Suppr超能文献

用于慢性自发性荨麻疹的H1抗组胺药。

H1-antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria.

作者信息

Sharma Maulina, Bennett Cathy, Cohen Stuart N, Carter Ben

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Derby Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London Road Community Hospital, London Road, Derby, DE1 2QY, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 14;2014(11):CD006137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006137.pub2.

Abstract

Background Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is characterised by the development of crops of red, itchy, raised weals or hives with no identifiable external cause.Objectives To assess the effects of H1-antihistamines for CSU.Search methods We searched the following databases up to June 2014: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, CENTRAL (2014, Issue 5), MEDLINE(from 1946), EMBASE (from 1974) and PsycINFO (from 1806). We searched five trials registers and checked articles for references to relevant randomised controlled trials.Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials of H1-antihistamines for CSU. Interventions included single therapy or a combination of H1-antihistamines compared with no treatment (placebo) or another active pharmacological compound at any dose.Data collection and analysis We used standard methodological procedures as expected by The Cochrane Collaboration.Our primary outcome measures were proportion of participants with complete suppression of urticaria: 'good or excellent' response,50% or greater improvement in quality of life measures, and adverse events.We present risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals(CIs). Main results We identified 73 studies (9759 participants); 34 studies provided data for 23 comparisons. The duration of the intervention was up to two weeks (short-term) or longer than two weeks and up to three months (intermediate-term).Cetirizine 10mg once daily in the short term and in the intermediate term led to complete suppression of urticaria by more participants than was seen with placebo (RR 2.72, 95% CI 1.51 to 4.91). For this same outcome, comparison of desloratadine versus placebo in the intermediate term (5 mg) (RR 37.00, 95% CI 2.31 to 593.70) and in the short term (20 mg) (RR 15.97, 95% CI 1.04 to 245.04)favoured desloratadine, but no differences were seen between 5 mg and 10 mg for short-term treatment.Levocetirizine 20 mg per day (short-term) was more effective for complete suppression of urticaria compared with placebo (RR 20.87,95% CI 1.37 to 317.60), and at 5 mg was effective in the intermediate term (RR 52.88, 95% CI 3.31 to 843.81) but not in the shortterm, nor was 10 mg effective in the short term.Rupatadine at 10 mg and 20 mg in the intermediate term achieved a 'good or excellent response' compared with placebo (RR 1.35,95% CI 1.03 to 1.77).Loratadine (10 mg) versus placebo (RR 1.86, 95% CI 0.91 to 3.79) and loratadine (10 mg) versus cetirizine (10 mg) (RR 1.05, 95%CI 0.76 to 1.43) over short-term and intermediate-term treatment showed no significant difference for 'good or excellent response' or for complete suppression of urticaria, respectively.Loratadine (10 mg) versus desloratadine (5 mg) (intermediate-term) showed no statistically significant difference for complete suppression of urticaria (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.06) or for 'good or excellent response' (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.71). For loratadine(10 mg) versus mizolastine (10 mg) (intermediate-term), no statistically significant difference was seen for complete suppression of urticaria (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.16) or for 'good or excellent response' (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.42).Loratadine (10mg) versus emedastine (2mg) (intermediate-term) showed no statistically significant difference for complete suppression(RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.39) or for 'good or excellent response' (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.24); the quality of the evidence was moderate for this comparison.No difference in short-term treatment was noted between loratadine (10mg) and hydroxyzine (25mg) in terms of complete suppression(RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.10).When desloratadine (5 to 20 mg) was compared with levocetirizine (5 to 20 mg), levocetirizine appeared to be the more effective (P value < 0.02).In a comparison of fexofenadine versus cetirizine, more participants in the cetirizine group showed complete suppression of urticaria(P value < 0.001).Adverse events leading to withdrawals were not significantly different in the following comparisons: cetirizine versus placebo at 10 mg and 20 mg (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.68 to 13.22); desloratadine 5 mg versus placebo (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.42 to 5.10); loratadine 10 mg versus mizolastine 10 mg (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.04 to 3.60); loratadine 10mg versus emedastine 2mg (RR 1.09, 95%CI 0.07 to 17.14);cetirizine 10 mg versus hydroxyzine 25 mg (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.45); and hydroxyzine 25 mg versus placebo (RR 3.64, 95%CI 0.77 to 17.23), all intermediate term.No difference was seen between loratadine 10 mg versus mizolastine 10 mg in the proportion of participants with at least 50%improvement in quality of life (RR 3.21, 95% CI 0.32 to 32.33).Authors' conclusions Although the results of our review indicate that at standard doses of treatment, several antihistamines are effective when compared with placebo, all results were gathered from a few studies or, in some cases, from single-study estimates. The quality of the evidence was affected by the small number of studies in each comparison and the small sample size for many of the outcomes, prompting us to downgrade the quality of evidence for imprecision (unless stated for each comparison, the quality of the evidence was low).No single H1-antihistamine stands out as most effective. Cetirizine at 10 mg once daily in the short term and in the intermediate term was found to be effective in completely suppressing urticaria. Evidence is limited for desloratadine given at 5 mg once daily in the intermediate term and at 20 mg in the short term. Levocetirizine at 5 mg in the intermediate but not short term was effective for complete suppression. Levocetirizine 20 mg was effective in the short term, but 10 mg was not. No difference in rates of withdrawal due to adverse events was noted between active and placebo groups. Evidence for improvement in quality of life was insufficient.

摘要

背景 慢性自发性荨麻疹(CSU)的特征是出现成片的红色、瘙痒性、隆起的风团或风疹块,且无明确的外部病因。

目的 评估H1抗组胺药治疗CSU的效果。

检索方法 截至2014年6月,我们检索了以下数据库:Cochrane皮肤组专业注册库、CENTRAL(2014年第5期)、MEDLINE(自1946年起)、EMBASE(自1974年起)和PsycINFO(自1806年起)。我们检索了五个试验注册库,并检查文章以查找相关随机对照试验的参考文献。

选择标准 我们纳入了H1抗组胺药治疗CSU的随机对照试验。干预措施包括单一疗法或H1抗组胺药的联合使用,与任何剂量的未治疗(安慰剂)或另一种活性药理化合物进行比较。

数据收集与分析 我们采用了Cochrane协作网预期的标准方法程序。我们的主要结局指标为荨麻疹完全得到控制的参与者比例:“良好或极佳”反应、生活质量指标改善50%或更多,以及不良事件。我们呈现风险比(RR)及95%置信区间(CI)。

主要结果 我们识别出73项研究(9759名参与者);34项研究提供了23项比较的数据。干预持续时间长达两周(短期)或超过两周且长达三个月(中期)。

短期和中期每日一次服用10mg西替利嗪导致荨麻疹完全得到控制的参与者比服用安慰剂的更多(RR 2.72,95%CI 1.51至4.91)。对于同一结局,中期(5mg)地氯雷他定与安慰剂比较(RR 37.00,95%CI 2.31至593.70)以及短期(20mg)比较(RR 15.97,95%CI 1.04至245.04)均有利于地氯雷他定,但短期治疗中5mg与10mg之间未观察到差异。

短期每日服用20mg左西替利嗪在完全控制荨麻疹方面比安慰剂更有效(RR 20.87,95%CI 1.37至317.60),中期5mg有效(RR 52.88,95%CI 3.31至843.81),但短期无效,10mg短期也无效。

中期服用10mg和20mg芦帕他定与安慰剂相比达到了“良好或极佳反应”(RR 1.35,95%CI 1.03至1.77)。

短期和中期治疗中,氯雷他定(10mg)与安慰剂比较(RR 1.86,95%CI 0.91至3.79)以及氯雷他定(10mg)与西替利嗪(10mg)比较(RR 1.05,95%CI 0.76至1.43)在“良好或极佳反应”或荨麻疹完全得到控制方面分别未显示出显著差异。

中期氯雷他定(10mg)与地氯雷他定(5mg)比较在荨麻疹完全得到控制(RR 0.91,95%CI 0.78至1.06)或“良好或极佳反应”(RR 1.04,95%CI 0.64至1.71)方面未显示出统计学显著差异。对于中期氯雷他定(10mg)与咪唑斯汀(10mg)比较,在荨麻疹完全得到控制(RR 0.86,95%CI 0.64至1.16)或“良好或极佳反应”(RR 0.88,95%CI 0.55至1.42)方面未观察到统计学显著差异。

中期氯雷他定(10mg)与依美斯汀(2mg)比较在完全控制方面(RR 1.04,95%CI 0.78至1.39)或“良好或极佳反应”(RR 1.09,95%CI 0.96至1.24)未显示出统计学显著差异;该比较的证据质量为中等。

短期治疗中氯雷他定(10mg)与羟嗪(25mg)在完全控制方面未观察到差异(RR 1.00,95%CI 0.32至3.10)。

当比较地氯雷他定(5至20mg)与左西替利嗪(5至20mg)时,左西替利嗪似乎更有效(P值<0.02)。

在非索非那定与西替利嗪的比较中,西替利嗪组更多参与者的荨麻疹得到完全控制(P值<0.001)。

以下比较中导致退出的不良事件无显著差异

10mg和20mg西替利嗪与安慰剂比较(RR 3.00,95%CI 0.68至13.22);5mg地氯雷他定与安慰剂比较(RR 1.46,95%CI 0.42至5.10);10mg氯雷他定与10mg咪唑斯汀比较(RR 0.38,95%CI 0.04至3.60);10mg氯雷他定与2mg依美斯汀比较(RR 1.09,95%CI 0.07至17.14);10mg西替利嗪与25mg羟嗪比较(RR 0.78,95%CI 0.25至2.45);以及25mg羟嗪与安慰剂比较(RR 3.64,95%CI 0.77至17.23),均为中期。

10mg氯雷他定与10mg咪唑斯汀在生活质量至少改善50%的参与者比例方面未观察到差异(RR 3.21,95%CI 0.32至32.33)。

作者结论 尽管我们的综述结果表明,在标准治疗剂量下,与安慰剂相比,几种抗组胺药是有效的,但所有结果均来自少数研究,或在某些情况下来自单研究估计。每个比较中的研究数量少以及许多结局的样本量小影响了证据质量,促使我们因证据不精确而降低证据质量(除非每个比较另有说明,证据质量为低)。没有一种H1抗组胺药脱颖而出被认为是最有效的。发现短期和中期每日一次服用10mg西替利嗪在完全抑制荨麻疹方面有效。关于中期每日一次服用5mg和短期服用20mg地氯雷他定的证据有限。中期5mg左西替利嗪在完全控制方面有效,但短期无效。20mg左西替利嗪在短期有效,但10mg无效。活性组与安慰剂组在因不良事件导致的退出率方面未观察到差异。生活质量改善的证据不足。

相似文献

1
H1-antihistamines for chronic spontaneous urticaria.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 14;2014(11):CD006137. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006137.pub2.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
4
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
5
Sertindole for schizophrenia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
6
Interventions for infantile haemangiomas of the skin.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD006545. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006545.pub3.
7
Interventions for rosacea.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 28;2015(4):CD003262. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003262.pub5.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Corticosteroids for the treatment of Duchenne muscular dystrophy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 5;2016(5):CD003725. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003725.pub4.
10
Oral budesonide for induction of remission in ulcerative colitis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 26;2015(10):CD007698. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007698.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical and quality of life improvement after bilastine treatment among patients with autoimmune chronic spontaneous urticaria.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 25;20(8):e0326445. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0326445. eCollection 2025.
6
Moxibustion therapy for chronic spontaneous urticaria: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 13;99(46):e23226. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023226.
9
Focus on the cetirizine use in clinical practice: a reappraisal 30 years later.
Multidiscip Respir Med. 2019 Dec 6;14:40. doi: 10.1186/s40248-019-0203-6. eCollection 2019.
10
Management of chronic urticaria in children: a clinical guideline.
Ital J Pediatr. 2019 Aug 15;45(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s13052-019-0695-x.

本文引用的文献

5
Treatment of recalcitrant chronic urticaria with nonsedating antihistamines: is there evidence for updosing?
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2013;23(3):141-4; quiz 2 p preceding 145.
6
Influence of initial treatment modality on long-term control of chronic idiopathic urticaria.
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 23;8(7):e69345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069345. Print 2013.
7
Aspirin-exacerbated cutaneous disease.
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2013 May;33(2):251-62. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Oct 31.
9
Omalizumab for the treatment of chronic idiopathic or spontaneous urticaria.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 7;368(10):924-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215372. Epub 2013 Feb 24.
10
A Summary of the New International EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO Guidelines in Urticaria.
World Allergy Organ J. 2019 Apr 30;5 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-5. doi: 10.1186/1939-4551-5-s1-s1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验