Killen Shaun S, Calsbeek Ryan, Williams Tony D
Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Graham Kerr Building, Glasgow, G12?8QQ, UK.
Department of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, USA.
Integr Comp Biol. 2017 Aug 1;57(2):185-194. doi: 10.1093/icb/icx083.
Wild animals often engage in intense physical activity while performing tasks vital for their survival and reproduction associated with foraging, avoiding predators, fighting, providing parental care, and migrating. In this theme issue we consider how viewing these tasks as "exercise"-analogous to that performed by human athletes-may help provide insight into the mechanisms underlying individual variation in these types of behaviors and the importance of physical activity in an ecological context. In this article and throughout this issue, we focus on four key questions relevant to the study of behavioral ecology that may be addressed by studying wild animal behavior from the perspective of exercise physiology: (1) How hard do individual animals work in response to ecological (or evolutionary) demands?; (2) Do lab-based studies of activity provide good models for understanding activity in free-living animals and individual variation in traits?; (3) Can animals work too hard during "routine" activities?; and (4) Can paradigms of "exercise" and "training" be applied to free-living animals? Attempts to address these issues are currently being facilitated by rapid technological developments associated with physiological measurements and the remote tracking of wild animals, to provide mechanistic insights into the behavior of free-ranging animals at spatial and temporal scales that were previously impossible. We further suggest that viewing the behaviors of non-human animals in terms of the physical exercise performed will allow us to fully take advantage of these technological advances, draw from knowledge and conceptual frameworks already in use by human exercise physiologists, and identify key traits that constrain performance and generate variation in performance among individuals. It is our hope that, by highlighting mechanisms of behavior and performance, the articles in this issue will spur on further synergies between physiologists and ecologists, to take advantage of emerging cross-disciplinary perspectives and technologies.
野生动物在执行对其生存和繁殖至关重要的任务时,常常会进行剧烈的体力活动,这些任务包括觅食、躲避捕食者、争斗、提供亲代抚育以及迁徙。在本期专题中,我们思考将这些任务视为“运动”(类似于人类运动员所进行的运动)如何有助于深入了解这些行为类型中个体差异的潜在机制,以及体力活动在生态环境中的重要性。在本文以及整个专题中,我们关注与行为生态学研究相关的四个关键问题,通过从运动生理学的角度研究野生动物行为或许可以解决这些问题:(1)个体动物为响应生态(或进化)需求会付出多大努力?(2)基于实验室的活动研究能否为理解自由生活动物的活动以及性状的个体差异提供良好模型?(3)动物在“日常”活动中会否过度劳累?(4)“运动”和“训练”范式能否应用于自由生活的动物?与生理测量和野生动物远程追踪相关的快速技术发展,目前正在推动人们尝试解决这些问题,从而在以前无法实现的时空尺度上,为自由放养动物的行为提供机制性见解。我们进一步认为,从所进行的体育锻炼角度看待非人类动物的行为,将使我们能够充分利用这些技术进步,借鉴人类运动生理学家已经使用的知识和概念框架,并确定限制表现以及导致个体间表现差异的关键性状。我们希望,通过突出行为和表现的机制,本期专题中的文章将促使生理学家和生态学家之间进一步开展协同合作,以利用新兴的跨学科观点和技术。