Graf Zupcic Sandra, Zupcic Miroslav, Duzel Viktor, Šimurina Tatjana, Milošević Milan, Basic Silvio, Vuletic Vladimira, Kapural Leonardo
Clinic of Neurology, Clinical Hospital Centre Rijeka, Rijeka 51000, Croatia.
Faculty of Medicine, J. J. Strossmayer University, Osijek 31000, Croatia.
World J Clin Cases. 2018 Dec 26;6(16):1136-1145. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v6.i16.1136.
To investigate the effect of clonidine on the cutaneous silent period (CSP) during spinal anesthesia.
A total of 67 adult patients were included in this randomized, prospective, single-center, double-blind trial. They did not have neurological disorders and were scheduled for inguinal hernia repair surgery. This trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NTC03121261). The patients were randomized into two groups with regards to the intrathecally administered solution: (1) 15 mg of 0.5% levobupivacaine with 50 µg of 0.015% clonidine, or (2) 15 mg of 0.5% levobupivacaine alone. There were 34 patients in the levobupivacaine-clonidine (LC) group and 33 patients in the levobupivacaine (L) group. CSP and its latency were measured four times: prior to the subarachnoid block (SAB), after motor block regression to the 0 level of the Bromage scale, with ongoing sensory blockade, and both 6 and 24 h after SAB.
Only data from 30 patients in each group were analyzed. There were no significant differences between the groups investigated preoperatively and after 24 h. The CSP of the L group at the time point when the Bromage scale was 0 was 44.8 ± 8.1 ms, while in the LC group it measured 40.2 ± 3.8 ms ( = 0.007). The latency in the L group at the time point when the Bromage scale was 0 was 130.3 ± 10.2 ms, and in the LC group it was 144.7 ± 8.3 ms ( < 0.001). The CSP of the L group after 6 h was 59.6 ± 9.8 ms, while in the LC group it was 44.5 ± 5.0 ms ( < 0.001). The latency in the L group after 6 h was 110.4 ± 10.6 ms, while in LC group it was 132.3 ± 9.7 ms ( < 0.001).
Intrathecal addition of clonidine to levobupivacaine for SAB in comparison with levobupivacaine alone results in a diminished inhibitory tonus and shortened CSP.
研究可乐定对脊髓麻醉期间皮肤静息期(CSP)的影响。
本随机、前瞻性、单中心、双盲试验共纳入67例成年患者。他们没有神经系统疾病,计划进行腹股沟疝修补手术。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov(NTC03121261)上注册。根据鞘内注射溶液将患者随机分为两组:(1)15mg 0.5%左旋布比卡因加50μg 0.015%可乐定,或(2)仅15mg 0.5%左旋布比卡因。左旋布比卡因-可乐定(LC)组有34例患者,左旋布比卡因(L)组有33例患者。在蛛网膜下腔阻滞(SAB)前、运动阻滞恢复到 Bromage 量表0级后、感觉阻滞持续存在时以及SAB后6小时和24小时这四个时间点测量CSP及其潜伏期。
每组仅分析了30例患者的数据。术前和24小时后所研究的组之间无显著差异。Bromage量表为0时,L组的CSP为44.8±8.1毫秒,而LC组为40.2±3.8毫秒(P = 0.007)。Bromage量表为0时,L组的潜伏期为130.3±10.2毫秒,LC组为144.7±8.3毫秒(P < 0.001)。6小时后,L组的CSP为59.6±9.8毫秒,LC组为44.5±5.0毫秒(P < 0.001)。6小时后,L组的潜伏期为110.4±10.6毫秒,LC组为132.3±9.7毫秒(P < 0.001)。
与单独使用左旋布比卡因进行蛛网膜下腔阻滞相比,鞘内加入可乐定可使抑制张力降低,CSP缩短。