Oper Dent. 2017 Nov/Dec;42(6):626-635. doi: 10.2341/16-375-L. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
In this laboratory study, the microtensile bond strengths (μTBS) of resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RM-GIC) to sound and artificial caries-affected bovine root dentin (ACAD) using three different conditioning agents were evaluated after 24 hours and three months. The fractured interface was examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Specimens were created on bovine root dentin that was embedded in epoxy resin. For the ACAD specimens, artificial carious lesions were created. The RM-GIC (Fuji II LC) was applied either directly (no treatment), after application of self conditioner, cavity conditioner, or 17% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) applied for 60 seconds, on sound dentin and ACAD, then light cured. They were stored in artificial saliva for 24 hours or three months. Following this, the specimens were cut into sticks for the μTBS test, and the failure mode of the debonded specimens was examined by using SEM. Pretest failures were excluded from the statistical analysis of the μTBS values because of their high incidence in some groups. Results showed that the μTBS values were significantly affected by the dentin substrate as well as the conditioning agent. Self conditioner provided the highest and most stable μTBS values, while cavity conditioner showed stable μTBS values on sound dentin. Both self conditioner and cavity conditioner had significantly higher μTBS values than the no treatment groups. EDTA conditioning reduced the μTBS after three months to sound dentin, while it showed 100% pretest failure with ACAD for both storage periods.
在这项实验室研究中,评估了三种不同处理剂对健康和人工龋损牛根牙本质(ACAD)的树脂改良玻璃离子水门汀(RM-GIC)的微拉伸粘结强度(μTBS),在 24 小时和三个月后进行测量。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)检查断裂界面。标本是在嵌入环氧树脂的牛根牙本质上制备的。对于 ACAD 标本,人工龋损是制造的。RM-GIC(Fuji II LC)直接应用(无处理),或在应用自处理剂、窝洞处理剂或 17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)处理 60 秒后,应用于健康牙本质和 ACAD 上,然后光固化。将它们储存在人工唾液中 24 小时或三个月。之后,将标本切割成棒状进行 μTBS 测试,并使用 SEM 检查脱粘标本的失效模式。由于某些组的预测试失败率较高,因此在统计分析 μTBS 值时排除了预测试失败。结果表明,μTBS 值受牙本质基底和处理剂的显著影响。自处理剂提供了最高和最稳定的 μTBS 值,而窝洞处理剂在健康牙本质上显示出稳定的 μTBS 值。自处理剂和窝洞处理剂的 μTBS 值均明显高于无处理组。EDTA 处理在三个月后降低了健康牙本质的 μTBS 值,而在两个储存期内,ACAD 均出现 100%的预测试失败。