Suppr超能文献

尼古丁咀嚼胶随机对照试验的Meta分析

Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials of nicotine chewing-gum.

作者信息

Lam W, Sze P C, Sacks H S, Chalmers T C

出版信息

Lancet. 1987 Jul 4;2(8549):27-30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(87)93061-3.

Abstract

A meta-analysis was made of fourteen randomised controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of nicotine chewing-gum in stopping patients smoking. The combined success rates in specialised cessation clinics are significantly higher with nicotine gum (27%) than with placebo gum (18%) at 6 months (n = 734), and 23% and 13% at 12 months, respectively. In contrast, success rates in general medical practices are similar with nicotine gum (11.4%) and with placebo gum (11.7%) at 6 months (n = 1022). However, in general practices, the success rates are 17% for nicotine gum and 13% for the no gum control at 4-6 months, and 9% and 5% at 12 months, a significant difference between the treatments at each time (n = 2238). The data suggest that proper use of nicotine gum in specialised clinics will increase the rate of stopping patients smoking. The use of the gum in general medical practices is questionable.

摘要

对14项评估尼古丁咀嚼胶帮助患者戒烟疗效的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析。在专门的戒烟诊所,6个月时(n = 734),使用尼古丁口香糖的综合成功率(27%)显著高于使用安慰剂口香糖的成功率(18%),12个月时分别为23%和13%。相比之下,在普通医疗实践中,6个月时(n = 1022),使用尼古丁口香糖(11.4%)和使用安慰剂口香糖(11.7%)的成功率相似。然而,在普通医疗实践中,4 - 6个月时尼古丁口香糖的成功率为17%,不使用口香糖对照组的成功率为13%,12个月时分别为9%和5%,每次治疗之间均存在显著差异(n = 2238)。数据表明,在专门诊所正确使用尼古丁口香糖将提高患者戒烟率。在普通医疗实践中使用口香糖的效果值得怀疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验