Cainelli T, Seidenari S, Valsecchi R, Mosca M
Pharmatherapeutica. 1986;4(10):679-86.
Two new non-sedating antihistamines, astemizole (10 mg per day) and terfenadine (120 mg per day), were compared in a double-blind randomized study in 42 adult patients suffering from chronic urticaria. The trial lasted 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks and kept a daily diary of their symptoms. There was a statistically significant decrease in pruritus, erythema and urticaria papules in both groups throughout the study. Changes in papule size, number and frequency were greater in the astemizole group though not significantly different to the terfenadine group. The effect of astemizole increased with time whereas that of terfenadine decreased after about 3 weeks of treatment. Astemizole was globally considered to be the most effective drug by both investigator and patients, with excellent/good results in 77% of the patients compared with 55% to 60% in the terfenadine group. Both drugs were reported to be more effective and faster acting than other antihistamines taken previously. Side-effects were infrequent and minor in both groups.
在一项针对42名慢性荨麻疹成年患者的双盲随机研究中,对两种新型非镇静性抗组胺药——阿司咪唑(每日10毫克)和特非那定(每日120毫克)进行了比较。试验持续4周。在第2周和第4周对患者进行评估,并让他们每天记录症状。在整个研究过程中,两组患者的瘙痒、红斑和荨麻疹丘疹均有统计学意义的显著减少。阿司咪唑组丘疹大小、数量和出现频率的变化更大,不过与特非那定组无显著差异。阿司咪唑的疗效随时间增加,而特非那定的疗效在治疗约3周后下降。研究者和患者总体上都认为阿司咪唑是最有效的药物,77%的患者取得了优/良效果,而特非那定组为55%至60%。据报道,这两种药物均比之前服用的其他抗组胺药更有效且起效更快。两组的副作用都很少且轻微。