Suppr超能文献

导管定向溶栓治疗急性下肢深静脉血栓形成的安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wang Li, Zhang Chuanlin, Mu Shaoyu, Yeh Chao Hsing, Chen Liqun, Zhang Zeju, Wang Xueqin

机构信息

School of Nursing, Chongqing Medical University Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, PR China Johns Hopkins School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA School of Nursing, Chongqing Medical and Pharmaceutical College, Chongqing, PR China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(35):e7922. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007922.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite established guidelines, catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for the management of acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) should not be overstated because the risks of CDT are uncertain. We performed a meta-analysis to comprehensively and quantitatively evaluate the safety of CDT for patients with acute lower extremity DVT.

METHODS

Relevant databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus, were searched up to January 2017. The inclusion criteria were applied to select patients with acute lower extremity DVT treated by CDT or compared CDT with anticoagulation. In case series studies, the pooled estimates of safety outcomes for complications, pulmonary embolism (PE), and mortality were calculated across studies. In studies comparing CDT with anticoagulation, summary odds ratios (ORs) were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 1696 citations identified, 24 studies (6 comparing CDT with anticoagulation and 18 case series) including 9157 patients met the eligibility criteria. In the case series studies, the pooled risks of major, minor, and total complications were 0.03 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02-0.04), 0.07 (95% CI: 0.05-0.08), and 0.09 (95% CI: 0.08-0.11), respectively; other pooled risk results were 0.00 for PE (95% CI: 0.00-0.01) and 0.07 for mortality (95% CI: 0.03-0.11). Our meta-analysis of 6 studies comparing the risk of complications and PE related to CDT with those related to anticoagulation showed that CDT was associated with an increased risk of complications (OR = 4.36; 95% CI: 2.94-6.47) and PE (OR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.37-1.79).

CONCLUSION

Acute lower extremity DVT patients receiving CDT are associated with a low risk of complications. However, compared with anticoagulation, CDT is associated with a higher risk of complications and PE. Rare mortality related to thrombolytic therapy was reported. More evidence should be accumulated to prove the safety of CDT.

摘要

背景

尽管已有既定指南,但导管定向溶栓术(CDT)用于治疗急性下肢深静脉血栓形成(DVT)的效果不应被夸大,因为CDT的风险尚不确定。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以全面、定量地评估CDT治疗急性下肢DVT患者的安全性。

方法

检索了截至2017年1月的相关数据库,包括PubMed、Embase、Cochrane、Ovid MEDLINE和Scopus。应用纳入标准选择接受CDT治疗或比较CDT与抗凝治疗的急性下肢DVT患者。在病例系列研究中,计算各项研究中并发症、肺栓塞(PE)和死亡率等安全性结局的合并估计值。在比较CDT与抗凝治疗的研究中,计算汇总比值比(OR)。

结果

在检索到的1696篇文献中,24项研究(6项比较CDT与抗凝治疗,18项病例系列研究)共9157例患者符合纳入标准。在病例系列研究中,严重并发症、轻微并发症和总并发症的合并风险分别为0.03(95%置信区间[CI]:0.02 - 0.04)、0.07(95% CI:0.05 - 0.08)和0.09(95% CI:0.08 - 0.11);其他合并风险结果为PE为0.00(95% CI:0.00 - 0.01),死亡率为0.07(95% CI:0.03 - 0.11)。我们对6项比较CDT与抗凝治疗相关并发症和PE风险的研究进行的荟萃分析表明,CDT与并发症风险增加(OR = 4.36;95% CI:2.94 - 6.47)和PE风险增加(OR = 1.57;95% CI:1.37 - 1.79)相关。

结论

接受CDT治疗的急性下肢DVT患者并发症风险较低。然而,与抗凝治疗相比,CDT与更高的并发症和PE风险相关。有报道称溶栓治疗相关的死亡率罕见。应积累更多证据以证明CDT的安全性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验