Suppr超能文献

左旋布比卡因与利多卡因联合用于乳腺癌象限切除术患者的椎旁阻滞时,比单独使用左旋布比卡因会引起更大的血流动力学波动。

A combination of levobupivacaine and lidocaine for paravertebral block in breast cancer patients undergoing quadrantectomy causes greater hemodynamic oscillations than levobupivacaine alone.

作者信息

Župčić Miroslav, Graf Župčić Sandra, Duzel Viktor, Šimurina Tatjana, Šakić Livija, Fudurić Jurica, Peršec Jasminka, Milošević Milan, Stanec Zdenko, Korušić Anđelko, Barišin Stjepan

机构信息

Miroslav Župčić, Anesthesiology, Reanimatology and Intensive Care Medicine, Clinical Hospital Dubrava, Av. G. Šuška 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia,

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2017 Aug 31;58(4):270-280. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2017.58.270.

Abstract

AIM

To test for differences in hemodynamic and analgesic properties in patients with breast cancer undergoing quadrantectomy with paravertebral block (PVB) induced with a solution of either one or two local anesthetics.

METHOD

A prospective, single-center, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial was conducted from June 2014 until September 2015. A total of 85 women with breast cancer were assigned to receive PVB with either 0.5% levobupivacaine (n=42) or 0.5% levobupivacaine with 2% lidocaine (n=43). Hemodynamic variables of interest included intraoperative stroke volume variation (SVV), mean arterial pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, episodes of hypotension, use of crystalloids, and use of inotropes. Analgesic variables of interest were time to block onset, duration of analgesia, and postoperative serial pain assessment using a visual analogue scale.

RESULTS

Although the use of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 2% lidocaine solution for PVB decreased the mean time-to-block onset (14 minutes; P<0.001), it also caused significantly higher SVV values over the 60 minutes of monitoring (mean difference: 4.33; P<0.001). Furthermore, the patients who received 0.5% levobupivacaine with 2% lidocaine experienced shorter mean duration of analgesia (105 minutes; P=0.006) and more episodes of hypotension (17.5%; P=0.048) and received more intraoperative crystalloids (mean volume: 550 mL; P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The use of 0.5% levobupivacaine in comparison with 0.5% levobupivacaine with 2% lidocaine solution for PVB had a longer time-to-block onset, but it also reduced hemodynamic disturbances and prolonged the analgesic effect.

摘要

目的

检测接受象限切除术的乳腺癌患者在使用一种或两种局部麻醉药溶液诱导椎旁阻滞(PVB)时血流动力学和镇痛特性的差异。

方法

2014年6月至2015年9月进行了一项前瞻性、单中心、随机、双盲、对照试验。总共85例乳腺癌女性被分配接受0.5%左旋布比卡因(n = 42)或0.5%左旋布比卡因加2%利多卡因(n = 43)的PVB。感兴趣的血流动力学变量包括术中每搏量变异(SVV)、平均动脉压、心率、心输出量、低血压发作次数、晶体液使用情况和血管活性药物使用情况。感兴趣的镇痛变量为阻滞起效时间、镇痛持续时间以及使用视觉模拟量表进行的术后连续疼痛评估。

结果

虽然使用0.5%左旋布比卡因加2%利多卡因溶液进行PVB可缩短平均阻滞起效时间(14分钟;P < 0.001),但在60分钟的监测期间其也导致显著更高的SVV值(平均差值:4.33;P < 0.001)。此外,接受0.5%左旋布比卡因加2%利多卡因的患者平均镇痛持续时间较短(105分钟;P = 0.006),低血压发作次数更多(17.5%;P = 0.048),术中接受的晶体液更多(平均量:550 mL;P < 0.001)。

结论

与0.5%左旋布比卡因加2%利多卡因溶液相比使用0.5%左旋布比卡因进行PVB的阻滞起效时间更长,但也减少了血流动力学干扰并延长了镇痛效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验