jul;144(1):41-50. doi: 10.1111/ane.13418. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
9
Design and implementation of electronic health record common data elements for pediatric epilepsy: Foundations for a learning health care system.电子健康记录通用数据元素在儿科癫痫中的设计与实现:迈向学习型医疗保健系统的基础。
Epilepsia. 2021 Jan;62(1):198-216. doi: 10.1111/epi.16733. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
10
Persistent frequent emergency department users with chronic conditions: A population-based cohort study.患有慢性病的持续性频繁急诊就诊者:一项基于人群的队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 12;15(2):e0229022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229022. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
People with epilepsy who use multiple hospitals; prevalence and associated factors assessed via a health information exchange.使用多家医院的癫痫患者;通过健康信息交换评估的患病率及相关因素。
Epilepsia. 2014 May;55(5):734-745. doi: 10.1111/epi.12552. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
2
Cost-effective: emergency department care coordination with a regional hospital information system.具有成本效益:急诊科护理与区域医院信息系统的协调
J Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;47(2):223-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.11.073. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
3
Health information exchange improves identification of frequent emergency department users.健康信息交换可改善对频繁使用急诊部患者的识别。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Dec;32(12):2193-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0167.
4
Dispelling an urban legend: frequent emergency department users have substantial burden of disease.破除都市传说:频繁使用急诊的患者有大量未确诊的疾病。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Dec;32(12):2099-108. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1276.
5
Non-emergency department interventions to reduce ED utilization: a systematic review.非急诊部门干预措施以减少急诊部门的利用:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(10):969-85. doi: 10.1111/acem.12219.
6
A case series using a care management checklist to decrease emergency department visits and hospitalizations in children with epilepsy.一项使用护理管理清单以减少癫痫患儿急诊就诊和住院次数的病例系列研究。
J Child Neurol. 2014 Feb;29(2):243-6. doi: 10.1177/0883073813500851. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
7
Behind the scenes. Although patients may not know it, ACOs are increasingly on their team, aiming to provide better care at lower costs.幕后情况。尽管患者可能并不知晓,但负责协调医疗的组织(ACO)越来越多地站在他们这一边,旨在以更低的成本提供更好的护理。
Mod Healthc. 2013 Apr 1;43(13):30-2, 35.
8
Is secondary preventive care improving? Observational study of 10-year trends in emergency admissions for conditions amenable to ambulatory care.二级预防保健是否有所改善?可进行门诊治疗的疾病急诊入院 10 年趋势的观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2013 Jan 2;3(1):e002007. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002007.
9
A nurse-led self-management intervention for people who attend emergency departments with epilepsy: the patients' view.护士主导的癫痫急诊患者自我管理干预:患者观点。
J Neurol. 2013 Apr;260(4):1022-30. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6749-2. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
10
Explanations given by people with epilepsy for using emergency medical services: a qualitative study.癫痫患者使用急救医疗服务的原因解释:一项定性研究。
Epilepsy Behav. 2012 Dec;25(4):529-33. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.09.034. Epub 2012 Nov 13.

利用健康信息交换数据预测癫痫患者频繁急诊就诊情况。

Predicting frequent ED use by people with epilepsy with health information exchange data.

作者信息

Grinspan Zachary M, Shapiro Jason S, Abramson Erika L, Hooker Giles, Kaushal Rainu, Kern Lisa M

机构信息

From the Departments of Healthcare Research and Policy (Z.M.G., E.L.A., G.H., R.K.), Pediatrics (Z.M.G., E.L.A., R.K.), and Medicine (R.K., L.M.K.), and Center for Healthcare Informatics and Policy (Z.M.G., E.L.A., G.H., R.K., L.M.K.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; New York Presbyterian Hospital (Z.M.G., E.L.A., R.K., L.M.K.); Department of Emergency Medicine (J.S.S.), Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York; Health Information Technology Evaluation Collaborative (E.L.A., R.K., L.M.K.), New York; and Departments of Statistical Science (G.H.) and Biological Statistics and Computational Biology (G.H.), Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.

出版信息

Neurology. 2015 Sep 22;85(12):1031-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001944. Epub 2015 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001944
PMID:26311752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4603600/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To describe (1) the predictability of frequent emergency department (ED) use (a marker of inadequate disease control and/or poor access to care), and (2) the demographics, comorbidities, and use of health services of frequent ED users, among people with epilepsy.

METHODS

We obtained demographics, comorbidities, and 2 years of encounter data for 8,041 people with epilepsy from a health information exchange in New York City. Using a retrospective cohort design, we explored bivariate relationships between baseline characteristics (year 1) and subsequent frequent ED use (year 2). We then built, evaluated, and compared predictive models to identify frequent ED users (≥4 visits year 2), using multiple techniques (logistic regression, lasso, elastic net, CART [classification and regression trees], Random Forests, AdaBoost, support vector machines). We selected a final model based on performance and simplicity.

RESULTS

People with epilepsy who, in year 1, were adults (rather than children or seniors), male, Manhattan residents, frequent users of health services, users of multiple health systems, or had medical, neurologic, or psychiatric comorbidities, were more likely to frequently use the ED in year 2. Predictive techniques identified frequent ED visitors with good positive predictive value (approximately 70%) but poor sensitivity (approximately 20%). A simple strategy, selecting individuals with 11+ ED visits in year 1, performed as well as more sophisticated models.

CONCLUSIONS

People with epilepsy with 11+ ED visits in a year are at highest risk of continued frequent ED use and may benefit from targeted intervention to avoid preventable ED visits. Future work should focus on improving the sensitivity of predictions.

摘要

目的

描述(1)频繁使用急诊科(ED)(疾病控制不佳和/或获得医疗服务不便的一个指标)的可预测性,以及(2)癫痫患者中频繁使用急诊科者的人口统计学特征、合并症和医疗服务使用情况。

方法

我们从纽约市的一个健康信息交换平台获取了8041名癫痫患者的人口统计学特征、合并症以及两年的就诊数据。采用回顾性队列设计,我们探讨了基线特征(第1年)与随后频繁使用急诊科(第2年)之间的双变量关系。然后,我们构建、评估并比较了预测模型,以识别频繁使用急诊科者(第2年≥4次就诊),使用了多种技术(逻辑回归、套索回归、弹性网络、分类与回归树、随机森林、自适应增强、支持向量机)。我们根据性能和简易性选择了最终模型。

结果

在第1年为成年人(而非儿童或老年人)、男性、曼哈顿居民、频繁使用医疗服务者、使用多个医疗系统者或患有内科、神经科或精神科合并症的癫痫患者,在第2年更有可能频繁使用急诊科。预测技术识别出频繁就诊的急诊科患者具有良好的阳性预测值(约70%)但敏感性较差(约20%)。一种简单的策略,即选择第1年有11次以上急诊科就诊的个体,其表现与更复杂的模型相当。

结论

一年内有11次以上急诊科就诊的癫痫患者持续频繁使用急诊科的风险最高,可能受益于有针对性的干预措施以避免可预防的急诊科就诊。未来的工作应侧重于提高预测的敏感性。