Hee Leia, Gibbs Oliver J, Assad Joseph G, Sharma Lokesh D, Hopkins Andrew, Juergens Craig P, Lo Sidney, Mussap Christian J
Department of Cardiology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2019 Oct;31(4):151-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2019.05.005. Epub 2019 May 31.
The primary aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) using ticagrelor (T-DAPT) versus clopidogrel (C-DAPT) in a real-world ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) population.
We retrospectively analyzed 655 consecutive patients having primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for STEMI at Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia (from January 2013 to April 2016). Medical and procedural therapies were at clinician discretion. Patient data were retrieved from hospital records and primary clinicians.
T-DAPT (65%) was used more frequently, and in patients with lower mean CRUSADE (Can Rapid Risk Stratification of Unstable Angina Patients Suppress Adverse Outcomes with Early Implementation of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Guidelines) score, than C-DAPT (24.6 vs. 32.2; < 0.0001, respectively). All-cause mortality was 9.0% at 2.7 years follow-up, with fewer deaths for T-DAPT (4.5% vs. 17.2%; < 0.0001). T-DAPT incurred less BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) 3-5 major bleeding (5.0% vs. 12.4%; < 0.0001). Multivariate regression showed that C-DAPT, GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Cardiac Events) score, and renal insufficiency were independently associated with mortality. Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) and GRACE score independently predicted BARC 3-5 bleeding. Early DAPT discontinuation (1.7%) and ticagrelor intolerance (7.6%) was rare. Switching DAPT regimen was infrequent (21.7%) and mostly attributed to clinician preference (73.2%). Independent determinants of C-DAPT selection were older age, diabetes, prior PCI, IABP, and higher CRUSADE score.
Ticagrelor was preferred in low bleeding risk patients, which may have contributed to less BARC 3-5 bleeding and lower mortality for T-DAPT. Thus, bleeding mitigation is a clinical priority when selecting DAPT for PCI-treated STEMI patients. Continuation of initial DAPT regimen was typical, but early switching from clopidogrel to ticagrelor shows willingness to optimize DAPT. Patients with very low CRUSADE scores (<21.5) may be appropriate for switching to a potent P2Y12 inhibitor.
主要目的是在真实世界的ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者群体中,研究使用替格瑞洛的双联抗血小板治疗(T-DAPT)与使用氯吡格雷的双联抗血小板治疗(C-DAPT)的疗效和安全性。
我们回顾性分析了澳大利亚悉尼利物浦医院(2013年1月至2016年4月)连续655例因STEMI接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者。药物和手术治疗由临床医生决定。患者数据从医院记录和初级临床医生处获取。
T-DAPT(65%)的使用频率高于C-DAPT(24.6%对32.2%;P均<0.0001),且T-DAPT用于平均CRUSADE(不稳定型心绞痛患者快速风险分层能否通过早期实施美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南抑制不良结局)评分较低的患者。在2.7年的随访中,全因死亡率为9.0%,T-DAPT组的死亡人数较少(4.5%对17.2%;P<0.0001)。T-DAPT组发生BARC(出血学术研究联盟)3-5级严重出血的情况较少(5.0%对12.4%;P<0.0001)。多变量回归显示,C-DAPT、GRACE(急性心脏事件全球注册)评分和肾功能不全与死亡率独立相关。主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)和GRACE评分独立预测BARC 3-5级出血。早期停用DAPT(1.7%)和替格瑞洛不耐受(7.6%)的情况很少见。更换DAPT方案的情况不常见(21.7%),且大多归因于临床医生的偏好(73.2%)。选择C-DAPT的独立决定因素包括年龄较大、糖尿病、既往PCI、IABP和较高的CRUSADE评分。
替格瑞洛在出血风险较低的患者中更受青睐,这可能是T-DAPT组BARC 3-5级出血较少和死亡率较低的原因。因此,在为接受PCI治疗的STEMI患者选择DAPT时,减轻出血是临床优先考虑的事项。继续初始DAPT方案是常见的,但从氯吡格雷早期转换为替格瑞洛表明有优化DAPT的意愿。CRUSADE评分极低(<21.5)的患者可能适合转换为强效P2Y12抑制剂。