1 Formerly of Shire, Lexington, USA.
2 Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA.
J Psychopharmacol. 2017 Sep;31(9):1190-1203. doi: 10.1177/0269881117722998. Epub 2017 Aug 31.
This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluated dose-response relationships of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate when used as augmentation for major depressive disorder in individuals exhibiting inadequate responses to antidepressant monotherapy.
Eligible adults (18-65 years) were assigned to antidepressant monotherapy (escitalopram or venlafaxine extended-release) plus lisdexamfetamine dimesylate-matching placebo during an eight-week single-blind lead-in phase. Participants meeting randomization criteria were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to eight weeks of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (10, 30, 50, or 70 mg) or placebo while maintaining antidepressant therapy. Dose-responses for changes from augmentation baseline to week 16/early termination for Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score (primary efficacy endpoint) and vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse) were assessed using multiple comparisons procedures with modeling.
For Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score change, no significant dose-responses were observed for any candidate dose-response curve (all p>0.10). In the dose-response evaluable population, least squares mean (90% confidence interval) treatment differences versus placebo for Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score change at week 16 were -1.4 (-3.9, 1.2), 0.1 (-2.5, 2.7), -0.7 (-3.4, 2.0), and -0.9 (-3.5, 1.6) with 10, 30, 50, and 70 mg lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, respectively. For all vital sign parameters, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate exhibited significant dose-responses for all candidate dose-response curves (all p<0.10), with increases observed as lisdexamfetamine dimesylate dose increased; a linear relationship provided the best fit. Mean±standard deviation changes from augmentation baseline for systolic and diastolic blood pressure and pulse at week 16/early termination were -0.7±9.90 and -0.3±7.24 mm Hg and 0.2±10.57 bpm with placebo and were 1.9±9.47 and 0.8±7.40 mm Hg and 3.6±9.74 bpm with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (all doses combined). The safety and tolerability profile of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate was consistent with previous studies.
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate augmentation did not provide benefit over placebo in adults with inadequate responses to antidepressant monotherapy based on the assessed efficacy measures.
这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的研究评估了琥珀酸利右苯丙胺在抗抑郁药单药治疗反应不足的个体中作为增效治疗时的剂量反应关系,用于治疗重度抑郁症。
符合条件的成年人(18-65 岁)在为期八周的单盲导入期被分配接受抗抑郁药单药治疗(依他普仑或文拉法辛缓释剂)加琥珀酸利右苯丙胺匹配安慰剂。在符合随机分组标准的参与者中,他们被随机(1:1:1:1:1)分配接受八周的琥珀酸利右苯丙胺(10、30、50 或 70mg)或安慰剂治疗,同时维持抗抑郁治疗。使用建模的多重比较程序评估从增效治疗基线到第 16 周/提前终止的 Montgomery-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表总分(主要疗效终点)和生命体征(收缩压和舒张压以及脉搏)的变化的剂量反应。
对于 Montgomery-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表总分的变化,任何候选剂量反应曲线均未观察到显著的剂量反应(均 p>0.10)。在剂量反应可评估人群中,与安慰剂相比,第 16 周时琥珀酸利右苯丙胺治疗的 Montgomery-Åsberg 抑郁评定量表总分变化的最小二乘均值(90%置信区间)分别为-1.4(-3.9,1.2)、0.1(-2.5,2.7)、-0.7(-3.4,2.0)和-0.9(-3.5,1.6)。对于所有生命体征参数,琥珀酸利右苯丙胺均表现出所有候选剂量反应曲线的显著剂量反应(均 p<0.10),随着琥珀酸利右苯丙胺剂量的增加而观察到增加;线性关系提供了最佳拟合。第 16 周/提前终止时,与安慰剂相比,收缩压和舒张压以及脉搏的平均±标准偏差变化分别为-0.7±9.90 和-0.3±7.24mmHg 和 0.2±10.57bpm,而琥珀酸利右苯丙胺(所有剂量合并)为 1.9±9.47 和 0.8±7.40mmHg 和 3.6±9.74bpm。琥珀酸利右苯丙胺的安全性和耐受性与先前的研究一致。
基于评估的疗效指标,琥珀酸利右苯丙胺增效治疗在抗抑郁药单药治疗反应不足的成年人中并未提供优于安慰剂的疗效。