Suppr超能文献

急性冠状动脉综合征的当代抗血小板治疗:氯吡格雷和替格瑞洛在疗效及停药方面存在差异吗?

Contemporary antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndromes: are there differences in outcomes and discontinuation between clopidogrel and ticagrelor?

作者信息

Harding Scott A, Holley Ana, Wilkins Ben, Fairley Sarah, Simmonds Mark, Larsen Peter D

机构信息

Wellington Cardiovascular Research Group, Wellington, New Zealand.

Department of Cardiology, Wellington Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand.

出版信息

Intern Med J. 2017 Nov;47(11):1298-1305. doi: 10.1111/imj.13595.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: We studied clinical outcomes and discontinuation rates in a 'real-world' population presenting with myocardial infarction treated with ticagrelor or clopidogrel.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and May 2015, 992 patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing invasive management and adequately pre-treated with dual antiplatelet therapy were prospectively enrolled. Platelet aggregation was measured using the Multiplate analyser. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes and 1-year outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Patients treated with ticagrelor were younger and less likely to be diabetic, have a previous myocardial infarction or present with a ST-elevation myocardial infarction (all P < 0.05). Those treated with ticagrelor also had lower CRUSADE (Can Rapid risk stratification of Unstable angina patients Suppress ADverse outcomes with Early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines; 20 ± 9.4 vs 23 ± 10.1, P < 0.0001) and GRACE (119 ± 28 vs 126 ± 32, P = 0.002) scores. High platelet reactivity was greatly reduced with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel (16.1% vs 37.0%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Non-coronary artery bypass grafting-related thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major and minor bleeding occurred at similar rates in those treated with ticagrelor and clopidogrel. Rates of drug discontinuation in those treated with ticagrelor and clopidogrel were similar in hospital (20.2% vs 16.2%, P = 0.18) and between discharge and 1 year (29.9% vs 27.9%, P = 0.63). However, discontinuation due to dyspnoea, (3.3% vs 0%, P < 0.0001) and discontinuation due to any possible drug-related adverse event (9.3% vs 2.2%, P = 0.0001) was more common in those treated with ticagrelor compared to clopidogrel CONCLUSION: Ticagrelor is paradoxically being used in lower-risk patients rather than those most likely to benefit. Ticagrelor was associated with similar rates of bleeding but higher discontinuation rates due to adverse effects compared to clopidogrel.

摘要

背景/目的:我们研究了在接受替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷治疗的心肌梗死“真实世界”人群中的临床结局和停药率。

方法

在2012年1月至2015年5月期间,前瞻性纳入了992例接受侵入性治疗并接受充分双联抗血小板治疗预处理的急性心肌梗死患者。使用多电极血小板聚集分析仪测量血小板聚集。收集基线特征、住院结局和1年结局。

结果

接受替格瑞洛治疗的患者更年轻,患糖尿病、既往有心肌梗死或表现为ST段抬高型心肌梗死的可能性更小(所有P<0.05)。接受替格瑞洛治疗的患者CRUSADE(不稳定型心绞痛患者快速风险分层以通过早期实施ACC/AHA指南抑制不良结局;20±9.4 vs 23±10.1,P<0.0001)和GRACE(119±28 vs 126±32,P=0.002)评分也更低。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛可大大降低高血小板反应性(分别为16.1% vs 37.0%;P<0.0001)。接受替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷治疗的患者发生非冠状动脉旁路移植术相关心肌梗死的主要和次要出血率相似。接受替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷治疗的患者在住院期间的停药率相似(20.2% vs 16.2%,P=0.18),出院至1年期间的停药率也相似(29.9% vs 27.9%,P=0.63)。然而,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛治疗的患者因呼吸困难停药(3.3% vs 0%,P<0.0001)以及因任何可能的药物相关不良事件停药(9.3% vs 2.2%,P=0.0001)更为常见。

结论

矛盾的是,替格瑞洛更多用于低风险患者,而非最可能获益的患者。与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛的出血率相似,但因不良反应导致的停药率更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验