• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊医学教育研究的批判性评价:2015年最佳出版物

Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2015.

作者信息

Heitz Corey R, Coates Wendy, Farrell Susan E, Fisher Jonathan, Juve Amy Miller, Yarris Lalena M

机构信息

Carilion Clinic/Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA.

Harbor/University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;24(10):1212-1225. doi: 10.1111/acem.13305.

DOI:10.1111/acem.13305
PMID:28857348
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objectives were to critically appraise the medical education research literature of 2015 and review the highest-quality quantitative and qualitative examples.

METHODS

A total of 434 emergency medicine (EM)-related articles were discovered upon a search of ERIC, PsychINFO, PubMED, and SCOPUS. These were both quantitative and qualitative in nature. All were screened by two of the authors using previously published exclusion criteria, and the remaining were appraised by all authors using a previously published scoring system. The highest scoring articles were then reviewed.

RESULTS

Sixty-one manuscripts were scored, and 10 quantitative and two qualitative papers were the highest scoring and are reviewed and summarized in this article.

CONCLUSIONS

This installment in this critical appraisal series reviews 12 of the highest-quality EM-related medical education research manuscripts published in 2015.

摘要

目的

对2015年医学教育研究文献进行批判性评价,并回顾最高质量的定量和定性实例。

方法

通过检索教育资源信息中心(ERIC)、心理学文摘数据库(PsychINFO)、医学期刊数据库(PubMed)和Scopus数据库,共发现434篇与急诊医学(EM)相关的文章。这些文章既有定量研究也有定性研究。所有文章均由两位作者根据先前发表的排除标准进行筛选,其余文章则由所有作者使用先前发表的评分系统进行评价。然后对得分最高的文章进行回顾。

结果

对61篇手稿进行了评分,10篇定量研究论文和2篇定性研究论文得分最高,本文对其进行了回顾和总结。

结论

本批判性评价系列的这一期回顾了2015年发表的12篇最高质量的与急诊医学相关的医学教育研究手稿。

相似文献

1
Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2015.急诊医学教育研究的批判性评价:2015年最佳出版物
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 Oct;24(10):1212-1225. doi: 10.1111/acem.13305.
2
Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Education Research: The Best Publications of 2014.急诊医学教育研究的批判性评估:2014年最佳出版物
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Nov;22(11):1327-36. doi: 10.1111/acem.12801. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
3
Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2015.急诊医学教育研究的批判性评价:2015年最佳出版物
AEM Educ Train. 2017 Oct 17;1(4):255-268. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10063. eCollection 2017 Oct.
4
Critical appraisal of emergency medicine education research: the best publications of 2012.急危重症医学教育研究的批判性评价:2012 年最佳出版物。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Mar;21(3):322-33. doi: 10.1111/acem.12336.
5
Critical appraisal of emergency medicine education research: the best publications of 2013.急诊医学教育研究的批判性评价:2013年最佳出版物
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;21(11):1274-83. doi: 10.1111/acem.12507.
6
Critical appraisal of emergency medicine educational research: the best publications of 2010.急危重症医学教育研究的批判性评价:2010 年最佳出版物。
Acad Emerg Med. 2011 Oct;18(10):1081-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01191.x.
7
The Flipped Classroom: A Critical Appraisal.翻转课堂:批判性评价。
West J Emerg Med. 2019 May;20(3):527-536. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.2.40979. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
8
Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2016.急诊医学教育研究的批判性评价:2016年最佳出版物
AEM Educ Train. 2018 Dec 14;3(1):58-73. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10203. eCollection 2019 Jan.
9
Critical appraisal of emergency medicine educational research: the best publications of 2011.急诊医学教育研究的批判性评价:2011 年最佳出版物。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;20(2):200-8. doi: 10.1111/acem.12070.
10
An Analysis of the Top-cited Articles in Emergency Medicine Education Literature.急诊医学教育文献中被引频次最高文章的分析。
West J Emerg Med. 2017 Jan;18(1):60-68. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.10.31492. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

引用本文的文献

1
A Literature Study of Medical Simulations for Non-Technical Skills Training in Emergency Medicine: Twenty Years of Progress, an Integrated Research Framework, and Future Research Avenues.医学模拟在急诊非技术技能培训中的文献研究:二十年的进展、综合研究框架和未来研究方向。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 2;20(5):4487. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054487.
2
Critical Appraisal of Anesthesiology Educational Research for 2018.2018年麻醉学教育研究的批判性评估
J Educ Perioper Med. 2020 Jan 1;22(1):E637. eCollection 2020 Jan-Mar.
3
Emergency Medicine Education Research Since the 2012 Consensus Conference: How Far Have We Come and What's Next?
自2012年共识会议以来的急诊医学教育研究:我们取得了哪些进展,下一步是什么?
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Nov 22;4(Suppl 1):S57-S66. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10404. eCollection 2020 Feb.
4
Critical Appraisal of Emergency Medicine Educational Research: The Best Publications of 2016.急诊医学教育研究的批判性评价:2016年最佳出版物
AEM Educ Train. 2018 Dec 14;3(1):58-73. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10203. eCollection 2019 Jan.