Nakashian Michael N, Ireland Danielle, Kane Patrick M
The Rothman Institute, 457 Jack Martin Blvd, Brick, NJ, 08724, USA.
Philadelphia Hand to Shoulder Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2020 Aug;13(4):520-524. doi: 10.1007/s12178-020-09650-y.
Compressive neuropathy of the ulnar nerve across the elbow is a common diagnosis encountered frequently within a hand and upper extremity clinical practice. Appropriate and timely evaluation, diagnosis, objective testing, and evidence-based decisions regarding treatment options are paramount in the optimal care of the patient with this pathology. An understanding of current literature is critical in determining and understanding best practices.
A thorough review of the recent literature regarding physical examination, diagnostic testing, and nonoperative versus operative results was performed. Regarding physical examination, the glenohumeral internal rotation test and scratch collapse test are more effective and sensitive than traditional maneuvers such as Tinel's testing and the elbow flexion test. Electrodiagnostic testing, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound evaluation have all been shown to be effective in diagnosing cubital tunnel syndrome. However, no single test has proven itself to be superior. Nonoperative treatment can be successful for mild cases of cubital tunnel syndrome. Surgical release techniques comparing open with endoscopic release are equivocal, and in situ release versus transposition techniques show that transposition should not be performed routinely. The diagnosis and treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome do not have a well-defined algorithm based on current literature. The treating physician must therefore utilize the available information to determine a diagnostic and treatment plan individualized to the patient. More rigorous scientific studies are needed to determine the most effective surgical approaches for cubital tunnel syndrome.
尺神经在肘部的卡压性神经病变是手部和上肢临床实践中常见的诊断。对于患有这种病症的患者,进行适当且及时的评估、诊断、客观测试以及基于证据的治疗方案决策对于提供最佳护理至关重要。了解当前文献对于确定和理解最佳实践至关重要。
对近期有关体格检查、诊断测试以及非手术与手术结果的文献进行了全面回顾。关于体格检查,肩肱关节内旋试验和抓痕塌陷试验比传统手法(如Tinel试验和肘部屈曲试验)更有效且更敏感。电诊断测试、磁共振成像和超声评估均已被证明在诊断肘管综合征方面有效。然而,没有单一测试被证明是更优越的。对于轻度肘管综合征病例,非手术治疗可能成功。比较开放手术与内镜下松解术的手术松解技术尚无定论,原位松解术与转位技术的比较表明不应常规进行转位手术。基于当前文献,肘管综合征的诊断和治疗尚无明确的算法。因此,治疗医生必须利用现有信息来确定针对患者的个性化诊断和治疗方案。需要更严格的科学研究来确定肘管综合征最有效的手术方法。