• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2010-2018 年美国急诊科高危复诊患者。

High-risk Return Visits to United States Emergency Departments, 2010-2018.

机构信息

National Taiwan University Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.

National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Department of Emergency Medicine, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

出版信息

West J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 18;23(6):832-840. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.57028.

DOI:10.5811/westjem.2022.7.57028
PMID:36409935
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9683777/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Although factors related to a return visit to the emergency department (ED) have been reported, only a few studies have examined "high-risk" ED revisits with serious adverse outcomes. In this study we aimed to describe the incidence and trend of high-risk ED revisits in United States EDs and to investigate factors associated with these revisits.

METHODS

We obtained data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS), 2010-2018. Adult ED revisits within 72 hours of a previous discharge were identified using a mark on the patient record form. We defined high-risk revisits as revisits with serious adverse outcomes, including intensive care unit admissions, emergency surgery, cardiac catheterization, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during the return visit. We performed analyses using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression, accounting for NHAMCS's complex survey design.

RESULTS

Over the nine-year study period, there were an estimated 37,700,000 revisits, and the proportion of revisits in the entire ED population decreased slightly from 5.1% in 2010 to 4.5% in 2018 (P for trend = 0.02). By contrast, there were an estimated 827,000 high-risk ED revisits, and the proportion of high-risk revisits in the entire ED population remained stable at approximately 0.1%. The mean age of these high-risk revisit patients was 57 years, and 43% were men. Approximately 6% of the patients were intubated, and 13% received CPR. Most of them were hospitalized, and 2% died in the ED. Multivariable analysis showed that older age (65+ years), Hispanic ethnicity, daytime visits, and arrival by ambulance during the revisit were independent predictors of high-risk revisits.

CONCLUSION

High-risk revisits accounted for a relatively small fraction (0.1%) of ED visits. Over the period of the NHAMCS survey between 2010-2018, this fraction remained stable. We identified factors during the return visit that could be used to label high-risk revisits for timely intervention.

摘要

简介

尽管已有研究报道了与急诊科(ED)复诊相关的因素,但仅有少数研究探讨了存在严重不良结局的“高危”ED 复诊。本研究旨在描述美国 ED 高危复诊的发生率和趋势,并探讨与这些复诊相关的因素。

方法

我们从 2010 年至 2018 年的国家医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)中获取数据。通过患者记录表单上的标记识别 72 小时内从前一次出院后再次到 ED 的复诊患者。我们将高危复诊定义为在复诊期间有入住重症监护病房、紧急手术、心导管检查或心肺复苏(CPR)等严重不良结局的复诊。我们使用描述性统计和多变量逻辑回归进行分析,同时考虑了 NHAMCS 的复杂调查设计。

结果

在 9 年的研究期间,估计有 3770 万次复诊,复诊在整个 ED 就诊人群中的比例从 2010 年的 5.1%略有下降至 2018 年的 4.5%(趋势 P 值=0.02)。相比之下,估计有 82.7 万次高危 ED 复诊,复诊在整个 ED 就诊人群中的比例保持稳定,约为 0.1%。这些高危复诊患者的平均年龄为 57 岁,其中 43%为男性。大约 6%的患者需要插管,13%接受了 CPR。他们中的大多数人住院治疗,有 2%在 ED 死亡。多变量分析显示,年龄较大(65 岁以上)、西班牙裔、白天就诊以及在复诊时乘坐救护车到达是高危复诊的独立预测因素。

结论

高危复诊占 ED 就诊的比例相对较小(0.1%)。在 NHAMCS 调查期间(2010-2018 年),这一比例保持稳定。我们确定了复诊期间的一些因素,可以用来标记高危复诊,以便及时干预。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbd/9683777/db35bec85fd2/wjem-23-832-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbd/9683777/675b2b7850c4/wjem-23-832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbd/9683777/f6884e4f3f4a/wjem-23-832-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbd/9683777/db35bec85fd2/wjem-23-832-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbd/9683777/675b2b7850c4/wjem-23-832-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbd/9683777/f6884e4f3f4a/wjem-23-832-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9cbd/9683777/db35bec85fd2/wjem-23-832-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
High-risk Return Visits to United States Emergency Departments, 2010-2018.2010-2018 年美国急诊科高危复诊患者。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 18;23(6):832-840. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.57028.
2
Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in United States emergency departments, 2010-2018.2010-2018 年美国急诊科慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性加重。
BMC Pulm Med. 2023 Jun 20;23(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02518-0.
3
Pulmonary embolism in United States emergency departments, 2010-2018.美国急诊部的肺栓塞:2010-2018 年。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 5;13(1):9070. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36123-2.
4
In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in United States Emergency Departments, 2010-2018.2010 - 2018年美国急诊科的院内心脏骤停
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 11;9:874461. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.874461. eCollection 2022.
5
Factors associated with a high-risk return visit to the emergency department: a case-crossover study.与急诊高危复诊相关的因素:病例交叉研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 1;28(5):394-401. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000851.
6
Return to the emergency department after ventricular shunt evaluation.心室分流评估后返回急诊科。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Apr;17(4):397-402. doi: 10.3171/2015.8.PEDS15309. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
7
Predicting Emergency Department "Bouncebacks": A Retrospective Cohort Analysis.预测急诊科“复诊”:一项回顾性队列分析。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 16;20(6):865-874. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.8.43221.
8
Bouncing Back Elsewhere: Multilevel Analysis of Return Visits to the Same or a Different Hospital After Initial Emergency Department Presentation.在其他地方反弹:初始急诊科就诊后再次返回同一或不同医院的多水平分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 May;71(5):555-563.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.08.023. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
Geriatric Falls: Patient Characteristics Associated with Emergency Department Revisits.老年患者跌倒:与急诊科复诊相关的患者特征。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep 12;23(5):734-738. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.6.55666.
10
A Retrospective Nested Cohort Study of Emergency Department Revisits for Migraine in New York City.一项针对纽约市急诊偏头痛复诊的回顾性巢式队列研究。
Headache. 2018 Mar;58(3):399-406. doi: 10.1111/head.13216. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
A Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease Hospital Admission for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections From an Observation Unit.一项旨在减少观察病房皮肤和软组织感染患者住院率的质量改进计划。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 May 6;6(3):100140. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100140. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Factors associated with overall and high-risk return visits to the emergency department: a vital sign trajectory approach.与急诊科总体及高危复诊相关的因素:一种生命体征轨迹方法。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 12;25(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01211-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Inpatient Outcomes Following a Return Visit to the Emergency Department: A Nationwide Cohort Study.急诊复诊患者的住院结局:一项全国性队列研究。
West J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 30;22(5):1124-1130. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.6.52212.
2
Factors associated with a high-risk return visit to the emergency department: a case-crossover study.与急诊高危复诊相关的因素:病例交叉研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct 1;28(5):394-401. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000851.
3
Risk factors of admission in 72-h return visits to emergency department.急诊科72小时复诊入院的危险因素。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2020 Dec 24;33(2):169-174. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_155_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
4
Clinical Predictors of Emergency Department Revisits within 48 Hours of Discharge; a Case Control Study.出院后48小时内急诊科复诊的临床预测因素;一项病例对照研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2020 Nov 5;9(1):e1. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v9i1.891. eCollection 2021.
5
Characteristics of Febrile Children Admitted to the ICU Following an Unscheduled ED Revisit Within 72 h, a Case-Control Study.72小时内非计划重返急诊科后入住重症监护病房的发热儿童特征:一项病例对照研究
Front Pediatr. 2020 Aug 7;8:411. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00411. eCollection 2020.
6
Physician-related factors associated with unscheduled revisits to the emergency department and admission to the intensive care unit within 72 h.与急诊 72 小时内非计划性复诊和转入重症监护病房相关的与医师相关的因素。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 3;10(1):13060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70021-1.
7
Emergency department revisits: a nation-wide database analysis on the same and different hospital revisits.急诊科复诊:基于全国数据库的同一医院和不同医院复诊分析。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2020 Apr;27(2):114-120. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000650.
8
Characteristics and determinants of high-risk unscheduled return visits to the emergency department.急诊科高危非计划复诊的特征与决定因素
Emerg Med J. 2020 Feb;37(2):79-84. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-208343. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
9
Risk Factors Associated with Emergency Department Recidivism in the Older Adult.老年人急诊科再次就诊的相关风险因素。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 14;20(6):931-938. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.7.43073.
10
Unscheduled return visits to the emergency department with ICU admission: A trigger tool for diagnostic error.非计划性返回急诊部并收入 ICU:诊断错误的触发工具。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Aug;38(8):1584-1587. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.158430. Epub 2019 Sep 6.