• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内侧上髁切除术治疗肘管综合征的系统评价

A systematic review of medial epicondylectomy as a surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome.

作者信息

O'Grady Eva E, Vanat Qureish, Power Dominic M, Tan Simon

机构信息

Hand and Peripheral Nerve Surgery Service, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Nov;42(9):941-945. doi: 10.1177/1753193417724351. Epub 2017 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1177/1753193417724351
PMID:28856934
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The aim of this study was to review the literature of decompression of the cubital tunnel with medial epicondylectomy and to assess outcomes and complications. Twenty-one case series reported on 886 medial epicondylectomies. The mean percentage of patients obtaining improvement of one or more McGowan grade was 79%. The mean percentage obtaining a good/excellent Wilson Krout grade of outcome was 83%. Of six comparative studies, two showed no significant differences in outcomes between medial epicondylectomy and transposition procedures, and three reported better outcomes with medial epicondylectomy. One reported similar outcomes with medial epicondylectomy and simple decompression. The existing literature on medial epicondylectomy is of limited methodological quality and does not allow for firm conclusions to be drawn regarding its efficacy compared with other surgical techniques. Further studies should aim for high methodological quality, randomized comparison with simple decompression or anterior transposition and should utilize standardized outcome measures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

未标注

本研究的目的是回顾关于内侧上髁切除术治疗肘管减压的文献,并评估其疗效和并发症。21个病例系列报道了886例内侧上髁切除术。获得一个或多个McGowan分级改善的患者平均百分比为79%。获得良好/优秀Wilson Krout结局分级的平均百分比为83%。在六项比较研究中,两项显示内侧上髁切除术与转位手术在疗效上无显著差异,三项报道内侧上髁切除术疗效更佳。一项报道内侧上髁切除术与单纯减压疗效相似。现有的关于内侧上髁切除术的文献方法学质量有限,与其他手术技术相比,无法就其疗效得出确凿结论。进一步的研究应旨在提高方法学质量,与单纯减压或前转位进行随机比较,并应采用标准化的结局指标。

证据级别

II级。

相似文献

1
A systematic review of medial epicondylectomy as a surgical treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome.内侧上髁切除术治疗肘管综合征的系统评价
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2017 Nov;42(9):941-945. doi: 10.1177/1753193417724351. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
2
Safety and Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques for Cubital Tunnel Decompression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.不同肘管减压手术技术的安全性和结局:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024352. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24352.
3
Outcomes measures used to assess results after surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome: a systematic review of the literature.用于评估肘管综合征手术后结果的疗效指标:文献系统综述
J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Oct;34(8):1482-1491.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.05.010.
4
Outcome of partial medial epicondylectomy for cubital tunnel syndrome.肘管综合征行部分内侧上髁切除术的疗效
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Mar;444:134-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000201153.36948.29.
5
Comparison between partial and minimal medial epicondylectomy combined with decompression for the treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome.部分和微创内上髁切除术联合减压治疗肘管综合征的比较
J Hand Surg Am. 2000 Nov;25(6):1043-50. doi: 10.1053/jhsu.2000.17864.
6
Endoscopic versus Open In Situ Cubital Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis of 655 Patients.内镜下与开放式肘管原位松解术:文献系统评价和 655 例患者的荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Mar;141(3):679-684. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004112.
7
Open Versus Endoscopic Cubital Tunnel In Situ Decompression: A Systematic Review of Outcomes and Complications.开放性与内镜下原位尺神经沟减压术:疗效与并发症的系统评价
Hand (N Y). 2017 May;12(3):229-235. doi: 10.1177/1558944716662018. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
8
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.腕管减压术后皮肤缝合用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD011757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011757.pub2.
9
Minimal medial epicondylectomy and decompression for cubital tunnel syndrome.微创内侧上髁切除术及尺神经沟减压术治疗肘管综合征
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Dec(393):228-36. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200112000-00025.
10
Is simple decompression enough for the treatment of idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome: A prospective comparative study analyzing the outcomes of simple decompression versus partial medial epicondylectomy.单纯减压术治疗特发性肘管综合征是否足够:一项前瞻性对比研究,分析单纯减压术与部分内侧髁切除术的疗效。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(3):523-531. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.74400.

引用本文的文献

1
The Unpredictable Ulnar Nerve-Ulnar Nerve Entrapment from Anatomical, Pathophysiological, and Biopsychosocial Aspects.难以预测的尺神经——从解剖学、病理生理学和生物心理社会学角度看尺神经卡压
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 24;14(5):489. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14050489.
2
Management of Failed Carpal and Cubital Tunnel Release: An Evidence-Based Guide to Success.腕管和肘管松解术失败的处理:成功的循证指南
J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2023 Jun 9;5(4):510-518. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2023.05.008. eCollection 2023 Jul.
3
Feasibility of a fascial flap to avoid anterior transposition of unstable Ulnar nerve: A cadaver study.
使用筋膜瓣避免不稳定尺神经前移的可行性:一项尸体研究。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023 Jun 24;42:102202. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102202. eCollection 2023 Jul.
4
Cubital tunnel syndrome.肘管综合征
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Sep 14;6(9):743-750. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200129. eCollection 2021 Sep.
5
The management of failed cubital tunnel decompression.尺神经沟减压术失败后的处理
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Sep 14;6(9):735-742. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200135. eCollection 2021 Sep.
6
Ultrasound-Assisted Precise In Situ Decompression for Cubital Tunnel Syndrome.超声辅助精准肘管综合征原位减压术。
Orthop Surg. 2021 May;13(3):840-846. doi: 10.1111/os.12922. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
7
Safety and Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques for Cubital Tunnel Decompression: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.不同肘管减压手术技术的安全性和结局:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2024352. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24352.
8
Is simple decompression enough for the treatment of idiopathic cubital tunnel syndrome: A prospective comparative study analyzing the outcomes of simple decompression versus partial medial epicondylectomy.单纯减压术治疗特发性肘管综合征是否足够:一项前瞻性对比研究,分析单纯减压术与部分内侧髁切除术的疗效。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2020;31(3):523-531. doi: 10.5606/ehc.2020.74400.
9
Cubital Tunnel Syndrome: Current Concepts.肘管综合征:当前概念
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Aug;13(4):520-524. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09650-y.
10
Anterior Subcutaneous Transposition of the Ulnar Nerve Affects Elbow Range of Motion: A Mean 13.5 Years of Follow-up.尺神经皮下前置术对肘部活动范围的影响:平均随访 13.5 年。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2018 Feb 5;131(3):282-288. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.223851.