• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测 30 天内急诊复诊。

Predicting 30-day emergency department revisits.

机构信息

Stratton VA Medical Center, US Department of Veterans Affairs, 113 Holland Ave, Albany, NY 12208. Email:

出版信息

Am J Manag Care. 2018 Nov 1;24(11):e358-e364.

PMID:30452204
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To develop a predictive model that hospitals or healthcare systems can use to identify patients at high risk of revisiting the emergency department (ED) within 30 days and thus reduce unnecessary ED use through proactive interventions.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of fiscal years (FYs) 2013 and 2014 data from 4 Veterans Affairs hospitals in upstate New York.

METHODS

This study developed a predictive model based on administrative data, a publicly available patient classification system, and logistic regression. The study data were from 4 Veterans Affairs hospitals in upstate New York; FY 2013 data were used to predict 30-day revisits in FY 2014. All 22,734 patients with ED visits were included in the analysis. The predictive variables were patient demographics, prior-year utilization, and comorbidities. To prevent overfitting, we validated the model by the split-sample method. The predictive power of the model is measured by C statistics.

RESULTS

In the first model using only patient demographics, the C statistics were 0.568 (95% CI, 0.555-0.580) and 0.556 (95% CI, 0.543-0.568) for the development and validation samples, respectively. In the second model with prior-year utilization added, the C statistics were 0.748 (95% CI, 0.737-0.759) for both samples. In the final model with comorbidities added, the C statistics reached 0.773 (95% CI, 0.762-0.784) and 0.763 (95% CI, 0.753-0.774) for the development and validation samples, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The predictive model we developed in this study is straightforward to implement and offers significantly higher predictive power than other models reported in the literature. Hospitals and healthcare systems can use it to identify high-risk "frequent flyers" for early interventions to reduce ED revisits.

摘要

目的

开发一种预测模型,使医院或医疗系统能够识别在 30 天内再次访问急诊部(ED)的高风险患者,从而通过主动干预减少不必要的 ED 使用。

研究设计

对纽约州北部 4 家退伍军人事务医院的 2013 财年和 2014 财年数据进行回顾性分析。

方法

本研究基于行政数据、公开可用的患者分类系统和逻辑回归开发了一种预测模型。研究数据来自纽约州北部的 4 家退伍军人事务医院;2013 财年的数据用于预测 2014 财年的 30 天内复诊。所有 22734 名 ED 就诊患者均纳入分析。预测变量为患者人口统计学特征、前一年的使用情况和合并症。为了防止过度拟合,我们通过拆分样本法对模型进行验证。模型的预测能力通过 C 统计量来衡量。

结果

在仅使用患者人口统计学特征的第一个模型中,开发和验证样本的 C 统计量分别为 0.568(95%置信区间,0.555-0.580)和 0.556(95%置信区间,0.543-0.568)。在添加前一年使用情况的第二个模型中,两个样本的 C 统计量均为 0.748(95%置信区间,0.737-0.759)。在添加合并症的最终模型中,C 统计量分别达到 0.773(95%置信区间,0.762-0.784)和 0.763(95%置信区间,0.753-0.774)。

结论

本研究开发的预测模型实施简单,预测能力明显高于文献中报道的其他模型。医院和医疗系统可以使用它来识别高风险的“常客”,以便进行早期干预,减少 ED 复诊。

相似文献

1
Predicting 30-day emergency department revisits.预测 30 天内急诊复诊。
Am J Manag Care. 2018 Nov 1;24(11):e358-e364.
2
Predicting 72-hour emergency department revisits.预测 72 小时内急诊复诊。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Mar;36(3):420-424. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.08.049. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
3
Predicting potentially avoidable hospitalizations.预测潜在可避免的住院治疗。
Med Care. 2014 Feb;52(2):164-71. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000041.
4
There Are Sex Differences in the Demographics and Risk Profiles of Emergency Department (ED) Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter, but no Apparent Differences in ED Management or Outcomes.心房颤动和心房扑动急诊科(ED)患者的人口统计学和风险特征存在性别差异,但在急诊科管理或治疗结果方面无明显差异。
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;22(9):1067-75. doi: 10.1111/acem.12750. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
5
Derivation and preliminary validation of a risk score to predict 30-day ED revisits for sickle cell pain.用于预测镰状细胞疼痛30天急诊科再就诊风险评分的推导与初步验证
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;33(10):1396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.07.015. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
6
Patient returns to the emergency department: the time-to-return curve.患者返回急诊科:时间返回曲线。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;21(8):864-71. doi: 10.1111/acem.12442. Epub 2014 Aug 24.
7
Frequency of ED revisits and death among older adults after a fall.老年人跌倒后急诊复诊频率及死亡率
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):1012-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.023. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
8
Emergency department visits in Veterans Affairs medical facilities.退伍军人事务部医疗机构的急诊就诊情况。
Am J Manag Care. 2011 Jun 1;17(6 Spec No.):e215-23.
9
Association Between Physical Therapy in the Emergency Department and Emergency Department Revisits for Older Adult Fallers: A Nationally Representative Analysis.急诊科物理治疗与老年跌倒患者急诊科复诊之间的关联:一项全国代表性分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018 Nov;66(11):2205-2212. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15469. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
10
Early primary care follow-up after ED and hospital discharge - does it affect readmissions?急诊就诊及出院后的早期初级保健随访——会影响再入院率吗?
Hosp Pract (1995). 2017 Apr;45(2):51-57. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2017.1283935. Epub 2017 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Unplanned re-attendance to emergency department of patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome: a situational analysis.全身炎症反应综合征患者非计划性重返急诊科:情境分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12371-y.
2
Prediction of emergency department revisits among child and youth mental health outpatients using deep learning techniques.使用深度学习技术预测儿童和青少年心理健康门诊患者的急诊科复诊情况。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Feb 8;24(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02450-1.
3
Risk Prediction of Emergency Department Visits in Patients With Lung Cancer Using Machine Learning: Retrospective Observational Study.
使用机器学习预测肺癌患者急诊科就诊风险:回顾性观察研究。
JMIR Med Inform. 2023 Dec 6;11:e53058. doi: 10.2196/53058.
4
Patient-Centered Outcomes of an Emergency Department Social and Medical Resource Intervention.急诊科社会和医疗资源干预的以患者为中心的结果。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 21;24(2):193-200. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.10.57096.
5
Reducing 48-h emergency department revisits and subsequent admissions: a retrospective study of increased emergency medicine resident floor coverage.减少48小时内急诊科复诊及后续住院情况:一项关于增加急诊医学住院医师病房查房覆盖率的回顾性研究
Int J Emerg Med. 2022 Dec 6;15(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12245-022-00471-z.
6
High-risk Return Visits to United States Emergency Departments, 2010-2018.2010-2018 年美国急诊科高危复诊患者。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 18;23(6):832-840. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.7.57028.
7
Odds of return: a prospective study using provider assessment to predict short-term patient return visits to the emergency department.复诊几率:一项运用医疗服务提供者评估来预测患者短期急诊复诊情况的前瞻性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 1;11(12):e053918. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053918.
8
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Emergency Department Diagnostic Imaging at US Children's Hospitals, 2016-2019.2016-2019 年美国儿童医院急诊科诊断影像学的种族和民族差异。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2033710. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33710.