Torp-Pedersen Tobias, Boyd Heather A, Skotte Line, Haargaard Birgitte, Wohlfahrt Jan, Holmes Jonathan M, Melbye Mads
Department of Ophthalmology, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark.
Department of Epidemiology Research, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen S, Denmark.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 1;135(10):1047-1053. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3158.
To our knowledge, there have been few population-based studies of strabismus incidence conducted. Our population-based study provides valuable data for health services planning and identifying research needs.
To determine the incidence and age distribution of strabismus, overall and by subtype, among children 7 years or younger.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This population-based cohort study was conducted with data from 96 842 children enrolled in the Danish National Birth Cohort.
Age-specific incidence and cumulative incidence and median age at the detection of strabismus, overall and by subtype.
The study cohort included 96 842 children born between 1996 and 2008 who are predominantly Caucasian and is composed of approximately 30% of births in Denmark, with a boy-girl ratio of 51:49. Overall, 1309 cases of strabismus were identified in the cohort. We found an overall cumulative strabismus incidence of 2.56% (95% CI, 2.42-2.69) at 7 years. The overall incidence was similar among boys and girls. Two hundred sixteen participants (16.5%) (95% CI, 14.5-18.6) had congenital esotropia, 177 (13.5%) (95% CI, 11.7-15.5) had fully accommodative esotropia, 252 (19.3%) (95% CI, 17.1-21.5) had partially accommodative esotropia, and 181 (13.8%) (95% CI, 12.0-15.8) had exotropia. The esotropia:exotropia ratio was 5.4:1 (95% CI, 3.4:1 to 7.5:1). Age-specific incidence curves for congenital esotropia, fully accommodative esotropia, partially accommodative esotropia, and all exotropia revealed interactions between strabismus subtype and age, suggesting that the different subtypes had different age-specific patterns of incidence (P < .001 for all comparisons between pairs of curves). The median age at detection for the 4 subtypes was 0, 32.0, 26.1, and 16.6 months, respectively.
In a national, population-based cohort study, we found a cumulative incidence of strabismus consistent with those reported in smaller European and American cohorts, but a somewhat higher esotropia:exotropia ratio than those that, to our knowledge, are typically reported by English and American studies. Patterns of incidence by age differed for different strabismus subtypes, indicating differences in age at onset and thereby implying differences in the underlying etiology.
据我们所知,基于人群的斜视发病率研究很少。我们的基于人群的研究为卫生服务规划和确定研究需求提供了有价值的数据。
确定7岁及以下儿童斜视的总体发病率和年龄分布,以及按亚型划分的发病率和年龄分布。
设计、设置和参与者:这项基于人群的队列研究使用了丹麦国家出生队列中96842名儿童的数据。
斜视总体及各亚型的年龄别发病率、累积发病率以及确诊时的中位年龄。
研究队列包括1996年至2008年出生的96842名儿童,主要为白种人,约占丹麦出生人口的30%,男女比例为51:49。总体而言,队列中确诊了1309例斜视病例。我们发现7岁时斜视的总体累积发病率为2.56%(95%CI,2.42 - 2.69)。男孩和女孩的总体发病率相似。216名参与者(16.5%)(95%CI,14.5 - 18.6)患有先天性内斜视,177名(13.5%)(95%CI,11.7 - 宽15.5)患有完全调节性内斜视,252名(19.3%)(95%CI,17.1 - 21.5)患有部分调节性内斜视,181名(13.8%)(95%CI,12.0 - 15.8)患有外斜视。内斜视与外斜视的比例为5.4:1(95%CI,3.4:1至7.5:1)。先天性内斜视、完全调节性内斜视、部分调节性内斜视和所有外斜视的年龄别发病率曲线显示斜视亚型与年龄之间存在相互作用,这表明不同亚型具有不同的年龄别发病模式(所有曲线对之间的比较P <.001)。这4种亚型确诊时的中位年龄分别为0、32.0、26.1和16.6个月。
在一项全国性的基于人群的队列研究中,我们发现斜视的累积发病率与欧美较小队列报道的一致,但内斜视与外斜视的比例略高于据我们所知英美研究通常报道的比例。不同斜视亚型的年龄别发病模式不同,这表明发病年龄存在差异,进而意味着潜在病因存在差异。